Wednesday, March 17, 2021
IDF: Israeli Document Forgers?
Russia and Iran tried to interfere with 2020 election, U.S. intelligence agencies say
But the report said that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized “influence operations aimed at denigrating President Biden’s candidacy and the Democratic Party, supporting former President Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral process, and exacerbating sociopolitical divisions in the US.”
One of Moscow’s key strategies, the report said, was to use Russian intelligence-linked proxies to spread misleading claims and narratives among certain U.S. media outlets and individuals — “including some close to former President Trump and his administration.”
Russia Worked to Boost Trump in 2020—With Help From Giuliani, Fox News, and OANN
Elements in the Russian government, including President Vladimir Putin, oversaw a bid to use outside proxies to feed disinformation to Rudy Giuliani, Fox News, and the right-wing TV network OANN aimed at helping Donald Trump against Joe Biden during the 2020 campaign, a newly declassified US intelligence report reveals.
CNN called out for hyping Russia election interference to hurt Biden, burying Iran's role in damaging Trump
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-russia-iran-election-inteference-trump-biden
A report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) that was made public on Tuesday determined that while there was no evidence of altering ballots or the voting process, it concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin "authorized" influence operations "aimed at denigrating President Biden's presidency" in support of former President Trump's reelection. Similarly, the ODNI concluded that Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei "authorized" to undercut Trump's reelection prospects and to "undermine public confidence in the electoral process and US institutions."
Israel's serious virus caseload drops under 600 for 1st time since December's end
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/SJJ47t07u
According to Health Ministry data, 586 Israelis hospitalized in serious condition with coronavirus and 208 of them were connected to ventilators, 905 new virus cases detected in previous 24 hours
Tel Aviv's Jewish museum reopens after $100 million upgrade
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/SJbKFmLQ00
New US intel report shows Russia, Trump and GOP acolytes have same goals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/17/politics/trump-russia-elections/index.html
A new US intelligence report that finds Russia interfered in the 2020 election to help Donald Trump and hurt Joe Biden also underscores a fundamental truth: The gravest threat to US democracy comes from within.
A Review of International Beit Din Case 105
https://www.torahmusings.com/2015/09/a-review-of-international-beit-din-case-105/
Rav Hershel Schachter published a letter encouraging his students and colleagues to not rely on IBD rulings, to which other dayanim across the country added their agreement. [1] Specifically, Rav Schachter challenged a particular ruling relying on a well-known opinion of the Ritva. This is a reference to the IBD psak (ruling) on Case 105 (from here on: Psak 105), available in both English and Hebrew on the IBD website. [2] The IBD website tells us that “This psak is representative of several decisions handed down by the International Beit Din.” Additionally, Rabbis Simcha Krauss and Yehuda Warburg of the IBD have written with regard to Psak 105 that “This psak din as well as other IBD decisions are available for public scrutiny on our website.” [3] As such, it seems appropriate to subject Psak 105 to the examination which Rabbis Krauss and Warburg have invited. I strongly encourage any reader not to take my word, but to read the English and Hebrew versions of Psak 105 in conjunction with this review. This review will assume that the reader is generally familiar with the contents of Psak 105, including the background and final decision.
Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Important letter from Rav Hershel Schachter, Rav Gedalia Dov Schwartz, Rav Nota Greenblatt, Rav Avrohom Union, and Rav Menachem Mendel Senderovitz regarding the "International Beit Din"
http://www.torahweb.org/torah/docs/ibd-machaa.html
למותר לא דין ולא דיין שטות דבריאלא של לפוסקים עצמם שמינו קלים
בינלאומיים, כבי ד" שבלשכת הגזית, לפגוע בקדושת ישראל שע"י חופה וקידושין
וחבל על בזה ולהאריך הדיו ועל הנייר נטע צבי גרינבלט, מעמפיס, כ"ב תמוז תשע"ה
The “International Beit Din”- A Very Troubling Update
https://yated.com/international-beit-din-troubling-update/
Two years ago, when the activities of IBD became known and were investigated by established poskim, these poskim issued a strong “Letter of Mecho’oh” against IBD. This letter was published by TorahWeb and is available at http://www.torahweb.org/torah/docs/ibd-machaa.html. In their letter, the poskim explain that IBD was using specious heteirim (such as lack of yichud eidim, designation of witnesses, from the Ritva, which is a mere chumra l’halacha and does not invalidate a marriage). The poskim also stated that in previous generations, only gedolei hador, such as Rav Yitzchok Elchonon Spector, Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzensky and Rav Moshe Feinstein, could be mattir agunos, and that the IBD members, who are not anywhere near this stature and are three regular rabbis, were acting way out of their league by issuing such heteirim. The Letter of Mecho’oh referred to the IBD members as acting with “chutzpah gedolah” by doing that which only poskei hador are qualified to do.
Permitting sinning to reduce it?
Igros Moshe (O.C. 4:35) Concerning the issue of mixed dancing of men and women, it is clearly prohibited even if the woman are not Nida and surely is prohibited if they are Nida And they don’t refrain from dancing with married women. It is not relevant to permit mixed dancing with the claim that if you don’t permit it in the social hall they will go to the regular dance halls where they will be dancing with non-Jews.
FBI facing allegation that its 2018 background check of Brett Kavanaugh was ‘fake’
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/16/fbi-brett-kavanaugh-background-check-fake
The supreme court justice was accused of sexual assault by Christine Blasey Ford and faced several other allegations of misconduct following Ford’s harrowing testimony of an alleged assault when she and Kavanaugh were in high school.
Kavanaugh denied the claims.
The FBI was called to investigate the allegations during the Senate confirmation process but was later accused by some Democratic senators of conducting an incomplete background check. For example, two key witnesses – Ford and Kavanaugh – were never interviewed as part of the inquiry.
Among the concerns listed in Whitehouse’s letter to Garland are allegations that some witnesses who wanted to share their accounts with the FBI could not find anyone at the bureau who would accept their testimony and that it had not assigned any individual to accept or gather evidence.
Agunah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agunah
Finding a flaw in the marriage ceremony is considered to be a last resort in releasing an agunah. It is rarely used as it is typically difficult to find actual cause in most marriages sufficient to invalidate them retroactively. In Jewish law, a marriage must be performed in front of two witnesses. In order to release the agunah, efforts are made to identify reasons why one of the witnesses was ineligible. This is typically unachievable as strong efforts are made at the time of marriage to ensure the validity of the witnesses and the marriage ceremony. Another possibility is to prove that the woman did not consent to the marriage clearly and of her own free will, so that the marriage ceremony is declared invalid. This too is not generally accepted amongst the halakhic authorities as there is generally no method to disprove intent. It is felt that the purpose of this endeavor is solely or primarily to retroactively delegitimize a marriage that was performed and accepted often many years previously. Annulling the marriage has no impact on the status of the woman's children. However, since it is not a generally accepted mechanism, it may leave the wife susceptible to a halakhic ruling that she was still married, and any subsequent relations with another man to be adultery. And it may lead to other halakhic problems, so it is only used as a last resort by the authorities that do accept its use.
