Tuesday, January 27, 2026
Monday, January 26, 2026
Conservatives, liberals shift gun rights arguments after shooting
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/01/25/alex-pretti-gun-debate-second-amendment/
The killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis has scrambled America’s gun debate, another reflection of the bitterness and polarization that have engulfed the dispute over the national crackdown on immigration by federal agents.
With Americans split between those supporting the Trump administration and those backing anti-ICE protesters, multiple conservatives — including those strongly supportive of gun rights in the past — have justified Pretti’s shooting on the grounds that his carrying of a holstered gun showed he had violent intentions.
Those positions are at odds with the usual stance of many gun rights supporters, who often defend the rights of Americans to carry firearms in almost all situations.
NRA Makes Rare Statement Against Trump Admin Over Alex Pretti Shooting
The National Rifle Association (NRA) criticized comments by a senior federal prosecutor warning that approaching law enforcement with a gun could justify a fatal police response, saying such statements risk "demonizing law‑abiding citizens" as the nation reels from the killing of a man in Minneapolis by a U.S. border agent.
The NRA was responding to remarks by Bill Essayli, the first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, who said that "if you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you," adding, "Don’t do it." In a statement, the gun‑rights group called that view "dangerous and wrong," urging public officials to refrain from broad generalizations and to wait for the outcome of a full investigation into Alex Pretti’s death.
"Furthermore, we condemn the untoward comments of Bill Essayli. Federal agents are not ‘highly likely’ to be ‘legally justified’ in ‘shooting’ concealed carry licensees who approach while lawfully carrying a firearm. The Second Amendment protects Americans' right to bear arms while protesting—a right the federal government must not infringe upon.
Assisted-Suicide Chapter Amendments coming to a vote in Albany this week, by Wed
BS"D
https://links.mkt3536.com/
Rabbi Noson Shmuel Leiter,
Executive Director,
Help Rescue Our Children
845.642.1679
Direct: 771.215.8892
Israeli Helpline: 03.721.3337
Tomim Tih'yeh [countering "New-Age" infiltration]:
Presentations on New-Age dangers: 605-313-6831 ext. 2
Heard weekly on New Jersey's WSNR Radio 620AM, co-hosting the renowned Levin At Eleven program, every Thursday evening, 11pm to midnight (ET).
The unjust killing of Alex Pretti marks a turning point in Trump’s second term
The unjust killing of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old nurse in Minneapolis, marks a turning point in President Donald Trump’s second term. His mass deportation campaign has been a moral and political failure, leaving American citizens feeling outraged and unsafe.
The outrageous refusal by the feds to allow local authorities to properly secure the crime scene or gather evidence further inflames tensions with state and city police. The lack of accountability for federal officers has undermined the administration’s claims that this is about law and order. The local population clearly wants the roughly 3,000 immigration officers now deployed around the Twin Cities to leave.
It’s essential that federal immigration officers don’t think they can act with impunity, because that will only encourage more fatal encounters. An independent probe of this shooting is an important step. On Saturday night, a federal judge ordered DHS not to destroy evidence related to Pretti’s killing in response to a lawsuit filed by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D).
Trump Says Administration Is ‘Reviewing Everything’ About Minneapolis Shooting
President Trump declined to say whether the federal officer who fatally shot a man in Minnesota this weekend had acted appropriately and said the administration was reviewing the incident.
In a five-minute telephone interview with The Wall Street Journal on Sunday, Trump didn’t directly answer when asked twice whether the officer who shot Alex Pretti had done the right thing. Pressed further, the president said, “We’re looking, we’re reviewing everything and will come out with a determination.” Administration officials have publicly defended the officer
Sunday, January 25, 2026
Federal agent secured gun from Minn. man before fatal shooting, videos show
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/01/25/minneapolis-shooting-video-gun/
Federal agents who were wrestling a man to the ground in Minneapolis early Saturday secured a handgun he was carrying moments before shooting him multiple times, according to a Washington Post analysis of videos that captured the incident from several angles.
As many as eight agents were attempting to detain Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, videos show. One emerged from the scrum holding Pretti’s gun, and less than a second later, the first of what appear to be 10 shots was fired. It is not clear from the video whether the other agents realized Pretti — who local authorities believe had a permit to carry the weapon — had been disarmed
US immigration officers kill man in Minnesota, apparently falsely saying he brandished a gun
Drew Evans, superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said during a news conference that federal officers blocked his agency from the shooting scene, and when they returned with a signed judicial warrant, they were still blocked.
Anger in Israel at US special envoy Steve Witkoff
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/421404
Israeli official claims: “Witkoff pushed to bring our major rival Turkey to the border. The clock is ticking backward toward a confrontation with Turkey."
AGUDACOLYPSE: Timing is not everything, but it is a statement about how unimportant Assisted Suicide in NY is on the Aguda Totem pole.
Rabbosai,
Minnesota officials at odds with DHS over account of man killed by federal agent as new videos emerge
https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news/ice-minneapolis-shooting-01-24-26
• Deadly shooting: Video appears to show a federal officer had taken a gun away from a Minneapolis man prior to a Border Patrol agent fatally shooting him today. The man has been identified as Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old who sources say worked as an ICU nurse. Police said he’s believed to have been a lawful gun owner with a permit to carry.
• Clashing narratives: The Department of Homeland Security has said the agent killed Pretti in self-defense — a narrative Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz called “nonsense” and “lies.” Minnesota authorities also sued the Trump administration, claiming its officials “took from the scene” of the shooting and prevented state officials from inspecting.
US immigration officers kill man in Minnesota, apparently falsely saying he brandished a gun
Video shows ICU nurse Alex Pretti, 37, was holding a phone, not a firearm, when officers accosted him and then shot him dead; local cops describe him as a lawful gun owner
State, federal officials offer starkly different accounts of Minneapolis shooting
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/01/24/federal-agents-minneapolis-shooting-investigation/
One of the officers pushes a person who appears to be a bystander or protester down onto the sidewalk. Pretti steps between them, and the officer pepper sprays him in the face.
Pretti begins to interact with the person who was pushed, but the exchange cannot be heard. An officer appears to try to pull him away, leading to the scuffle in which Pretti is fatally shot.
An unnamed witness to the shooting said in a sworn affidavit that they did not see Pretti with a gun.
Saturday, January 24, 2026
Trump rages at NYT survey, says ‘fake’ polling should be criminal offense?
https://thehill.com/homenews/5703471-trump-attacks-poll-voter-disapproval/?tbref=hp
This week, The New York Times and Siena University released a poll showing a majority of Americans disapprove of how President Trump is handling the economy, immigration, foreign policy and affordability. A full 51 percent say his policies have made life less affordable. Nearly half of voters — 49 percent — believe the country is worse off than a year ago.
But instead of addressing the substance of the concerns, Trump took to Truth Social to attack the poll itself.
Trump argues Republicans are fixing an economy damaged by President Biden. But Americans don’t live in talking points, they live in monthly bills. Inflation is up 2.7 percent year-over-year. The typical household is spending $184 more per month than last year, and $590 more each month than they did three years ago, according to Moody’s Analytics. Grocery prices haven’t meaningfully come down. Energy, medical care, coffee and ground beef all cost more.
Suing pollsters and attacking the press won’t lower grocery prices, won’t stabilize energy costs, and won’t make life more affordable. Governing will. And right now, voters are saying — clearly — they want less outrage and more results
Friday, January 23, 2026
Trump sparks anger over claim Nato troops avoided Afghanistan front line
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czr444j671vo
Donald Trump has sparked fresh outrage in the UK after saying Nato troops stayed "a little off the front lines" during the war in Afghanistan.
Labour MP Emily Thornberry, the chair of the foreign affairs committee, called it an "absolute insult" to the 457 British service personnel killed in the conflict, while Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: "How dare he question their sacrifice?"
Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty, who served in Afghanistan, said it was "sad to see our nation's sacrifice, and that of our Nato partners, held so cheaply".
The US president told Fox News on Thursday that he was "not sure" the military alliance would be there for America "if we ever needed them".
"We've never needed them," he said, adding: "We have never really asked anything of them."
"They'll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan," he said, "and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines".
He said the US had "been very good to Europe and to many other countries", adding: "It has to be a two-way street."
What’s Going on With the Epstein Files? A Month After Deadline, the Vast Majority of Materials Remain Unreleased
https://time.com/7355932/epstein-files-release-doj-independent-monitor-house-investigation/
More than a month has passed since the deadline for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release all its files related to the investigations into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. And while the department has publicly shared thousands of documents since that date, those releases account for only a fraction of the materials it has in its possession—leaving the vast majority of the so-called “Epstein files” still unreleased.
In a letter to Comer, the Clintons’ lawyers said that the subpoenas they received “are invalid and legally unenforceable, untethered to a valid legislative purpose, unwarranted because they do not seek pertinent information, and an unprecedented infringement on the separation of powers.” Their lawyers said that the couple has “already provided the limited information they possess about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to the committee.”
Thursday, January 22, 2026
How Trump Outfoxed Himself
https://time.com/7353732/trump-outfoxed-himself/
President Donald Trump kicked off the new year with a cacophony of policy decisions which have diverted attention from his disastrous 2025.
The first year of Trump 2.0 has been soundly rated a failure in all major national polls and in each dimension of national and international priorities. Gallup found that only 36% of Americans approve of the President’s job performance. And according to a CNN poll, just 37% of Americans say that Trump places the good of the country above his personal gain and 32% say that he’s in touch with the problems ordinary Americans face in their daily lives.
Faced with high levels of unemployment, an affordability crisis, and being named in the Epstein files multiple times, Trump has unleashed a blizzard of divisive actions. He has attempted to change public discourse to focus on an alarmist hunt for enemies abroad, through his aggressions against Venezuela and Greenland, and at home, through his unpopular and violent ICE raids and attacks against Federal Reserve Chair, Jerome Powell.
Some have concluded that Trump’s frenzy is the arbitrary approach of a deranged demagogue. “Trump does not appear to have control of his mental faculties,” asserts historian Heather Cox Richardson. “When people talk about that ‘Oh he shouldn’t do this? He can’t do this? Why is he doing this?’ and so on—you don’t make those arguments about people who don’t have any logical reason for anything they are doing excerpt perhaps, ‘I wanna feel good about myself and make lots of money.”
But this perspective misses an important point: Trump keeps getting what he wants.
The philosopher Abraham Kaplan referred to this as “the law of instrument.” Using the same hammer with increasing fevered frenzy is not going to address the challenge when a different approach, like perhaps a saw or a wrench, is needed. Trump needs to adopt new unfamiliar leadership tools which he has no experience using and which are unknown to his current sycophantic advisors.
Trump’s Greenland offramp
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/21/greenland-trump-tariffs-davos-nato/
At Davos, the president defuses a crisis he created.
The only good thing to say about the great Greenland crisis of 2026 is that it’s probably over. Anyone looking for any benefits associated with this exercise is wasting their time.
The retreat from confrontation came in response to backlash from global financial markets, especially bond futures. European leaders even showed some backbone. (Take note, congressional Republicans.)
The biggest risk of the Greenland kerfuffle is that Trump signaled to NATO’s adversaries that the U.S. is not fully committed to defending all member states if they come under attack in the future. On Denmark selling Greenland, for example, Trump said: “You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative. Or you can say no, and we will remember.”
Ty Cobb: ‘Significant decline’ in Trump mental faculties
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5698558-trump-health-fitness-cobb/?tbref=hp
Former White House attorney Ty Cobb claimed President Trump is experiencing a “significant decline” in his mental faculties, pointing to the commander in chief’s Tuesday appearance at a White House press briefing to mark the anniversary of his return to the Oval Office.
“I think there’s been a significant decline. He’s always been driven by narcissism. But I think the dementia and the cognitive decline are, you know, palpable, as do many experts, including many physicians,” Cobb told MS NOW’s Ari Melber on “The Beat,” in comments highlighted by
Progress toward peace in Ukraine was unlikely before Trump’s Davos rant. Now it looks all but impossible
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/21/europe/analysis-ukraine-greenland-trump-davos-latam-intl
There were hopes Davos would bring Trump together with Europe’s key leaders and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky around an $800bn “prosperity” deal for a peacetime Ukraine, and the cementing of US security guarantees for Kyiv. It did not. In a rambling speech that lasted more than an hour, Trump referenced both Zelensky and French President Emmanuel Macron being in the audience when in fact both had stayed away, believing little progress toward peace was likely.
What will greet Zelensky on arrival is more concerning: a hostile and unpredictable US president who seems to flippantly eviscerate his country’s longest-standing allies, mock their leaders, and then find he has loathing to spare for windmills. Trump repeated his claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted a deal on Ukraine – despite little public evidence to support it – and that Zelensky did too. Steve Witkoff, the presidential envoy to the war, is once again due to meet Putin Thursday, possibly after a Trump and Zelensky meeting in Davos. The mayhem of the past week radically decreases the already slim chance of a genuine peace deal.
Haredi teen hit by bus and killed; police suspect driver of reckless manslaughter
In video, passengers heard expressing concern vehicle moving too fast given the large number of people wandering in road near Komemiyut; second such fatal incident this month
Wednesday, January 21, 2026
ICE targeted off-duty police officers in Twin Cities, local police say
Mark Bruley, police chief of Minneapolis suburb Brooklyn Park, said at a Tuesday news conference that an off-duty police officer had been “boxed … in” by vehicles driven by ICE agents, who demanded with guns drawn to see paperwork proving the officer had a right to be in the United States. “She’s a U.S. citizen, and clearly would not have any paperwork,” he said.
The officer attempted to begin filming the interaction and her phone was knocked out of her hand, Bruley said. When she identified herself as a police officer, the federal agents “immediately left,” he said.
All of the off-duty police officers who had been targeted by ICE in his city were people of color,✓ Bruley said.
“I wish I could tell you that this was an isolated incident,” he said, adding, “if it is happening to our officers, it pains me to think how many of our community members are falling victim to this every day.”
Trump administration admits DOGE accessed personal Social Security data
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/01/20/doge-social-security-data-privacy-act/
A DOGE employee signed an agreement to share Social Security data with the aim of overturning election results in certain states, according to a new court filing.
The disclosures amount to a notable reversal by Social Security officials, who had previously claimed there was no evidence that DOGE had potentially compromised personal data. In August, after former chief data officer Charles Borges told Congress and others that DOGE was storing Americans’ data in an unsafe environment, the agency told The Washington Post it was “not aware of any compromise to this environment” and remains “dedicated to protecting sensitive personal data.”
The new disclosures came in response to a lawsuit brought by unions and an advocacy group in February attempting to block DOGE from accessing SSA data. A judge had temporarily barred DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the agency, saying that DOGE “essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion.” The Supreme Court later lifted that injunction.
The agency also acknowledged for the first time that DOGE members were using links to share data through a third-party server called Cloudflare, which is not approved for sharing Social Security data. SSA said it was unaware of the sharing until recently and doesn’t know what was shared.
A Jewish Perspective Opposing Physician-Assisted Suicide in New York State:
Reject the Medical Aid in Dying Act (S138/A136)
To the Honorable Members of the New York State Senate:
Our organization, Ematai (www.ematai.org), is a New York-based non-profit organization that helps Jews navigate their healthcare journeys with Jewish wisdom. We assist members of the Jewish community in dealing with the difficult emotional and ethical dilemmas of aging, end-of-life care, and organ donation. We also guide Jewish healthcare professionals in addressing ethical qualms regarding their holy profession. The potential legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is of grave concern to the Jewish community. We urge you to vote against the Medical Aid in Dying Act (S138). One of the basic principles of our worldview is that the fundamental goal of medicine is to heal. We all have an obligation to care, in a wide variety of ways, for the ill and those in need. Doctors have a unique responsibility to heal, i.e., to use their skills toward curing their patients to the greatest extent possible. As the Bible teaches, “And you shall surely heal” (Exodus 21:12). Physician-assisted suicide is a distortion of this great calling. It will undermine the unique role of a physician as healer, whose primary responsibility must remain to "Do No Harm." Healthcare professionals did not enter this great field
for the sake of actively helping people die. We cannot sully this great profession. Another great concern is that PAS will be used by the most vulnerable people in society. The National Council on Disability published a study that detailed the dangers of assisted suicide laws to people with disabilities. It found that "safeguards" in these laws are, “ineffective and often fail to protect patients.” On many occasions, they are simply being dismissed as “barriers” to the (cheaper) alternative of helping someone end their life. This is a well-founded fear that should be heeded by conservatives and liberals alike. The introduction of PAS, moreover, can undermine patient trust that their physician always has their best interest in mind. We cannot allow for the breakdown of this sensitive and crucial relationship. Another area of concern is that the legalization of PAS will trample on the liberties of Jews, Christians, Muslims, and physicians of all faiths or no faith who are conscientiously against helping someone kill themselves. Doctors who entered this holy profession for the sake of healing cannot be asked to participate, even indirectly, in someone committing suicide. Finally, the introduction of PAS may become an unacceptable “quick-fix” to offering true palliative care measures toward suffering patients. Physicians have made great strides in palliative care and pain control, and only rarely do patients request assisted suicide for intractable pain. In fact, pain does not even make it into the top five reasons that patients seek out assisted suicide. According to data from Oregon, the state where assisted suicide has been legal the longest, the top five reasons include: being less able to engage in enjoyable activities, loss of autonomy, loss of dignity, being a burden on family/friends, and losing control of bodily functions. These are serious existential concerns that must be addressed - but with multidisciplinary care, not assisted suicide. We should not be terminating life because of these issues. Instead, we must increase the full range of medical and social services, in partnership with faith-based initiatives and other local communal resources. Let us refuse this technical fix and rise to the occasion by acting humanely in the presence of finitude. The dying need our presence and our encouragement. In the face of death, the treatment of choice is and always will be company and care.
Respectfully,
Rabbi Shlomo Brody, PhD Rabbi Aaron Glatt, MD
Executive Director Chair, Department of Medicine
Ematai Mt Sinai South Nassau Hospital
brody@ematai.org Ematai Rabbinic Advisory Board
Open Letter vs. Assisted Suicide in NY
BS"D
Urgent: re S8835/ A9515:An Open Letter to NY State Legislators
January 21, '26/ 3 Shvat 5786/ Parshas BoDear Legislator,
We hereby express our deepest objections to looming Assisted Suicide legislation, A9515 /S8835, "Chapter Amendments" demanded by Gov. Hochul* to enable her to sign the Assisted Suicide bill for which the NY Legislature voted last year (S138/A136).
These objections are shared throughout all of our communities. See, for example, the broad based Rabbinic Statement posted here: https://daattorah.blogspot.com/2025/05/psak- halacha.html, and the OU statement:
We also know that together we can do better than that for the terminally ill than this - with advanced pain-control and appropriate emotional person-to-person support.The Torah Perspective on Suicide:In addressing the parameters of murder, Judaism unequivocally forbids suicide. The prohibition against suicide is one that extends to all Mankind. When G-d commanded Noach - to relay to all Mankind - the prohibition of murder (Genesis 9:5), He started by saying:"... [For] Your [spilt] blood - {the taking of} your lives - I will demand justice ..."Our Sages (in Midrash Rabbah (Beraishis Rabbah)) on that verse, as quoted by Rash"i, received a Divine Tradition elucidating this verse as referring to the prohibition of suicide.The severity of the prohibition of murder is such that even to kill a person on death's doorstep in order to save a young, healthy person with many healthy years ahead of them is unquestionably prohibited as murder, akin to any other form of murder.Judaism deems murder so repugnant that even those loosely associated with it earn the stigma articulated by the Targum Yonoson Ben Uziel (in the elucidated Aramaic translation, dating back millennia), on The Ten Commandments, elucidates the verse "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13), as follows:"My Nation, the Children of Yisrael: You shall not be murderers, nor shall you be friendly acquaintances or partners with murderers, nor shall there appear amongst you those who are associated with murderers - in order that your children not follow your example and learn to associate with murderers, ..."*{* loose translation}From Maimonides, in his Mishneh Torah (Code of Law), in The Laws of the Murderer and Preservation of Life, 1:15-16, we learn that if someone is capable of saving someone's else life and fails to do so, then the Torah deems it as if he actively "destroyed the entire world." (See Avos D'Rebbi Nosson 31:2.)Consequently, if we fail to do everything within our power to stop this Assisted Suicide legislation - then it is we who would earn the dishonor of being deemed destroyers of the entire world.
As bad as murder is, institutionalizing any form of murder is infinitely worse.Additionally, our objections are not limited to our opposition to murder in principle. This legislation poses many real and present dangers to us, practically speaking. The most vulnerable members of our communities, along with members of the general community - such as the mentally ill and the severely depressed - stand at gravest risk of victimization and exploitation under this legislation.For example, the mentally ill are not protected before (due to the bill's weak definition of "capable") - and certainly not after (there is no provision to remove the poison from a person with dementia) - the lethal prescription is filled.• This bill allows the doctor to suggest poison to a patient in distress. That enables the doctor to take advantage of a vulnerable patient who was just informed that they are going to die. The doctor would have the legal right to offer the forlorn patient an option of suicide. In that bleak circumstance, that's akin to directing - if not even coercing - the patient into taking the poison.
• There is much potential for fraud and abuse that is hardwired into this legislation explicitly, and far more so by omission of obviously necessary safeguards. For example, it doesn't even require checking the signatures for forgeries• The bill forces both religious and conscientious objectors to collaborate in the killing process, by requiring them to forward medical records, thereby enabling the murder. A Jewish doctor had sued NJ over just such a provision - and lost. (See "Addendum: How Assisted Suicide In Fact Constitutes an Antireligious Edict," below.)• This legislation also raises alarms of degrading care, particularly by medical staff, and insurance companies. As medical standards degrade, so will the medical care that the insurance covers.• This bill redefines defines the word "Medication" - from something that is per se beneficial - to include poison. This mutation will fundamentally alter the way medicine is practiced, endangering many in the long-term.• A doctor who multitasks in both healing and killing will never be the same doctor who will go to all lengths to save. We insist on our autonomy - the right to have a doctor who only heals. Under this legislation, will be unable to identify and choose doctors who never collaborate in killing.• Legislation like this discourages religious people from entering the medical profession.• It also proliferates distrust of medical professionals within our communities, distrust which has recently hit alarming, all time highs - both in our communities, and in the state at large.• The Torah exhorts us that one sin leads to another. We observe this playing out in actual practice. In all other locations in which assisted suicide has passed, protections and other conditions always get changed - for the worse. This could occur by a court deciding that certain safeguards are undue burdens (a hazard that this bill's Severability Clause enables). It could also occur via future legislation weakening protections.In reality, such legislative degradation is guaranteed - since proponents of this bill are unhappy with this compromise. Many controversial laws pass with certain conditions to appease some of the less intense opposition. However, generally, those conditions are subsequently voted away with little to no news coverage.We beseech you, please do not partake in the wanton self-destruction of Civilization - please vote against all forms of Assisted-Suicide and/or Euthanasia. We cannot vote for those who advance this evil.Our Sages observe:"Some acquire their share in the World-To-Come in a single moment ..."
Rabbi Noson Shmuel Leiter,
Executive Director,
Help Rescue Our Children
845.642.1679
Direct: 771.215.8892
Israeli Helpline: 03.721.3337
Tomim Tih'yeh [countering "New-Age" infiltration]:
Presentations on New-Age dangers: 605-313-6831 ext. 2
Heard weekly on New Jersey's WSNR Radio 620AM, co-hosting the renowned Levin At Eleven program, every Thursday evening, 11pm to midnight (ET).
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
PS: Addendum: How Assisted Suicide Legislation Constitutes an Antireligious Edict
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
Governor Hochul’s Amendments make this lethal legislation more passable by making it ostensibly "safer." Those Amendments just passed the Senate Rules Committee last week (January 12) - making it possible for the full Senate to vote on the bill, S8835, any day now.
The Amendment bill in the Assembly, A9195, has been sitting in the Assembly Health Committee, and is not scheduled for a vote this week. However, it is possible that could change. If it doesn’t change, it is likely that they will vote on it in the Assembly Health Committee - and in the full Assembly - next week, Parshas BeShalach.
The Governor pledged that IF S8835 and A9515 pass, she will sign Assisted-Suicide into Law. IF either S8835 or A9515 do not pass, it's extremely unlikely that she will sign it into Law.
Thus, THE only realistic way to stop Assisted Suicide now is to stop A9515 and S8835 from passing.
It's crucial to realize that even with Governor Hochul’s proposed changes in A9515 and S8835, this legislation would not only “legitimize” assisted suicide - as terrible as that is from the Torah perspective - it would also enable the outright homicide of vulnerabl
The legislators supporting this need to realize that this legislation undermines personal autonomy in the very name of advancing it.
This is due to the remaining loopholes, and due to the absence of a non-severability clause - which would disable the entire bill if any part is declared void -
בטלה מקצתה בטלה כולה.
In a bill without a non-severability clause, even meaningful protections are ultimately worthless, because they can be easily eliminated over time by an activist court - leaving the bill's killing machinery operating at full speed, without those protections.
Thus, these protections in the Amendments ultimately serve to "Aid in Killing," by enabling initial passage of Assisted Suicide. They do not at all protect the vulnerable - in the long term - because the protections/amendments will likely be removed from the bill, over time. This is being done in other places that have passed such bills, due to the absence of a non-severability clause, as explained above, or by subsequent legislation, with little fanfare.
Accordingly, "the Road to Assisted-Suicide is Paved with Amendment Protections."