The tweet linked to further rationale. “The biggest reason you haven’t heard much on NPR about the Post story is that the assertions don’t amount to much,” NPR’s Kelly McBride wrote.
How can you not be cynical? "Unnamed sources" lead to front page stories. Actual evidence? Meh, doesn't amount to much. The bias should concern you instead of makin gyou take a side and parrot the standard lines.
Again, you can't seem to see beyond a team sport with a zero sum end. The press has gone off the rails and is actively working to elect a specific candidate instead of simply presenting what's going on. They are cherry picking, lying and omitting in order to sway the vote. This is the stuff of totalitarian societies. You don't see that?
How can you not be cynical?
ReplyDelete"Unnamed sources" lead to front page stories. Actual evidence? Meh, doesn't amount to much. The bias should concern you instead of makin gyou take a side and parrot the standard lines.
You prefer Trump's proof of Obamagate etc etc?
ReplyDeleteAgain, you can't seem to see beyond a team sport with a zero sum end. The press has gone off the rails and is actively working to elect a specific candidate instead of simply presenting what's going on. They are cherry picking, lying and omitting in order to sway the vote. This is the stuff of totalitarian societies. You don't see that?
ReplyDeletepure fantasy
ReplyDeleteExactly. The liberal press is spinning a fantasy to avoid telling the truth. Finally, we agree!
ReplyDelete