"That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn." - Hillel
who is the fellow in this case? Fellow frum Jews? Or fellow frum Jews who agree with your outlook? Of course, it does not apply to jews with different outlooks, and certainly not to nochrim.
“Response-to-R-Shmuel-Kamenetzky Tamar Friedman Agunah case” I scanned all 53 pages, beautiful, well written, sensitive, humble, updates, good detective work. Bravo Rabbi Spira. I’m prejudiced with Susan and her supporters of Aranoff v Aranoff deeply involved with the Tamar Friedman Agunah case. My latest tactic is to prove lies of judges.
Bible source of מקח טעות is last week’s parsha כי תצא “A man marries a woman and cohabits with her. Then he takes an aversion to her ושנאה and makes up charges against her and defames her, saying, I married this woman; but when I approached her, I found that she was not a virgin. In such a case, the girl’s father and mother shall produce the evidence of the girl’s virginity before the elders of the town at the gate. And the girl’s father shall say to the elders, I gave this man my daughter to wife, but he has taken an aversion to her; so he has made up charges, saying, I did not find your daughter a virgin. But here is the evidence of my daughter’s virginity! And they shall spread out the cloth before the elders of the town. The elders of that town shall then take the man and flog him, and they shall fine him a hundred [shekels of] silver and give it to the girl’s father; for the man has defamed a virgin in Israel. Moreover, she shall remain his wife; he shall never have the right to divorce her. But if the charge proves true, the girl was found not to have been a virgin, then the girl shall be brought out to the entrance of her father’s house, and the men of her town shall stone her to death; for she did a shameful thing in Israel, committing fornication while under her father’s authority. Thus you will sweep away evil from your midst. If a man is found lying with another man’s wife, both of them—the man and the woman with whom he lay—shall die. Thus you will sweep away evil from Israel.” (Deuteronomy 22:13-22).
Surely Tamar would resist relitigate = To litigate again; to sue or pursue legal remedy a second or further time. Courts are extremely reluctant to relitigate. My analysis/opinion. Tamar married Aaron merely to have a baby. After having a baby, Tamar wanted no more children. Oh no. Aaron wants more children. What to do? Demand a divorce. Aaron not cooperating. Scream agunah. Falsely charge Aaron. Get a fake/phony PhD psychology letter. Hire Mendel Epstein for $60,000, etc. Hertz Chumash p. 844: “(d) XXII, 13-XXIII, 9. HOLINESS OF MARRIAGE 13-21. CHARGES AGAINST A BRIDE He who falsely accuses his wife of unchastity during betrothal shall be rebuked, fines, and he loses the right even to divorce her. However, if such charge be true, it is a case of capital punishment.” Tamar falsely accuses her husband Aaron. Tamar should be rebuked and fined. Rabbi Spira’s gives good reasons, in my opinion, to justify his proposal that a bet din should allow Tamar to go back to Aaron saying that Rabbi Kamenitsky and ORA rabbis mislead Tamar. Surely Tamar and her supporters are overjoyed at the Greenblatt marriage of Tamar to Adam. This is like Susan is overjoyed with the fines Rigler $10,000 + $10,000 and Garson $5,000. Tamar will do everything to prevent annulling the Greenblatt marriage of Tamar to Adam. Susan will do everything to prevent the annulling the $25,000 fines against me, follow DT? I agree with Rabbi Spira’s analysis.
“Response-to-R-Shmuel-Kamenetzky Tamar friedman Agunah case” Rabbi Spira’s 53 pages has no mention of assault on Aaron’s on Tisha b’Av 2012. See https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/6242/arrested-rabbi-has-tie-to-area-jewish-divorce-case/news/local-news/
Friedman, who married Tamar Epstein in April 2006, claims to have been beaten up in August of 2012 as he returned his daughter to her mother’s home in the suburbs of Philadelphia. A Lower Merion police department spokesman said at the time that a report had been filed and the matter was under investigation. Epstein’s attorney, Fredric Goldfein, gave an emphatic “no” when asked if Epstein had hired anyone to beat Friedman, adding he wasn’t even sure Friedman’s allegations “amounted to anything.”
Tamar’s attorney, Fredric Goldfein detailed the $60,000 payment to Mendel Epstein and the assault August 2012 of Aaron. Judge Freda gave Fredric Goldfein immunity: Pacer Case 3:14-cr-00287-FLW Document 391 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7703 IT IS this 14th day of December, 2015, ORDERED pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003, that Fredric Goldfein provide testimony or other information which he refuses to provide on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination as to all matters about which he may be questioned. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no testimony or other information compelled under the Order or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information may be used against Fredric Goldfein in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or failing to comply with this Order. Hon. Frea L. Wolfson United States District Judge Lie: Fredric Goldfein, gave an emphatic “no” when asked if Epstein had hired anyone to beat Friedman. The fake/phony PhD psychology letter is a lie. Thank you God I’m in Israel. I have high hopes NYS Court of Appeals will grant my Mo. No. 352 June 29, 2020.
Torah thought on כי תבוא: “Wherefore ועתה I now bring the first fruits of the soil which You, O Lord, have given me. You shall leave it [i.e., the basket of v. 4] before the Lord your God and bow low before the Lord your God. And you shall rejoice ושמחת in all the good הטוב which the Lord your God has given נתן לך you, unto your house ולביתך you אתה and the Levite and the stranger in your midst.” (Deuteronomy 26:10-11). דברים כ"ו (י) וְעַתָּה הִנֵּה הֵבֵאתִי אֶת רֵאשִׁית פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר נָתַתָּה לִּי יְקֹוָק וְהִנַּחְתּוֹ לִפְנֵי יְקֹוָק אֱלֹקֶיךָ וְהִשְׁתַּחֲוִיתָ לִפְנֵי יְקֹוָק אֱלֹקֶיךָ: )יא) וְשָׂמַחְתָּ בְכָל הַטּוֹב אֲשֶׁר נָתַן לְךָ יְקֹוָק אֱלֹקֶיךָ וּלְבֵיתֶךָ אַתָּה וְהַלֵּוִי וְהַגֵּר אֲשֶׁר בְּקִרְבֶּךָ:
Plain reading. Torah commands us come to Jerusalem to bring the first fruits from our property and rejoice for the good God gave us. To rejoice along with our wives and children and along with the Levite and the stranger. Wow, we got property in Israel. Wow, we have children. “When Rachel saw that she had borne Jacob no children, she became envious of her sister; and Rachel said to Jacob, Give me children, or I shall die.” (Genesis 30:1). Wow, we’re healthy. The tochacha, warnings of calamities, the כי תבוא is losing the benefits of Deuteronomy 26:10-11 if we don’t follow Torah laws. My theory of Tamar v Aharon Freidman. Tamar is a modern women’s lib fighter.
Jack Engelhardhttp://www.jackengelhard.com
This means we got it all wrong about the Feminist Movement? Its main point was that women can swear, spit, box, bench press, shoot pool, wrestle, crush beer cans as good as any man. They do not want you to hold the door open for them, nor pay the check after a meal, nor to watch your language in the presence of a lady. No more ‘ladies first” into the lifeboats…unless the ship is really sinking. Chivalry is out. Chivalry Is sexist. Chivalry is dead. Women, the feminists yelled, are not “the gentler sex.” They want to be treated as equals – as men…who are obsolete anyway. Gloria Steinem put it like this – “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” Helen Reddy put it to music – “I am woman, hear me roar. I am invincible.” Unless she lives in the suburbs? Women who live in the suburbs, so busy pampering the kids, the dog and the lawn, never got the word that they’ve been liberated, or so goes the pitch. They are tender damsels, apparently. They are fragile. They must be handled with care. Otherwise they fall to pieces…out there in the burbs. Typical was that lady who was dragged in by Senate Democrats to serve as Brett Kavanaugh’s main accuser upon charges that he misbehaved sexually some 30 years ago. Well, upon questioning, she was not sure when it happened, or if it was really him. So was it all made up? Was she a liar from the word go? Republicans wanted to find out…in fact she was already caught in a fat fib about fear of flying…but they were warned that this witness (or actress), being a woman, is brittle. Further questioning, or any questioning, any at all, could break her and lead to a river of tears…and would lead to accusations that Republicans are monsters. So they clammed up. They surely did not want to lose the women, beginning with their wives. Frankly, I have lived in cities and in suburbs, and have never seen an American woman anything like Christine Blasey Ford and the show she put on…so mousy, so breakable, so frail.” Tamar approved paying $10,000 to kidnap her husband Aharon who didn’t want to divorce her. These kidnappings were horrible. These are modern times. Tamar married Aharon April 2006. God blessed them with a daughter November 2007. Yikes! Separation March 2008 and civil divorce April 2008. My theory is that Tamar is a man-hating lesbian and a modern feminist.
"That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn." - Hillel
ReplyDeletewho is the fellow in this case? Fellow frum Jews? Or fellow frum Jews who agree with your outlook? Of course, it does not apply to jews with different outlooks, and certainly not to nochrim.
“Response-to-R-Shmuel-Kamenetzky Tamar Friedman Agunah case”
ReplyDeleteI scanned all 53 pages, beautiful, well written, sensitive, humble, updates, good detective work. Bravo Rabbi Spira. I’m prejudiced with Susan and her supporters of Aranoff v Aranoff deeply involved with the Tamar Friedman Agunah case. My latest tactic is to prove lies of judges.
Bible source of מקח טעות is last week’s parsha כי תצא “A man marries a woman and cohabits with her. Then he takes an aversion to her ושנאה and makes up charges against her and defames her, saying, I married this woman; but when I approached her, I found that she was not a virgin. In such a case, the girl’s father and mother shall produce the evidence of the girl’s virginity before the elders of the town at the gate. And the girl’s father shall say to the elders, I gave this man my daughter to wife, but he has taken an aversion to her; so he has made up charges, saying, I did not find your daughter a virgin. But here is the evidence of my daughter’s virginity! And they shall spread out the cloth before the elders of the town. The elders of that town shall then take the man and flog him, and they shall fine him a hundred [shekels of] silver and give it to the girl’s father; for the man has defamed a virgin in Israel. Moreover, she shall remain his wife; he shall never have the right to divorce her. But if the charge proves true, the girl was found not to have been a virgin, then the girl shall be brought out to the entrance of her father’s house, and the men of her town shall stone her to death; for she did a shameful thing in Israel, committing fornication while under her father’s authority. Thus you will sweep away evil from your midst. If a man is found lying with another man’s wife, both of them—the man and the woman with whom he lay—shall die. Thus you will sweep away evil from Israel.” (Deuteronomy 22:13-22).
Surely Tamar would resist relitigate = To litigate again; to sue or pursue legal remedy a second or further time. Courts are extremely reluctant to relitigate. My analysis/opinion. Tamar married Aaron merely to have a baby. After having a baby, Tamar wanted no more children. Oh no. Aaron wants more children. What to do? Demand a divorce. Aaron not cooperating. Scream agunah. Falsely charge Aaron. Get a fake/phony PhD psychology letter. Hire Mendel Epstein for $60,000, etc.
ReplyDeleteHertz Chumash p. 844: “(d) XXII, 13-XXIII, 9. HOLINESS OF MARRIAGE 13-21. CHARGES AGAINST A BRIDE He who falsely accuses his wife of unchastity during betrothal shall be rebuked, fines, and he loses the right even to divorce her. However, if such charge be true, it is a case of capital punishment.”
Tamar falsely accuses her husband Aaron. Tamar should be rebuked and fined. Rabbi Spira’s gives good reasons, in my opinion, to justify his proposal that a bet din should allow Tamar to go back to Aaron saying that Rabbi Kamenitsky and ORA rabbis mislead Tamar. Surely Tamar and her supporters are overjoyed at the Greenblatt marriage of Tamar to Adam. This is like Susan is overjoyed with the fines Rigler $10,000 + $10,000 and Garson $5,000. Tamar will do everything to prevent annulling the Greenblatt marriage of Tamar to Adam. Susan will do everything to prevent the annulling the $25,000 fines against me, follow DT? I agree with Rabbi Spira’s analysis.
“Response-to-R-Shmuel-Kamenetzky Tamar friedman Agunah case”
ReplyDeleteRabbi Spira’s 53 pages has no mention of assault on Aaron’s on Tisha b’Av 2012. See
https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/6242/arrested-rabbi-has-tie-to-area-jewish-divorce-case/news/local-news/
Friedman, who married Tamar Epstein in April 2006, claims to have been beaten up in August of 2012 as he returned his daughter to her mother’s home in the suburbs of Philadelphia. A Lower Merion police department spokesman said at the time that a report had been filed and the matter was under investigation. Epstein’s attorney, Fredric Goldfein, gave an emphatic “no” when asked if Epstein had hired anyone to beat Friedman, adding he wasn’t even sure Friedman’s allegations “amounted to anything.”
Tamar’s attorney, Fredric Goldfein detailed the $60,000 payment to Mendel Epstein and the assault August 2012 of Aaron. Judge Freda gave Fredric Goldfein immunity: Pacer Case 3:14-cr-00287-FLW Document 391 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 7703
IT IS this 14th day of December, 2015,
ORDERED pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003, that Fredric Goldfein provide testimony or other information which he refuses to provide on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination as to all matters about which he may be questioned. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no testimony or other information compelled under the Order or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information may be used against Fredric Goldfein in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or failing to comply with this Order. Hon. Frea L. Wolfson United States District Judge
Lie: Fredric Goldfein, gave an emphatic “no” when asked if Epstein had hired anyone to beat Friedman. The fake/phony PhD psychology letter is a lie. Thank you God I’m in Israel. I have high hopes NYS Court of Appeals will grant my Mo. No. 352 June 29, 2020.
Torah thought on כי תבוא: “Wherefore ועתה I now bring the first fruits of the soil which You, O Lord, have given me. You shall leave it [i.e., the basket of v. 4] before the Lord your God and bow low before the Lord your God. And you shall rejoice ושמחת in all the good הטוב which the Lord your God has given נתן לך you, unto your house ולביתך you אתה and the Levite and the stranger in your midst.” (Deuteronomy 26:10-11).
ReplyDeleteדברים כ"ו
(י) וְעַתָּה הִנֵּה הֵבֵאתִי אֶת רֵאשִׁית פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר נָתַתָּה לִּי יְקֹוָק וְהִנַּחְתּוֹ לִפְנֵי יְקֹוָק אֱלֹקֶיךָ וְהִשְׁתַּחֲוִיתָ לִפְנֵי יְקֹוָק אֱלֹקֶיךָ:
)יא) וְשָׂמַחְתָּ בְכָל הַטּוֹב אֲשֶׁר נָתַן לְךָ יְקֹוָק אֱלֹקֶיךָ וּלְבֵיתֶךָ אַתָּה וְהַלֵּוִי וְהַגֵּר אֲשֶׁר בְּקִרְבֶּךָ:
Plain reading. Torah commands us come to Jerusalem to bring the first fruits from our property and rejoice for the good God gave us. To rejoice along with our wives and children and along with the Levite and the stranger. Wow, we got property in Israel. Wow, we have children. “When Rachel saw that she had borne Jacob no children, she became envious of her sister; and Rachel said to Jacob, Give me children, or I shall die.” (Genesis 30:1). Wow, we’re healthy. The tochacha, warnings of calamities, the כי תבוא is losing the benefits of Deuteronomy 26:10-11 if we don’t follow Torah laws.
My theory of Tamar v Aharon Freidman. Tamar is a modern women’s lib fighter.
Jack Engelhardhttp://www.jackengelhard.com
This means we got it all wrong about the Feminist Movement?
Its main point was that women can swear, spit, box, bench press, shoot pool, wrestle, crush beer cans as good as any man. They do not want you to hold the door open for them, nor pay the check after a meal, nor to watch your language in the presence of a lady. No more ‘ladies first” into the lifeboats…unless the ship is really sinking. Chivalry is out. Chivalry Is sexist. Chivalry is dead. Women, the feminists yelled, are not “the gentler sex.” They want to be treated as equals – as men…who are obsolete anyway. Gloria Steinem put it like this – “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” Helen Reddy put it to music – “I am woman, hear me roar. I am invincible.” Unless she lives in the suburbs? Women who live in the suburbs, so busy pampering the kids, the dog and the lawn, never got the word that they’ve been liberated, or so goes the pitch. They are tender damsels, apparently. They are fragile. They must be handled with care. Otherwise they fall to pieces…out there in the burbs. Typical was that lady who was dragged in by Senate Democrats to serve as Brett Kavanaugh’s main accuser upon charges that he misbehaved sexually some 30 years ago. Well, upon questioning, she was not sure when it happened, or if it was really him. So was it all made up? Was she a liar from the word go? Republicans wanted to find out…in fact she was already caught in a fat fib about fear of flying…but they were warned that this witness (or actress), being a woman, is brittle. Further questioning, or any questioning, any at all, could break her and lead to a river of tears…and would lead to accusations that Republicans are monsters. So they clammed up. They surely did not want to lose the women, beginning with their wives. Frankly, I have lived in cities and in suburbs, and have never seen an American woman anything like Christine Blasey Ford and the show she put on…so mousy, so breakable, so frail.”
Tamar approved paying $10,000 to kidnap her husband Aharon who didn’t want to divorce her. These kidnappings were horrible. These are modern times. Tamar married Aharon April 2006. God blessed them with a daughter November 2007. Yikes! Separation March 2008 and civil divorce April 2008. My theory is that Tamar is a man-hating lesbian and a modern feminist.