i SUSPECT THIS LETTER IS SOMEONE i HAD AN EXTENSIVE CORRESPONDENCE WITH BY EMAIL WHO FELT A NEED TO LEAVE HAR NOF BECAUSE THE COMMUNITY MADE HIM AND HIS FAMILY FEEL UNWANTED BECAUSE OF CRIMES HE COMMITTED AND WENT TO JAIL FOR I PRESENTED SOME OF HIS VIEWS ON THIS BLOG WITH HIS PERMISSION BUT HE STILL BLAMES ME FOR HIS REJECTION BY THE COMMUNITY
I read your article it reminded me of what you did to me while wearing your Chareidi style oversized crown black hat jacket white shirt and tzitsis flowing .[sic]
I came to you as per advise of a Rav in Har Nof for help and comfort.
Instead you turned on me, tried everything in your self-serving megalomaniac ways to wreck my life.
I and my family got crippled by you
after many years we recovered from your blows I would say at 95% .
The Chareidy Lady pushing the carriage into you on your way to Shachris is a temporary pain
a temporary inconvenience.
8 year old who spent all of mincha staring at You standing unsteadily AT THE BACK OF THE SHUL BECAUSE NONE OF THE AVREICHIM WANTED TO GIVE UP THEIR SEATS.
a temporary chutzpah. You can always find another Shul to daven in.
but your underhanded actions will stain me and my family forever.
this person never met me as is clear from his description of me and his false claims about what i did to him and his family
“an incredible stupid comment from someone I never met”
ReplyDeleteHere’s an example of an incredible stupid act of Susan, Daattorah, may I tell you?
June 19, 2017 sent a package to the NYS Court of Appeals that included the Rigler 2000 decision. What’s incredibly stupid about it? The judges now see the fraud and must calendar my motion 2018-36:
“Then the Lord said, The outrage of Sodom and Gomorrah is so great, and their sin so grave! I will go down to see whether they have acted altogether according to the outcry that has reached Me; if not, I will take note.” (Genesis 18:20-21).
Susan writes June 19, 2000: “Judge Rigler’s September 12, 2000 ORDER (See attached) further ordered and directed “the Clerk of the Court not to accept any further motions in this action other than to perfect an appeal, or any other action by him until he pays the full $20,000 in sanctions owed by him.”
Rigler 2000: “The Court directs the plaintiff-wife to cooperate with the Commissioner in providing information regarding all of defendant-husband’s assets in this country, so that the Commissioner can take appropriate action to collect the sanctions award.”
I don't remember all the interactions that I had with people over the years, and how people might have perceived my actions.
ReplyDeleteI would challenge the writer to give some details about why he came to see you, how he feels his life was nearly wrecked, and how this affected his family.
You never wore a black hat? Never had your tzitzis stick out?
ReplyDeleteMaybe he embellished things, or his memory is playing tricks on him from years ago.
What do you have to lose by challenging him?
and therefore?
ReplyDeletehis vivid description of me is totally wrong
ReplyDeleteYOU claim that you never met.
ReplyDelete"this person never met me as is clear from his description of me and his false claims about what i did to him and his family"
HE claims that he DID meet you, seeking help and comfort.
"I came to you as per advise of a Rav in Har Nof for help and comfort.
Instead you turned on me, tried everything in your self-serving megalomaniac ways to wreck my life."
You can either publicly debunk his lies, or in case your mind is playing tricks on you, and there was some type of incident that you forgot about, then you can take steps to make ammends before 120.
ReplyDeletedespite his claims we never met
ReplyDeleteAllow me to elaborate, Daattorah, on why judges that see a crime must rule on the crime and not tell the victim to go to the police or DA. See, if Aharon, for example, would go to the police or DA to complain that his mother-in-law hired goons to physically assault him, the police/DA would say: Take a number and get on line. Which line? The line for in-laws hiring goons to break a leg of the husband, which is 3 miles long and has people camping and sleeping on the line.
ReplyDeleteI quote Judge Eric I. Prus August 1, 2013: “Let the record reflect that a judgment of separation was issued by Justice William Rigler on March 1995.”
The NYS Court of Appeals cannot tell me to go to the police/DA to complain on Judge Prus. The police/DA would give me a number and tell me wait on line, a line 3 miles long. Follow?
@daattorah, I don’t see any arguments from you and so I guess you don’t even want to argue. You just want us to believe what YOU SAY and that’s it. While I don’t know who is wrong or right it’s a fifty fifty Chance that either of you is. You have no more chazuke on emes than the other guy at this point.
ReplyDeleteI can clearly see a difference in your mood and style of posts after the stroke and before. I don’t get your agenda anymore.
Do you?
“an incredible stupid comment from someone I never met”
ReplyDeleteHere’s an example of an incredible stupid act of Judge Eric I. Prus, Daattorah, may I tell you? Transcript 1/8/2013 “THE COURT: Okay. I'm going to order a Judgment of divorce based upon the separation judgment to the plaintiff. I'm going to award the premises at 498 East 18th Street, Brooklyn, New York to the plaintiff as well based upon the defendant's abandonment of the plaintiff since 1991 and the plaintiff's continuement to maintain the property for a period of time since 1991 through the present day.”
Why is this incredible stupid? Smarter would be to award Susan the divorce and the house upon the same basis of abandonment. Abandonment doesn’t become stale, old, out-of-date, useless, irrelevant. A court order of separation of March 1995, after the one year, Susan would be expected to file for contested divorce fairly fast. Susan waiting until 2013. By then the 1995 Order of Separation is pure garbage, follow? This is like the Kamenetsky heter is pure garbage.
“an incredible stupid comment from someone I never met”
ReplyDeleteAllow me, Daattorah, to add. Checks and similar can always be post dated. Gamara, daf hayomi talks of note written in the year 500 with a date 506---that’s ok.
Avodah Zarah 10a
“six years ahead [Its date was six years later than the time when it was claimed to be due e.g. 516 instead of 510 (Seleucid Era)]. The Rabbis who were sitting before Raba were of opinion that it should be pronounced a post-dated document, which is to be deferred and not executed until the date which it bears.”
It is a crime to date March 7, 1995 on an order separation made in 2013.
Where is the evidence that I abandoned Susan for Judge Prus to award her the house? Transcript 1/8/2013: THE COURT: What he says here, my main reason is that I already divorced Susan February 17, 1993. That was a religious divorce. Ms. Serlin: It was a religious divorce in Israel without participation or knowledge of my client. THE COURT: Right.