The Daily Beast A new documentary, featuring sex advice gleaned from the Torah and
Kabbalah, turns out to be anti-gay, anti-women, and bizarrely
contradictory.
Audiences watching The Lost Key
will not likely be surprised to see a bearded, traditional Orthodox
rabbi telling them that missionary-style with a man on top, a woman on
the bottom, in near total darkness within the confines of marriage, is
the “right” way to have sex.
But they may be surprised when the rabbi claims that this position
will lead to a heightened, perhaps even holy, intimacy and that this and
other lessons from the Torah can “usher in a new era of sexual
relations,” as the press release (PDF) for The Lost Key boasts.
The documentary, which hits U.S. theaters on August 12, promises to
reveal to audiences “how a sexual relationship can go beyond mere
physical pleasure and become a spiritual experience where two become
One.”
Drawing from the Torah and Kabbalah, a form of Jewish mysticism, The Lost Key
sets out to prove that the lessons of traditional, Orthodox Judaism can
lead to better sex by showing couples how to create a heightened sense
of intimacy.
Oneness is the “highest form of physical intimacy,” director Ricardo Adler writes in his director’s statement.
Rabbi Manis Friedman, the author of Doesn’t Anyone Blush Anymore? Reclaiming Modesty, Intimacy, and Sexuality, serves as the leader on this journey to intimacy. [...]
The Lost Key bills itself as offering a “revolutionary way” for
couples to improve their sense of connection. It is cocksure in its
instructions, and it leaves little room for deviation. [...]
Why does Friedman think this style of relationship works above all
others? “We’re talking about 5,000 years of history,” he says.
He and The Lost Key never acknowledge that those 5,000 years
(longer, really) are filled with not only unhappy marriages, but
physical and sexually abused women, a subjugated LGBT population, and a
sexual culture of restriction and shame.
There is zero mention of same-sex relations at all in the entirety of The Lost Key, which is nothing short of shameful and absurd in 2015.
Not only is it factually lacking, it implies homosexual couples cannot achieve this highest intimacy. [...]
Whether it’s the existence of homosexuality or the value of sexual
pleasure, the failure to acknowledge certain aspects of human sexuality
detracts from The Lost Key and Rabbi Friedman’s messages.
That’s a shame because there are certainly some valuable insights contained in The Lost Key.
Perhaps the most compelling is the argument that our notion of romantic love is too flimsy to sustain a long-term relationship.[...]
I never thought I’d connect the words of Rabbi Freidman to Amy Schumer, but it just shows that The Lost Key does offer lessons that can be attractive and useful for those of us navigating the modern dating world.
They
are also lessons that can apply to many types of relationships: gay,
straight, open, ring or no ring. It’s a shame that so many of these
people are effectively turned away before they can glean this insight.[...]
Did you want them to condone same sex relationships?or are you disturbed that they did not emphasize that since it is a capital punishment aveira the impulse can be controlled??The ''non-ring''relationships,often involve issurei niddah.
ReplyDeleteI am really not sure what you meant with all that.
Is there anything wrong with being anti-gay??[not to kill them that is for bais din]Isn't the RBS"O himself anti gay??b'vakasha l'hasbir.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ibtimes.co.uk/rabbi-manis-friedman-compare-child-sex-abuse-430047
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/call-for-apology-as-rabbi-manis-friedman-likens-child-sex-abuse-to-diarrhoea/story-e6frg6nf-1226566273557
http://galusaustralis.com/2013/02/6779/manny-waks-converses-with-rabbi-manis-friedman/
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/call-for-apology-as-rabbi-manis-friedman-likens-child-sex-abuse-to-diarrhoea/story-e6frg6nf-1226566273557
http://www.jewishjournal.com/bloggish/item/rabbi_manis_friedman_who_downplayed_damage_caused_by_sexual_abuse_apologize
Friedman appears totally out of his depth on this subject matter and has been for some time by reading these links above. What Friedman fails to acknowledge in his "apology" is that many reported Jewish child molestation cases, particularly in Australia, took place by a male perpetrator against a male victim. Neither Friedman nor any of the enablers of the abuse in Australia, regard the homosexuality aspect of child abuse disturbing, yet his documentary appears to look down on couples in homosexual relationships between consenting adults.
The full text of Friedman’s apology is below:
I want to apologize for my completely inappropriate use of language when discussing sexual abuse. I have always believed in the importance of empowering victims of all kinds to move forward in building their lives. In my zeal to reinforce that belief, I came across as being dismissive of one of the worst crimes imaginable.
For that I am deeply sorry.
Molestation is a devastating crime, violating the intimacy and innocence of the pure and defenseless. The victim is left feeling that there is something wrong with the world in which they live. Perpetrators of molestation should be reported to the police and prosecuted appropriately. Any person, organization or entity that stands by silently is abetting in the crime.
From now on, I will make sure to make those points absolutely clear. This is about more than regret. The subject can't be neglected.
I hope over time to earn the forgiveness of those who were hurt by my words.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/rabbi-manis-friedman-compare-child-sex-abuse-430047
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/call-for-apology-as-rabbi-manis-friedman-likens-child-sex-abuse-to-diarrhoea/story-e6frg6nf-1226566273557
http://galusaustralis.com/2013/02/6779/manny-waks-converses-with-rabbi-manis-friedman/
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/call-for-apology-as-rabbi-manis-friedman-likens-child-sex-abuse-to-diarrhoea/story-e6frg6nf-1226566273557
http://www.jewishjournal.com/bloggish/item/rabbi_manis_friedman_who_downplayed_damage_caused_by_sexual_abuse_apologize
Friedman appears totally out of his depth on this subject matter and has been for some time by reading these links above. What Friedman fails to acknowledge in his "apology" is that many reported Jewish child molestation cases, particularly in Australia, took place by a male perpetrator against a male victim. Neither Friedman nor any of the enablers of the abuse in Australia, regard the homosexuality aspect of child abuse disturbing, yet his documentary appears to look down on couples in homosexual relationships between consenting adults.
The full text of Friedman’s apology is below:
I want to apologize for my completely inappropriate use of language when discussing sexual abuse. I have always believed in the importance of empowering victims of all kinds to move forward in building their lives. In my zeal to reinforce that belief, I came across as being dismissive of one of the worst crimes imaginable.
For that I am deeply sorry.
Molestation is a devastating crime, violating the intimacy and innocence of the pure and defenseless. The victim is left feeling that there is something wrong with the world in which they live. Perpetrators of molestation should be reported to the police and prosecuted appropriately. Any person, organization or entity that stands by silently is abetting in the crime.
From now on, I will make sure to make those points absolutely clear. This is about more than regret. The subject can't be neglected.
I hope over time to earn the forgiveness of those who were hurt by my words.
I was thinking the other day: The Gemara says that one should NOT say that he does not like pork. Rather one should say, I do want pork - but what can I do? Hashem has forbidden it.
ReplyDeleteSo how does this differ when it comes to our attitude regarding homosexuality? Why are we disgusted by it, homophobic, anti-gay? Why aren't we saying that we should be theoretically attracted to homosexuality and that we reject it for ourselves solely because Hashem says it is Ossur?
Homosexuality is Toeva to Hashem. This does not mean that we should view it that way. Or does it? And if so why?
@Yehuda - Rav Moshe Feinstein explicitly disagrees with your analysis.
ReplyDeleteThis is actually a very interesting discussion for several reasons.
ReplyDeletea) Not everyone desires pork, or shellfish, sometimes my family feel disgust even at the thought of these foods, and of course for mishkav zachar.
b) on the other hand , some do have a taavah for pork or shellfish, and also for homosexuality.
c) The Teshuva of Rav Moshe shows how radically times have changed. around 60-70 years ago , the act of homosexuality was a crime in the UK, and I presume also in other western countries. Today it is almost the opposite - it is "assur" in secular law to be mevazeh people of that persuasion. These are called "hate crimes", and they are comparable to racial hatred.
In R' Moshe's time, he was correct that even many sinners mock the homosexuality industry - but today everyone is "proud" of this, and even straight people support them.
So in this modern context, it can be argued that it is a widespread taavah, which has been given "legitimacy" by the secular world. Hence Yehuda's point may (or may not) have some validity.
Reb Yisroel Salanter Ztvk''l,in one of his writings differentiates between aveiros that intrinsically, had the Torah not prohibited them,there is nothing wrong with them.I.e.not eating pork.there Chazal said,one should not say I do not want to eat pork,but rather I want to but the Torah forbade it.However,aveiros that are manifestations of bad middos,i.e stealing,killing,loshan horah,regarding these the Chazl never said that one should desire to do them and the only thing preventing him from doing so is the tzivuy of theTorah.
ReplyDeleteInto which category mishkav zochor belongs can perhaps be debated,
but we have to remember the Torah called it TOAYVA.
This is a Rambam in shemona perakim
ReplyDeleteYou are right.However,if I remember correctly,I originally saw it some were in Reb Yisroel's writings,he may have been quoting the Ramba''m,so that is how it stuck in my memory.
ReplyDelete