The explanations provided Thursday by the State Prosecution regarding its decision to sign off on the "starving mother's" plea bargain didn't manage to convince many people in the legal system. In a conversation with Ynet, a senior prosecutor leveled scathing criticism on the process and pointed an accusatory figure on the softened approach taken by enforcement bodies towards women when there is fear of renewed haredi riots in the capital.
"This woman is fit to stand trial. However, despite this, it is clear that there is a certain disturbance here that makes it clear that if the court were to convict her, she would be sent to prison for a few months to a year," explained the senior prosecutor, who is unrelated to the case. [...]
This was a complete victory for the innocent mom and the Jewish community, as demonstrated here by the zionists hand wringing over her "getting away with it."
ReplyDeleteDon't understand your logic. She admitted guilt - despite all the stupid rioting and zionist conspiracy theories. She is guilty.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is that the court seemed intimidated by the thought of more rioting - even though this type of sentence is not out of line with what is done in other cases where there is no rioting.
In short - the riots were a disgusting chilul hashem motivated by a lie - which has not been revealed.
The chareidi world has lost a lot of credibility because of this. How can you claim this was a victory and that is innocent?!
Have you no compassion for her children and children of other chareidi parents who are abusive?
Innocent people (including in America) plead guilty all the time to avoid trial and possible false conviction.
ReplyDelete