Trump threatens to double Mexico tariffs if it does not stop migrants heading toward border

 https://www.jpost.com/international/article-914748

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum recognized that a group of people were walking northward toward the United States, but said that no migrant caravans have arrived at the US border since Trump returned to power last year.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday threatened to double tariffs on Mexico if it does not stop more than a thousand migrants walking north toward the United States after last week's US election, warning that they would not be allowed to enter.

"Here we go again!" Trump wrote on social media. "They will not be accepted! MEXICO MUST STOP THEM, NOW, and if they do not do so, the Tariffs on Mexico will be IMMEDIATELY DOUBLED. MEXICO, THE GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, THE VERY LIBERAL NEW GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, OUR GREAT BORDER PATROL, & ICE, HAVE BEEN SO INFORMED. There will be no leniency!"

Politics

 Shabbos (11a)  And Rava bar Meḥasseya said that Rav Ḥama bar Gurya said that Rav said: Even if all the seas would be ink, and the reeds that grow near swamps would be quills, and the heavens would be parchment upon which the words would be written, and all the people would be scribes; all of these are insufficient to write the unquantifiable space of governmental authority, i.e., all the considerations with which a government must concern itself and deal. Rav Mesharshiya said: What is the verse that alludes to this? “The Heavens on High and the land to the depth and the heart of kings are unsearchable” (Proverbs 25:3). 

Servitude

Shabbos (11a)  And Rava bar Meḥasseya said that Rav Ḥama bar Gurya said that Rav said: It is preferable to be under the yoke of Ishmael and not under the yoke of a stranger, the Romans; under a stranger and not under a Ḥabar, a Persian Zoroastrian fire priest; under a Ḥabar and not under a Torah scholar, as if one offends a Torah scholar who is greater than he, the scholar will be exacting with him and he will be punished at the hand of Heaven; under a Torah scholar and not under an orphan or a widow, as they are easily insulted and God promised to hear their cries and punish those who offend them. 

Soldier reprimands Hegseth and advisers at Tomb of the Unknown Soldier

The man standing in the way of a government with the haredim isn't even in the Knesset

 https://www.israelhayom.com/2026/11/11/the-man-standing-in-the-way-of-a-government-with-the-haredim-isnt-even-in-the-knesset/

The ultra-Orthodox parties are gazing at Lieberman's oasis and wondering: Can it be? Is the most ruthless politician of them all really offering us everything we want? They would welcome a unity government, but their efforts are focused in the wrong direction, and an unexpected figure could yet dash their hopes.

The ultra-Orthodox political operatives want power. As in Likud, the higher up the party hierarchy you go, the less affection there is for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The rank and file, however, would find it hard to stomach a prolonged partnership with a Reform rabbi, Yair Golan, Bennett and the center-left in general.

The Madness of Therapy Culture

 https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-madness-of-therapy-culture/

Somewhere along the way, the boundaries between mental health and mental illness had become blurred until the former meant the latter. 

Well, not everyone. Even as we are all being told we belong somewhere on the “mental health” spectrum, the World Health Organization is calling for an end to “coercive practices in mental health.” The UN Disability Committee is urging states to pursue “the abolition of substitute decision-making regimes” in favor of “supported” alternatives for those we once called “mentally ill,” but who are now variously “people with mental health conditions” or “psychosocial disabilities.” These are people whose suffering often expressly means they are unable to make decisions for themselves. The rest of us are presumed fragile, but the psychotic is increasingly presumed sovereign. As deBoer writes, it has become “our transcendent obligation to pretend that a man in the grip of psychosis [is] somehow still free.”

DeBoer and Liu both show that attempts to flatten out the experience of suffering, disability, and mental illness fail to accomplish their purported aims, such as “destigmatizing” and expanding access to care. This is because reality, whether in the form of the severity of impairment or of social class, eventually asserts itself, with the consequences falling on those least able to bear them. 

Contradicting Trump, Netanyahu’s office says Israel will ‘gradually’ move off US military aid

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/contradicting-trump-netanyahus-office-says-israel-will-gradually-move-off-us-military-aid/

In his second statement on the issue since US President Donald Trump said that American military aid to Israel would end this year, caretaker Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office on Wednesday said Jerusalem will “phase out” assistance from Washington.

“In 1996, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel would gradually phase out American economic assistance, which stood at $1.2 billion,” said his office. “He followed through on that commitment.”

“Thirty years later, Prime Minister Netanyahu said that Israel’s economy is strong enough to gradually phase out American military assistance as well,” the premier’s office continued.

House Republicans Block Hegseth Impeachment, but Democrats Could Revive Effort in January

 https://time.com/article/2026/11/10/hegseth-impeachment-procedural-vote-house/

The House voted 211-204 to defeat a resolution brought by Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a Republican who has repeatedly clashed with Trump, preventing lawmakers from considering eight articles of impeachment accusing Hegseth of violating the Constitution, conducting unauthorized military operations, and abusing the powers of his office.

With a Democratic majority in the House, impeachment articles would stand a substantially greater chance of passage. Unlike a Senate conviction, which requires support of a two-thirds majority, impeachment in the House requires only a simple majority. Democrats could therefore approve articles without Republican support if enough of their members backed the effort.

Such a vote would make Hegseth only the third Cabinet secretary in American history to be impeached, following William Belknap, President Ulysses S. Grant's secretary of war, in 1876, and Alejandro Mayorkas, President Joe Biden's homeland security secretary, in 2024. It would also raise the prospect of a Senate trial soon after Democrats take control of the chamber,  forcing lawmakers in both parties to confront allegations of unlawful military conduct at a time when the Iran war has become a major political liability for the White House.

How Canada Inflicted Maximum Midterms Pain on Trump

 https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/11/08/trade-war-midterm-elections-canada-carney-01154193?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

Ottawa spent a decade trying to appease, match and outlast Trump. This year, it read the electoral map.

If any state was primed for a fight over tariffs, it was Michigan, home to one of the country’s most fiercely contested Senate races. In the summer of 2025, two entrepreneurial political consultants — one Democrat, one Republican — had joined forces to create the Michigan Trade Smart Alliance with the hopes of drafting the state’s top business groups. At the time, corporate leaders nationwide were wary of publicly challenging Trump’s policy out of a fear that they would draw his wrath. But as trade negotiators from the two countries remained deadlocked over an end to the trade war, the association’s membership began to balloon.

“The linkage between cost of living for Americans and tariffs on the world, and specifically on Canada, broke through,” Kirsten Hillman, who served as Canada’s ambassador to Washington from 2019 to early 2026, said two days after the election. “And that is something that we have been trying as a country, not just the government, but Canadian businesses, to really get into the U.S. discourse for two years.”

Learning Gemara in English: The Steinsaltz Talmud Translation

 https://traditiononline.org/learning-gemara-in-english-the-steinsaltz-talmud-translation/

A careful examination of many sections of the volume leads this reviewer to the unavoidable conclusion that the beauty of the Steinsaltz Talmud is skin-deep. Where a straightforward translation is required, an excellent job is done. However, once it ventures into the deeper waters of clarifying the subtleties of Talmudic discourse and of its commentators, it runs out of strength and begins to flounder.

Specifically, the work is marred by an extraordinary number of inaccuracies stemming primarily from misreadings of the sources; it fails to explain those diffcult passages which the reader would expect it to explain; and it confuses him with notes which are often irrelevant, incomprehensible and contradictory. The major criticism so far registered against the Steinsaltz English Talmud has been that of Leon Wieseltier in The New York Times Book Review: it fails to transmit the true flavor of "learning" Gemara. This can be explained only by the fact that few if any of the reviewers to date have attempted to probe beneath the external aspects of the translation-the merit of translating the Talmud, the format and the graphics. They have not dealt with the actual "learning" of the Talmudic text, and it is in this cardinal aspect that this work is deficient. Furthermore, since two-thirds of the deficiencies cited in this article are to be found in the original Steinsaltz Talmud, i those dedicated to the integrity of the Talmudic process might well want to reexamine the Hebrew Steinsaltz with an eye towards its scholarly usefulness for the serious student.

Response of Steinsaltz

https://traditiononline.org/communications-67/

In "a careful examination of many sections" of "The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition," Rabbi Aharon Feldman (Tradition, 25:4, Summer 1991) calls the work "bold in its conception and ambitious in its scope"; "it meets well the formidable challenge" of translating and explaining theTalmud in a manner that is "highly readable, clear and most important, patient with the beginning student"; it is, moreover, a work in which "a great amount of resources, effort and publicity, as well as good writing," have been invested.However, having said this, Rabbi Feldman spends the rest of his reviewdetailing a total of fourteen passages to which he objects. Of these objections, two are well taken, one can charitably be explained as a lack of clarity on our part, one is an accreditation error, one is an instance where reasonable people may disagree, and nine are totally unfounded.

‘Israelis don’t understand how bad things are for Israel in the US’

 https://www.ynetnews.com/jewish-world/article/ry00mepergl

For decades, American Jews largely saw no contradiction between their Jewish identity and their place in the United States. Today, however, growing political polarization, changing attitudes toward Israel and rising antisemitism are making that relationship increasingly complicated.

Dr. Yehuda Kurtzer, co-president of the Shalom Hartman Institute, has lived in New York for the past 17 years with his wife, Stephanie Ives, and their three children. He says American Jewish identity developed differently from that of Jewish communities elsewhere in the Diaspora because Jews in the United States built an identity that did not force them to choose between being Jewish and being American.

“Over the past 100 years, American Jews built this identity around liberal democratic values,” Kurtzer told ynet. “That enabled us to integrate into American society and not be Jewish only at home, but also in the public sphere. Jews are partners in every area of American life. We developed a very strong Jewish identity that says I can be Jewish and also fully part of American society.”

For decades, support for Israel was broadly bipartisan. Kurtzer argues that this has changed dramatically as Israel has become part of the wider polarization dividing American politics, leaving Jewish Americans caught between parties that increasingly use Israel and antisemitism as weapons against one another.

Trump’s ‘Status Quo’ With Iran Is an Admission of Defeat

 https://www.newsweek.com/trump-iran-status-quo-admission-defeat-12694638

Donald Trump said America was "keeping it the status quo" with Iran and declared the war with Tehran was "militarily, effectively over" in comments to the press on Monday.

If, by status quo, the president means the circumstances of the past few months, then he’d be referring to a Strait of Hormuz that remains heavily restricted, intermittent attacks on oil tankers, the indefinite presence of American aircraft carriers and warships in the Middle East, and a naval

America’s war aims in Iran have never exactly been crystal clear, but, by almost any measure, the status quo looks suspiciously like failure. If you could go back to February and tell U.S. lawmakers—or indeed any American—that this is where we’d be after eight months, would anyone have considered it a price worth paying?

Netanyahu: Israel will soon face pressure to accept nuclear Iran, must form unity gov't

 https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-914488

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in his address to the Knesset on Tuesday that Iran is working to renew its nuclear threat, and that "the only way to permanently remove this existential threat is through the downfall of the Ayatollah regime."

Netanyahu also warned that Israel will imminently face international pressure to accept Iran as a nuclear power and "to tolerate the terrifying regime seeking its destruction."

He also added that Israel can be expected to be pressured to "retreat from its monumental achievements and from the major progress made regarding security zones."

Deborah Lipstadt: Is Israel really the cause of surging antisemitism?

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/deborah-lipstadt-is-israel-really-the-cause-of-surging-antisemitism/

In a no-holds-barred conversation, Lipstadt assesses the nature of contemporary Jew-hatred and weighs in on whether Israel’s actions indeed may be contributing to its rise.

We hear her thoughts on whether “anti-Zionism” is a new form of antisemitism or its own distinct hatred and what the proverbial Venn diagram looks like.

But to start with, we return to 1967, when university student Lipstadt was here in Jerusalem during the Six Day War and hear her firsthand account of life in the newly unified capital.