Oylem Goylem wrote: Could Rav Eidensohn possibly give R. Hoffman's audio it's own post?
After the op-ed he wrote for VIN, here is the audio of R. Yair Hoffman speaking on the Martin Grossman saga on the Dov Hikind show.
He's makdim with showering praise on attorney Zweibel and the Moetzes, that he agrees with them on everything except this. A smart move since he would be blacklisted otherwise or worse.
He cites the Noda Bihudah that murderers must be killed otherwise murders will become a hefkerus.
He says that rabbonim were misled with biased information from Grossman's lawyers overstating the case in favor of their client.
He argues there are so many other causes of pikuach nefesh we should get together to fight for first before Grossman - causes that are 100% justified and not "ekeldik" where someone beat a woman to death and burned her body.
This case created tremendous aivah since:
A. Goyim see frum Jews advocate for the death penalty except when it is one of their own
B. Killing of women and police officers generates a lot of moral outrage among the public
R. Hoffman mentioned how numerous meshugoyim had attacked and harassed not only Gov. Crist but also the family of the murdered officer.
At this point, Dov Hikind's behavior was more than I could stomach. He vociferously protested that there are no such thing as meshugoyim in the frum community, (pandering for obvious reasons) especially not among his radio show audience. He got his assistant Charnie to chime in seconding his motion. Why won't many be surprised what a politician does here for votes and ad dollars?
Dr. Katz from the 5 Towns speaks up at this point saying that there has never been a jury who acquitted someone purposely murdering a woman police officer and opines that trying to save Grossman's life goes against dina demalchusa.
We get some comic relief with Dov Hikind mistakenly referring to Shafran as "Dr." Avi Shafran.
After the op-ed he wrote for VIN, here is the audio of R. Yair Hoffman speaking on the Martin Grossman saga on the Dov Hikind show.
He's makdim with showering praise on attorney Zweibel and the Moetzes, that he agrees with them on everything except this. A smart move since he would be blacklisted otherwise or worse.
He cites the Noda Bihudah that murderers must be killed otherwise murders will become a hefkerus.
He says that rabbonim were misled with biased information from Grossman's lawyers overstating the case in favor of their client.
He argues there are so many other causes of pikuach nefesh we should get together to fight for first before Grossman - causes that are 100% justified and not "ekeldik" where someone beat a woman to death and burned her body.
This case created tremendous aivah since:
A. Goyim see frum Jews advocate for the death penalty except when it is one of their own
B. Killing of women and police officers generates a lot of moral outrage among the public
R. Hoffman mentioned how numerous meshugoyim had attacked and harassed not only Gov. Crist but also the family of the murdered officer.
At this point, Dov Hikind's behavior was more than I could stomach. He vociferously protested that there are no such thing as meshugoyim in the frum community, (pandering for obvious reasons) especially not among his radio show audience. He got his assistant Charnie to chime in seconding his motion. Why won't many be surprised what a politician does here for votes and ad dollars?
Dr. Katz from the 5 Towns speaks up at this point saying that there has never been a jury who acquitted someone purposely murdering a woman police officer and opines that trying to save Grossman's life goes against dina demalchusa.
We get some comic relief with Dov Hikind mistakenly referring to Shafran as "Dr." Avi Shafran.