Lack of activity due to recovery from major stroke.
Please daven for the refuah shelima of:
Daniel Reuven ben Esther
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
Friday, March 31, 2017
Allegations that Nunes lies about his sources in an attempt to defend Trump against congressional investigation he is conducting
A pair of White House officials helped provide Representative Devin
Nunes of California, a Republican and the chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee, with the intelligence reports that showed that
President Trump and his associates were incidentally swept up in foreign
surveillance by American spy agencies.
The
revelation on Thursday that White House officials disclosed the
reports, which Mr. Nunes then discussed with Mr. Trump, is likely to
fuel criticism that the intelligence chairman has been too eager to do the bidding
of the Trump administration while his committee is supposed to be
conducting an independent investigation of Russia’s meddling in the
presidential election.
It
is the latest twist of a bizarre Washington drama that began after dark
on March 21, when Mr. Nunes got a call from a person he has described
only as a source. The call came as he was riding across town in an Uber
car, and he quickly diverted to the White House. The next day, Mr. Nunes
gave a hastily arranged news conference before going to brief Mr. Trump on what he had learned the night before from — as it turns out — White House officials.
The
chain of events — and who helped provide the intelligence to Mr. Nunes —
was detailed to The New York Times by four American officials.
Since
disclosing the existence of the intelligence reports, Mr. Nunes has
refused to identify his sources, saying he needed to protect them so
others would feel safe going to the committee with sensitive
information. In his public comments, he has described his sources as
whistle-blowers trying to expose wrongdoing at great risk to themselves.
That
does not appear to be the case. Several current American officials
identified the White House officials as Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior
director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael
Ellis, a lawyer who works on national security issues at the White House
Counsel’s Office and was previously counsel to Mr. Nunes’s committee.
Though neither has been accused of breaking any laws, they do appear to
have sought to use intelligence to advance the political goals of the
Trump administration.
Sean
Spicer, the White House spokesman, refused to confirm or deny at his
daily briefing that Mr. Ellis and Mr. Cohen-Watnick were Mr. Nunes’s
sources. The administration’s concern was the substance of the
intelligence reports, not how they ended up in Mr. Nunes’s hands, Mr.
Spicer said.
The “obsession with who talked to whom, and when, is not the answer,” Mr. Spicer said. “It should be the substance.”
Jack
Langer, a spokesman for Mr. Nunes, said in a statement, “As he’s stated
many times, Chairman Nunes will not confirm or deny speculation about
his source’s identity, and he will not respond to speculation from
anonymous sources.”
Mr.
Cohen-Watnick, 30, is a former Defense Intelligence Agency official who
served on the Trump transition team and was originally brought to the
White House by Michael T. Flynn, the former national security adviser.
He
was nearly pushed out of his job this month by Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster,
who replaced Mr. Flynn as national security adviser, but survived after
the intervention of Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, and
Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist.
The officials who detailed the newly disclosed White House role said that this month, shortly after Mr. Trump claimed on Twitter
that he was wiretapped during the campaign on the orders of President
Barack Obama, Mr. Cohen-Watnick began reviewing highly classified
reports detailing the intercepted communications of foreign officials.
There
were conflicting accounts of what prompted Mr. Cohen-Watnick to dig
into the intelligence. One official with direct knowledge of the events
said Mr. Cohen-Watnick began combing through intelligence reports this
month in an effort to find evidence that would justify Mr. Trump’s
Twitter posts about wiretapping.
But
another person who was briefed on the events said Mr. Cohen-Watnick
came upon the information as he was reviewing how widely intelligence
reports on intercepts were shared within the American spy agencies. He
then alerted the N.S.C. general counsel, but the official said Mr.
Cohen-Watnick was not the person who showed the reports to Mr. Nunes.
That person and a third official said it was then Mr. Ellis who allowed Mr. Nunes to view the material. [...]
The High Price of Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Life
On Thursdays, the nonprofit organization Footsteps hosts a drop-in group for its membership of formerly ultra-Orthodox Jews, who mostly refer to themselves as “off the derech.”
“Derech” means “path” in Hebrew, and “off the derech,” or O.T.D. for
short, is how their ultra-Orthodox families and friends refer to them
when they break away from these tight-knit, impermeable communities, as
in: “Did you hear that Shaindel’s daughter Rivkie is off the derech? I
heard she has a smartphone and has been going to museums.” So even
though the term is burdened with the yoke of the very thing they are
trying to flee, members remain huddled together under “O.T.D.” on their
blogs and in their Facebook groups, where their favored hashtag is
#itgetsbesser — besser meaning “better” in Yiddish. Sometimes
someone will pop up on a message board or in an email group and say,
“Shouldn’t we decide to call ourselves something else?” But it never
takes. Reclamations are messy.
At
the drop-in session I attended, 10 men and women in their 20s and 30s
sat around a coffee table. Some of them were dressed like me, in jeans
and American casualwear, and others wore the clothing of their
upbringings: long skirts and high-collared shirts for women; black
velvet skullcaps and long, virgin beards and payot (untrimmed
side locks) for men. Half of them had extricated themselves from their
communities and were navigating new, secular lives. But half still lived
among their Hasidic and ultra-Orthodox sects in areas of New York City,
New Jersey and the Hudson Valley and were secretly dipping their toes
into the secular world — attending these meetings, but also doing things
as simple as walking down the street without head coverings, or trying
on pants in a clothing store, or eating a nonkosher doughnut, or using
the internet. They had families at home who believed they were in
evening Torah learning sessions, or out for a walk, or at synagogue for
evening prayers. On the coffee table were two pizzas, one kosher, one
nonkosher. The kosher pizza tasted better, but only a couple of people
ate it.
The
group was facilitated by a Footsteps social worker, Jesse Pietroniro,
soft-spoken and kind, who had told me that he had his own conflicted
religious upbringing. He allowed the attendees to democratically settle
on a loose theme for the evening. One woman in her early 20s brought up
sexuality. She had started to date and wasn’t quite sure what the norms
were. A young man talked about how hard it was for him to interact with
women casually outside his community, since he was taught that sexual
desire outside the intent to procreate means that one is a sexual
predator, so anytime he was attracted to someone, he worried he was
going to do something untoward, or that he was a kind of monster. The
young woman who had suggested the theme said she didn’t know when
exactly to submit to kissing — the first date? The second? Is she a slut
if she kisses at all? Is it still bad nowadays to be a slut? She’d
heard girls talking on the subway and calling each other sluts, and they
were laughing. Are there rules for this? A few of them made sex jokes.
The O.T.D.ers, newly alive in a world of puns and innuendo, love a
junior-high-grade sex joke. The social worker narrowed his eyes and
pursed his lips and tapped a finger to his chin and nodded and opened
the question up to the group. (I was allowed to document the meeting on
the condition that I wouldn’t publish anyone’s name or descriptive
information.)
Another
woman in her early 20s, sitting on the sofa in jeans with one leg slung
over its arm, told us she had spent most of her life being molested by
her father. She told the group that recently she had taken to
advertising online, saying she followed the laws of family purity —
going to a ritual bath after menstruation, not having sex during her
“unclean” week — and that she was available for sex in exchange for
money. Ultra-Orthodox men visited her at all hours, and they cheated on
their wives, having sex with this ritually pure young woman in her
apartment. When the men finished, they told her what a shame it was that
she was off the derech, that she seemed nice, that she should try again
at a religious life.
A
man, 30ish, still with a beard that he now trimmed closely to his face,
talked about staying with his religious wife, who knew he was no longer
religious but wouldn’t join him on the other side. He knew the marriage
should be over, but he wouldn’t leave, and he couldn’t bring himself to
cheat on her, and he wanted to know if he was unable to cheat on her
because he was bound up by his religious values or because he was
innately a good person. Another married man said that you don’t need to
be taught in a religious context not to cheat on your wife — it’s a
tenet of secular marriage as well, and what the whole operation often
depends on.
“I
guess I just don’t know if I’m a good person because I’m a good
person,” said the guy who wanted to cheat but might not, “or if I’m a
good person because I was taught to be a good person.”
They
went around in circles for many minutes, most of them summoning
scriptural sources on whether morality is inherent, then other sources
to make or disprove that point, then laughing at the fact that they’d
summoned Scripture. The married man who was deciding if he should have
sex outside his marriage put his head in his hands, then through his
hair and made a great, guttural noise of frustration.[...]
Footsteps was started
in 2003 by a college student named Malkie Schwartz, who grew up in the
Lubavitch sect in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, and who knew after high
school that she wanted to step off the community’s moving walkway to
marriage and motherhood. She moved in with a grandmother who wasn’t
religious and enrolled at Hunter College on the Upper East Side.
But
just because she left her community didn’t mean that she felt part of
the secular one. She started Footsteps as a drop-in group right there at
Hunter and told a couple of formerly religious friends what she was
doing. About 20 people showed up to the first meeting. Soon they had a
G.E.D. study group — and a human-sexuality-and-relationships group, so
that they could learn about sex education, which was normally taught to
the ultra-Orthodox only in the days leading up to their weddings.
Footsteps became a chrysalis for them through which they would leap into
their new lives, just as soon as they figured out exactly how to live
them.
Schwartz
eventually left the organization in the hands of nonprofit
professionals — Footsteps was a chrysalis for her, too — and went to law
school. Today, Footsteps is a 501(c)(3) with an executive director,
social workers, scholarships, court-companion programs and special
events like fashion nights, at which members learn about modern style
outside the realm of black-and-white dresses and suits and hats.
Ultra-Orthodox communities, whose leaders stand vigil against outside
influences, know about Footsteps; about half the people I met in
Footsteps first heard of it when they were accused by someone in their
family of being a member.
It’s
hard to talk about O.T.D.ers as a group, because like the rest of us,
like ultra-Orthodox people, too, they are individuals. No two people who
practice religion do it exactly the same way, despite how much it seems
to the secular world that they rally around sameness; and no one who
leaves it leaves the same way, either. In the region of New York City,
New Jersey, and the Hudson Valley that Footsteps serves, 546,000
ultra-Orthodox Jews live in one of about five different sects. With a
few exceptions, like the Skver sect in New Square, N.Y., which has
actual boundaries and operates its own schools, the ultra-Orthodox live
not in cloistered neighborhoods, but among secular America in Crown
Heights, Flatbush and Williamsburg, Brooklyn, and beyond. Perhaps it’s
easiest to think of them as living in a different dimension — occupying
the same space but speaking a different language (Yiddish, for the most
part), attending different schools, seeing their own doctors, handling
judicial issues among themselves and eating their own food from their
own markets.
So
once they leave, if they leave, they learn how ill equipped they are
for survival outside their home neighborhoods, and that has a lot to do
with the ways that ultra-Orthodox communities are valuable and good: the
daily cycle of prayer and school and learning; how people share goals
about family and values; how neighbors support one another during times
of need. Once that’s gone, and all a person has is her mostly
Judaic-studies education and little familial support and no real skills,
life gets scary. For those who leave and are married with children, the
community tends to embrace the spouse left behind and help raise funds
for legal support to help that person retain custody of the children.
You could be someone with a spouse and children one day and find
yourself completely alone the next.
I
learned about Footsteps in 2015, after the very public suicide of one
of its young members. Her name was Faigy Mayer, and on a hot night in
July, she went to the top of 230 Fifth Avenue in the Flatiron district,
where there’s a rooftop bar, and jumped. In death, she became something
of a brief symbol (and also a lightning rod) for the O.T.D. movement,
with her story plastered across local papers, many illustrated by a
Facebook image of her holding a paintbrush and standing in front of a
newly painted mural that said “Life is Beautiful.”[...]
Feeling sad is ‘new normal’ in Trump’s America, therapists say
Jewish mental health professionals like Rubenstein say they have seen an
unprecedented increase in stress, sadness and other negative feelings
that clients are directly tying to the election and its aftermath.
Their testimonies speak to a larger trend: A
January study by the American Psychological Association found that more
than half of all Americans cited the political climate as a very or
somewhat significant source of stress.
Elections usually lead to discontent from the
losing side, but not anxiety and depression, said Sam Menahem, a
psychologist based in Fort Lee, New Jersey.
“Every election people might talk about it a
little bit, they don’t like the candidate that won, but it doesn’t make
them more anxious or depressed,” said Menahem, who has been practicing
psychology for 44 years. “They didn’t get their way, whether it’s a
Republican or a Democrat, but I’ve never seen anything like this —
never.”
He estimated that 60% of his patients were “experiencing exacerbation or worsening of symptoms after the election.”
Indeed, the APA survey found that the average
stress level saw its first “statistically significant increase” since it
was first conducted a decade ago: from 4.8 to 5.1 on a 1-10 scale in
the period of August 2016-January 2017.
Much of the anxiety can be traced to the
surprise victory of an unusually polarizing candidate over the apparent
front-runner and more conventional politician, Hillary Clinton. Jewish
voters supported Clinton over Trump by a margin of 3-1. Consequently,
they are overrepresented among people disappointed by Trump’s victory.
As to the degree of that disappointment,
mental health professionals and patients point to all the things that
make Trump unconventional: his impulsive tweets, his thin skin, his
embrace of various conspiracy theories, his lack of political experience
and the apparent chaos surrounding his inner circle in his first months
in office, to name a few.[...]
Political polarization has spilled into
people’s personal lives, threatening to tear apart close relationships,
said Nancy Kislin, a social worker in Chatham, New Jersey.
Kislin said that she had clients who had ended romantic relationships based on disagreements over Trump.
“I’ve never seen this before,” said Kislin,
noting that she had worked in private practice for 13 years, during the
presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
Seth Grobman, a clinical psychologist in
Davie, Florida, said patients have ended relationships with family
members and friends due to post-election political disagreements. To be
sure, political polarization isn’t the only factor in play, he said,
noting that widespread social media use was also to blame.[...]
Thursday, March 30, 2017
IDF threatens to punish soldiers who protest co-ed combat units
Arutz 7
The IDF is taking a surprisingly strident, and even threatening, tone against soldiers who, on their off-time, protest the army's increasing integration of women in combat units.
Hesder yeshiva soldiers have begun distributing literature explaining the dangers of mixed-gender combat units, and of women in combat roles altogether.
The Hesder soldiers are generally considered the army's best, and their campaign has taken off over just the past few days.
"In the face of all logic," the distributed pamphlets state, "and "ignoring expert opinions and research, the IDF is undergoing a transformation that harms its female soldiers, impairs its combat abilities, and detracts from the safety of all of us. It is not logical, it is not moral, it is not humane."
The name of the new campaign: "Saving the IDF."
The IDF, which has now set as one of its primary objectives the full integration of women throughout the military, responded harshly. The IDF Spokesman's Office even compared the new campaign with that of the extremist haredi group that says one must be killed rather than register for the draft: "The call to 'Save the IDF' is similar to the calls coming from the extremists in the haredi community that oppose enlistment in the IDF and the fulfillment of the laws of the country."
That is, the IDF Spokesman's Office compares the mass protests and campaign to oppose at all costs even registering with the IDF, on the one hand, to those who seek to warn, from within, against dangers in the IDF, and advocate a short delay, at most, in enlisting in the IDF.
The Spokesman's statement continues: "The IDF views with gravity, and condemns any attempt at any form of refusal. Calls for division with the IDF and insults to the honor of people must be opposed and uprooted. Everything must be done to continue to defend the State of Israel by all those who serve, from all sectors of Israeli society. Participation in this act is forbidden to IDF soldiers, and the subject will be intensively investigated and treated with severity."
The campaign against mixed combat units also cites the physiological differences between men and women, and the consequent differences in the way in which they are trained. While men must run with two canteens and five bullet cartridges in order to qualify as a combat soldier, females need run with only one canteen and two bullet cartridges to qualify for the same.
In addition, men must jump and climb over a wall, while women are permitted to stand on a bench in order to qualify for the wall-climbing test.
Former IDF Generals Yiftach Ron-Tal and Avigdor Kahalani are quoted in opposing the IDF's new gender-integration policies.
Monday, March 27, 2017
רשת השתקה למעשים חמורים במגזר: 22 חשודים חרדים נעצרו
. המשטרה פשטה על בתיהם של 22 חרדים החשודים בעבירות חמורות בירושלים, בית שמש, ביתר ובני ברק לאחר חקירה סמויה וממושכת בה נחשפה רשת שעל פי החשד סייעה להשתקה ומסמוס תלונות על מעשים קשים
עם סיומה של חקירה סמויה יצא לפועל הבוקר (שני) מבצע מעצרים וחיפוש ממוקד
במהלכו נעצרו 22 תושבי ירושלים, בית שמש, בית"ר עלית ובני ברק בחשד לביצוע
עבירות חמורות בילדים ובנשים שלא דווחו למשטרה ולרשויות הרווחה.
הבוקר, עם סיום איסוף הממצאים וכשבידי השוטרים צווי מעצר וחיפוש שהוצאו ע"י בית המשפט כנגד 22 חשודים, פשטה המשטרה על בתיהם, ביצעה חיפוש ועצרה אותם. כלל החשודים הובאו לחקירה ביחידה המרכזית של המשטרה ונחקרים בגין חשד לביצוע עבירות חמורות בילדים, נערים צעירים ונשים במהלך השנתיים האחרונות.
הבוקר, עם סיום איסוף הממצאים וכשבידי השוטרים צווי מעצר וחיפוש שהוצאו ע"י בית המשפט כנגד 22 חשודים, פשטה המשטרה על בתיהם, ביצעה חיפוש ועצרה אותם. כלל החשודים הובאו לחקירה ביחידה המרכזית של המשטרה ונחקרים בגין חשד לביצוע עבירות חמורות בילדים, נערים צעירים ונשים במהלך השנתיים האחרונות.
ראשיתה של החקירה באיסוף מידע ממוקד שהצביע על פעילות שביצעו גורמים במגזר
החרדי שפעלו למען 'טוהר המגזר'. הגורמים הללו פעלו, על פי החשד, באישור
ובהסכמת מנהיגי הפלגים והזרמים השונים במגזר, קיבלו ואספו מידע אודות אנשים
שתקפו ועשו מעשים חמורים, וניהלו נגדם הליך פנימי שבסופו קבעו והחליטו מה
יהיה על החשודים לעשות על מנת שהאירוע ייסגר ולא יועבר לטיפול המשטרה. ברוב
הפעמים הורו לחשודים לקבל טיפול כזה או אחר אצל גורמים בקהילה,
כל זאת ניהלו תוך רישום האירועים ופרטי המעורבים בעשרות פנקסים שנתפסו ע"י המשטרה.
בשיטה זו נהגו, עפ"י החשד, כלפי עשרות אנשים שתקפו אחרים, חלקם במספר הזדמנויות ובמספר רב של קורבנות, בהם ילדים וקטינים - כל זאת מבלי שהועבר דיווח לגורמי רווחה ולמשטרה.
כל זאת ניהלו תוך רישום האירועים ופרטי המעורבים בעשרות פנקסים שנתפסו ע"י המשטרה.
בשיטה זו נהגו, עפ"י החשד, כלפי עשרות אנשים שתקפו אחרים, חלקם במספר הזדמנויות ובמספר רב של קורבנות, בהם ילדים וקטינים - כל זאת מבלי שהועבר דיווח לגורמי רווחה ולמשטרה.
כאמור החל משעות הבוקר המוקדמות עצרה המשטרה 22 חשודים בגילאי 20-60 שלכל
אחד מהם מיוחסות פגיעות ועבירות חמורות באירועים שונים במהלך השנתיים
האחרונות. עם כניסת הכוחות לביצוע המעצרים בירושלים החלה התגודדות של חרדים
סביבם, כשחלקם ניסו לשבש את ביצוע המעצרים - יודו לעברם אבנים, הושלכו
חפצים וקראו לעברם בקריאות גנאי. שני חלונות של ניידות נופצו מאבנים שיודו
במקום. כאמור, כלל החשודים נחקרים במשטרה בסיומה יובאו מי מהם בפני בית
המשפט לדיון בעניינם.
[...]
22 CHAREDIM ARRESTED FOR SEXUAL ABUSE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN
In a raid conducted by Israeli Police forces early Monday morning, 22 Charedim were arrested on suspicion of sexual crimes against women and children over the past two years. The suspects had undergone internal proceedings conducted by a Charedi organization called “Tohar Hamachane” (also known as the Tznius police), who ‘treat’ the offenders but do not alert the police or child protective services.
The police raided the 22 Charedi residents of Jerusalem, Bnei Brak, and Beitar Illit with a search and arrest warrant based on an investigation. The investigation was launched after the police seized notebooks from Tohar Hamachane which included lists of victims and their crimes. Tohar Hamachane is a central body which works together with various faction leaders of the communities.
The suspects were arrested on suspicions of sexual offenses against women, minors and small children. The victims received no treatment by the Charedi authorities, according to police investigators.
During the arrest, surrounding Charedim mobilized in attempt to disrupt the police, shouting slurs and hurling stones and objects, which broke two windows of the police vehicles.
The suspects were not subjected to any punishment by the internal Charedi authorities, instead being allowed psychological and psychiatric treatment towards rehabilitation. The Charedi faction leaders submit offenders in their congregations to the Charedi authorities in exchange for said authorities agreeing not to report the crimes to the police.
“This exposure will first and foremost stop these offenders from abusing any further victims,” said the police in a statement. “At the same time, the police are working to make the suspects stand trial in court and mete justice upon them for any crimes to which they are connected.”
According to an army radio report, there are over 100 known victims and some of the suspects have already confessed to the police.
The sect that wasn’t:The false claims of Satanic Abuse in Sanhedria Murchevet
After more than two years of in-depth investigation, the police has
reached a conclusion that the rumors regarding the existence of a sect,
the members of which torture children and make them convert to
Christianity, are nothing but baseless rumors.
Today “Chadrei Charedim” is revealing the workings of the criminal group. In order to understand it better, let us go back in time to August 2011, when the biggest ever case of attacks recorded in Israel was revealed to the public. The prosecution pressed charges against three suspects, who were indicted for attacking dozens of children aged 3-12 and extorting money from them in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Nachlaot.
The tension in the neighborhood was not alleviated after the enquiry and the indictment. The residents claimed that the police is disqualifying testimonies and releasing suspects, and that there are still dangerous people roaming the neighborhood and harming the children.
Stories were told of one of the neighborhood residents, who was 72 at the time, claiming the existence of a basement filled with missionary literature. The elderly woman was attacked and severely harmed”.
This case stirred Jerusalem in general and the Charedi community in particular, and thus it served as a fertile ground for extorting money. According to the police, that is when D. began her activity on a large scale, persuading many Sanhedria residents that there is an active Christian sect operating in the neighborhood, serving large Christian organizations, whose goal is to convert the children, to kidnap them to monasteries and to torture them.
We received information regarding a known Charedi Talmud Torah receiving an offer from the suspect, claiming that since there are dangerous people operating in the neighborhood, she would be prepared to donate a limited number of security cameras to be installed in the cheder, for “catching the suspects”. The administration of the cheder was persuaded and allowed for the security cameras to be installed. However, this caused an utter panic among the parents, who demanded that the director of the cheder invests more in providing security for the children. The administration gave in to the pressure and purchased dozens of additional cameras- However, suspicious people never showed up in the camera recordings.
It appears that while the parents were panicking, D. approached the neighborhood rabbis, and carried on about the “terrible deeds” that are taking place in the neighborhood, and the rumor began to travel at a double speed. D. approached the parents and the administration of the cheder, regarding specific children who, according to her, were “in need of a treatment”.
As the police suspects, D. proceeded to refer them to B., who is also originally from abroad, who is a certified therapist, and she began seeing the children. In accordance with the testimonies which we have received, it appears that by means of specifically formulated questions the “therapist” managed to eventually influence the children, and to install in their minds a “memory” of being kidnapped, transported to a monastery, and tortured. Which, needless to say, never took place. She showed them pictures of monasteries, asking, “which one of these did they take you to?” at first, the children denied that such events ever took place; however, with time, they were persuaded that these things really took place.
One of the rabbis in the neighborhood and two businessmen were accordingly persuaded, and composed a list of hundreds of children, who were “harmed by the sect”, however, they refused to cooperate with any investigation efforts, since, as they claimed, the Christians managed to bribe the authorities, making it futile to seek help with the official agents of the law.
While this was taking place, there were others who refused to buy into the “cult” narrative, among them - the judges from the Eida charedis, the activists from the “Neighborhood purity committee” (Vaad Le-Tohar Ha-Machane), and other rabbis.
About a year and a half ago, it was publicized that parts of the security cameras recordings were deleted, since they recorded indecent acts taking place in the cheder. The police proceeded to open an investigation; however, within a short time they proved the suspicion to be ungrounded. Obviously, this did not help the parents to feel reassured as to the safety of their children. Many of them proceeded to enrol their children in other institutions.
As it seems from the primary investigation, the suspect in collaboration with her partners in crime, managed to gather vast donations from abroad as well as from within Israel, claiming the existence of the cult and the battle that was being waged against it. The funds she managed to obtain, including the payments for the “therapy”, measure well above 1.5 USD.
The police performed a complex, lengthy and thorough investigation, as necessary in the light of the severity of the claims. Yesterday, when the investigation was finally completed, three suspects were arrested and questioned by the police, regarding the allegations of child abuse, (i.e. persuading them that they were kidnapped and causing them emotional trauma constitutes child abuse) and unlawful obtaining of donations
.
The investigation was supervised by the Jerusalem district attorneys and the social services. D. and another man were brought in today to the district court in Jerusalem where they were ordered under home arrest until the next hearing, which is scheduled to take place next Tuesday. [...]
Rabbis Baum and rabbi Berkowitz, who are community rabbis, said that
they were involved in dealing with this issue, and now that it has been
taken care of, surely this school is as safe as any other.
Attorney Yinon Sartel, who is representing the defendant, has addressed the allegations, and said in a statement to the Chadrei Charedim, that the suspect has been waging a lengthy battle on behalf of the children who have suffered from indecent acts and harassment. “She has been working in collaboration with the social services, and ensured that the children received appropriate therapy, she involved a Knesset committee, inviting them for a tour of the neighborhood of Nachlaot; and even persuaded many children to file a complaint at the police station - and some of the complaints ended in conviction.”
Attorney Yinon Sartel, who is representing the defendant, has addressed the allegations, and said in a statement to the Chadrei Charedim, that the suspect has been waging a lengthy battle on behalf of the children who have suffered from indecent acts and harassment. “She has been working in collaboration with the social services, and ensured that the children received appropriate therapy, she involved a Knesset committee, inviting them for a tour of the neighborhood of Nachlaot; and even persuaded many children to file a complaint at the police station - and some of the complaints ended in conviction.”
“She was the only hope for many children in those neighborhoods. She complained time and again about the police lack of action and competence in their dealings with the issue, therefore she was forced to gather donations from generous people, to fill in the gap left by the police inaction.”
According to him, evidence was gathered in order to bring the criminals to court only thanks to the efforts of the private investigator she hired. “So it seems, that her filling the void that was left by their inaction, irritated them, and they proceeded to make up this whole thing, as if she lied to the donors when describing the issues, there is nothing more outrageous than this claim”.
Sartel says, “From her point of view, this struggle is essential; how can one come now and call her a liar - she believes this with her whole heart, and she has plenty of evidence available to prove that this activity is really taking place, but the police chooses the path of inaction. Instead of going after the true perpetrators of these crimes, they decided to attack her, and to level baseless accusation on her.
The judge did not accept the claims presented by the police, and did not extend her detention by four days as requested, but stated that the case is a “legitimate weak suspicion”, and released her under home arrest.” [...]
Sunday, March 26, 2017
Conspiracy Theorist Alex Jones Apologizes For Promoting 'Pizzagate' regarding false child abuse claims
Longtime conspiracy theorist and propagator Alex Jones has apologized
to the Washington, D.C. pizzeria Comet Ping Pong and its owner James
Alefantis for his show's role in promoting the false "pizzagate"
conspiracy theory involving a child sex-abuse ring.
Jones, the host of the radio and web show bearing his name and the owner of the website Infowars, said from a prepared statement
that to his knowledge, "neither Mr. Alefantis, nor his restaurant Comet
Ping Pong, were involved in any human trafficking as was part of the
theories about Pizzagate that were being written about in many media
outlets and which we commented upon."
He continued: "I want our viewers and listeners to know that we
regret any negative impact our commentaries may have had on Mr.
Alefantis, Comet Ping Pong, or its employees. We apologize to the extent
our commentaries could be construed as negative statements about Mr.
Alefantis or Comet Ping Pong, and we hope that anyone else involved in
commenting on Pizzagate will do the same thing."
Jones' apology Friday came the same day
a 28-year-old man pleaded guilty to charges related to a December
incident when he brought an AR-15 rifle and other weapons into the
restaurant and fired shots inside. Edgar Maddison Welch, of Salisbury,
N.C., said he drove from his home to the Washington restaurant to
"self-investigate" the conspiracy theory.
False rumors on the
Internet included allegations that a child sex ring was operating out of
the restaurant's nonexistent basement and that it involved Hillary
Clinton and her former campaign chairman John Podesta. Employees of
Comet have received many threatening phone calls and have been the
targets of online harassment and death threats.
The Daily Beast reported that Welch was a Facebook fan of Jones and Infowars, and Welch told The New York Times he had listened to Jones' radio show.
Multiple times in the statement,
Jones says that "many media outlets" were reporting on the theories; it
could be seen as an attempt to minimize the role his show played in
their promotion.
Despite Jones' claim that the reason for the apology is because "we
think it is the right thing to do," it may have more to do with the
perceived threat of legal action from Alefantis, who wrote to Jones in
February asking for several retractions. The Washington Post's Paul Farhi explains:
"Under Texas law, the Austin-based Jones had to retract or apologize for the stories by Friday — one full month after receiving Alefantis's letter — to avoid exposing InfoWars to punitive damages in a libel suit."
It's rare for Jones to make a public apology. The Infowars website has a correction section. There are only two entries, of which the Comet apology is one.
Infowars
describes the mission of Jones and the website as "seeking the truth
and exposing the scientifically engineered lies of the globalists and
their ultimate goal of enslaving humanity."
NPR's David Folkenflik noted other conspiracy theories Jones has discussed:
"Jones has claimed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were an inside job, that the deadly shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School was a hoax, and that President Obama would round up people into concentration camps."
Jones was not the originator of "pizzagate," however, which has spread on social media and on sites like Reddit. [...]
Social psychology professor Viren Swami of Anglia Ruskin University told NPR's Michel Martin
that it's hard to change someone's belief once that person accepts a
conspiracy theory. "We look for evidence that fits what we already know
or what we already believe, and we try to avoid information or evidence
that we either disagree with or that we know doesn't fit with our
perspective," he said. "And if someone comes along and says, here's the
evidence, your natural tendency's actually to rehearse arguments against
that evidence."
"Donald, This I Will Tell You" [Trump is a fraud and a victim of the Republican party]
NY Times by Maureen Dowd
Dear Donald,
We’ve known each other a long time, so I think I can be blunt.
You know how you said at campaign rallies that you did not like being identified as a politician?
Don’t worry. No one will ever mistake you for a politician.
After this past week, they won’t even mistake you for a top-notch negotiator.[...]
And you, Donald, are getting a reputation as a sucker. And worse, a sucker who is a tool of the D.C. establishment.
Your
whole campaign was mocking your rivals and the D.C. elite, jawing about
how Americans had turned into losers, with our bad deals and open
borders and the Obamacare “disaster.”
And you were going to fly in on your gilded plane and fix all that in a snap.
You
mused that a good role model would be Ronald Reagan. As you saw it,
Reagan was a big, good-looking guy with a famous pompadour; he had also
been a Democrat and an entertainer. But Reagan had one key quality that
you don’t have: He knew what he didn’t know.
You
both resembled Macy’s Thanksgiving Day balloons, floating above the
nitty-gritty and focusing on a few big thoughts. But President Reagan
was confident enough to accept that he needed experts below, deftly
maneuvering the strings.
You’re
just careering around on your own, crashing into buildings and losing
altitude, growling at the cameras and spewing nasty conspiracy theories,
instead of offering a sunny smile, bipartisanship, optimism and
professionalism.
You
promised to get the best people around you in the White House, the best
of the best. In fact, “best” is one of your favorite words.
Instead,
you dragged that motley skeleton crew into the White House and let them
create a feuding, leaking, belligerent, conspiratorial, sycophantic
atmosphere. Instead of a smooth, classy operator like James Baker, you
have a Manichaean anarchist in Steve Bannon.
You
knew the Republicans were full of hot air. They haven’t had to pass
anything in a long time, and they have no aptitude for governing. To
paraphrase an old Barney Frank line, asking the Republicans to govern is
like asking Frank to judge the Miss America contest — “If your heart’s
not in it, you don’t do a very good job.”
You
knew that Paul Ryan’s vaunted reputation as a policy wonk was fake
news. Republicans have been running on repealing and replacing Obamacare
for years and they never even bothered to come up with a valid
alternative.
And
neither did you, despite all your promises to replace Obamacare with
“something terrific” because you wanted everyone to be covered.
Instead,
you sold the D.O.A. bill the Irish undertaker gave you as though it
were a luxury condo, ignoring the fact that it was a cruel flimflam, a
huge tax cut for the rich disguised as a health care bill. You were so
concerned with the “win” that you forgot your “forgotten” Americans, the
older, poorer people in rural areas who would be hurt by the bill.
As
The Times’s chief Washington correspondent Carl Hulse put it, the
G.O.P. falls into clover with a lock on the White House and both houses
of Congress, and what’s the first thing it does? Slip on a banana peel.
Incompetence Inc.[...]
You’re all about flashy marketing so you didn’t notice that the bill was junk, so lame that even Republicans skittered away.
You
were humiliated right out of the chute by the establishment guys who
hooked you into their agenda — a massive transfer of wealth to rich
people — and drew you away from your own.
You
sold yourself as the businessman who could shake things up and make
Washington work again. Instead, you got worked over by the Republican
leadership and the business community, who set you up to do their
bidding.
That’s why they’re putting up with all your craziness about Russia and wiretapping and unending lies and rattling our allies.
They’re
counting on you being a delusional dupe who didn’t even know what was
in the bill because you’re sitting around in a bathrobe getting your
information from wackadoodles on Fox News and then, as The Post
reported, peppering aides with the query, “Is this really a good bill?”
You got played.
It took W. years to smash everything. You’re way ahead of schedule.
And I can say you’re doing badly, because I’m a columnist, and you’re not. Say hello to everybody, O.K.?
Sincerely, Maureen
Friday, March 24, 2017
Rep. Nunes Is a Lapdog in a Watchdog Role
Representative Devin Nunes looked uneasy. Mr. Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was struggling on Monday to elicit details
from James Comey, the F.B.I. director, about his explosive revelation
that the bureau is investigating whether Russia and the Trump
administration colluded to sabotage Hillary Clinton’s presidential
candidacy. That disclosure, Mr. Nunes said, had put “a big, gray cloud”
over the White House.
On
Wednesday, Mr. Nunes tried to replace that cloud with a smoke screen.
In a possible violation of the law, Mr. Nunes described intelligence
reports that he said had suggested that American intelligence agencies
incidentally intercepted communications of then President-elect Trump
and people close to him, and then disseminated the information widely
throughout the intelligence community. His disclosures, which have
destroyed the credibility of his committee in investigating Russian
interference in the election, make clear that he is unfit for the job
and should be replaced.
Mr. Nunes’s remarks, which appeared to be deliberately vague, gave President Trump cover for his baseless claim that President Barack Obama had illegally wiretapped his phones. After making his disclosures during a news conference
on Wednesday, Mr. Nunes went to the White House to brief the president.
In a startling break with tradition, Mr. Nunes, a Republican, briefed
reporters before sharing his findings with fellow members of the
committee, who are from both parties. Mr. Trump portrayed the
congressman’s assertions as a vindication of his widely discredited
accusation. “I very much appreciated the fact that they found what they
found,” Mr. Trump said.[...]
Mr. Nunes unspooled his information on Wednesday over the course of two
news conferences that had a strikingly improvisational air. At one
point, he said he was referring to material that “appears to be all
legally collected foreign intelligence.” Soon afterward, he proclaimed
himself to be “actually alarmed by it.” It was hard to understand
exactly what Mr. Nunes was alleging, perhaps because he didn’t have any
truly alarming revelation to share.
Mr.
Nunes’s remarks left the impression that American intelligence
personnel may have been careless in redacting identifying information of
American citizens whose communications were intercepted as part of the
lawful monitoring of foreigners. He did not, however, claim that
intelligence personnel broke rules.
By
speaking expansively about intelligence gathering, Mr. Nunes may have
broken the law by disclosing classified information, however obliquely.
The congressman, who has assailed leaks to the press, said his
information came from unnamed “sources who thought that we should know
it.” That’s rich. [...]
But Mr. Nunes’s conduct stands out for his brazenness and heedlessness.
His role as a committee chairman is to carry out responsible oversight
of intelligence matters. Instead, he used his position to distract
attention from the crucial question of whether Mr. Trump’s election was
aided by collusion with an adversary.
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Trump’s Defense of His Lies: ‘I’m President and You’re Not’
It is remarkable — and perhaps praiseworthy — that Donald Trump gave a long and detailed interview on the subject of his being a pathological liar. The interview, with Time’s
Michael Scherer, covers a wide range of Trump’s lies, and features many
of his own justifications for them. The truly revealing moment of the
interview comes at the end, when Trump gives up the game. “But isn’t
there, it strikes me there is still an issue of credibility,” asks
Scherer, referencing Trump’s hallucinatory claims to have been
surveilled by his predecessor, which his own intelligence officials have
refuted. Trump rambles through various talking points, and lands on
this conclusion: “I guess, I can’t be doing so badly, because I’m
president, and you’re not.”
This
small line is an important historical marker of the bizarre and
disconcerting reality into which American politics has plunged. Trump is
not merely making an attack on truth here. He is attacking the idea of truth. His statement is a frontal challenge to the notion that objective reality can be separated from power.
Trump
and his officials have been dancing around this notion since November.
When challenged on almost any of their lies, they point to the election,
which proves that the credibility of the crooked Fake News media is
nonexistent, and theirs is beyond reproach. Questions about veracity are
met with responses about voting in Wisconsin, Michigan, and
Pennsylvania. Trump made the argument explicit: The only measure of his
veracity is power, which he has, and his critics do not. [...]
Jewish Center Bomb Threat Suspect is Jewish - Is Arrested in Israel
The
police on Thursday arrested an Israeli teenager who holds American
citizenship in connection with scores of threats to Jewish institutions,
including dozens of community centers in the United States, law
enforcement officials said.
A
spokesman for the police here, Micky Rosenfeld, said the suspect, from
the Ashkelon area of southern Israel, had also made threats to
institutions in Australia and New Zealand, as well as to at least one
commercial airline flight, forcing an emergency landing.
“This is the guy we are talking about,” Mr. Rosenfeld said.
The
authorities did not immediately identify the teenager, who they said
was Jewish and 19. Other reports put his age at 18. He was expected to
appear in court later Thursday.
The
suspect’s motives were not immediately clear. He was being questioned
by the international investigations unit of the Israeli police.
The
arrest took place after a monthslong investigation in cooperation with
the F.B.I. and other police and security agencies in the United States
and Europe, the Israeli police said in a statement.
“The
investigation began in several countries at the same time, in which
dozens of threatening calls were received at public places, events,
synagogues and community buildings that caused panic and disrupted
events and activities in various organizations,” the statement said.
Representatives
of the F.B.I. and police organizations from various other countries
arrived in Israel to take part in the investigation, the statement said,
adding that technology was used to track the suspect down. [...]
Vayakhel 75 - School as a community by Allan Katz
Guest post by Allan Katz
The word for community – ke'hilah comes from the word vayakhel- ויקהל , the opening word of our parasha. There are different types of communities , some positive and some negative depending on their goals and common purpose. And Moses assembled – vayakhel = ויקהל the people so he could share with the community God's commandments to observe the Sabbath and build a mishkan – a tabernacle which would come from the contributions offered by the people. The Sabbath had to observed especially by being careful to focus on bonding through learning and not kindling a fire - including the fire of argument and conflict in the community. The Midrash explains that while community is very important, Moses is setting a precedent, that community life must be based on learning. People should gather on the Sabbath and Moses would teach them about the Sabbath and other laws of the Torah. Houses of prayer, like the study halls should be places of learning as well as for prayer. Community projects like the building of the mishkan- the tabernacle or any other projects that serve the community must be seen in the context of spiritual development and commitment to the Torah. This context is created by communal learning and observing the Torah laws. So community must be based on cooperative learning and projects and be guided by spiritual beliefs. The ideal situation is that people are drawn to a Rabbi and his place of learning and because they learn together, they pray together and participate in communal projects.
Schools are the perfect setting for building a community based on cooperative learning and social projects. Unfortunately many schools are more about instilling obedience and having control .It is for sure not a place that gives kids a voice and tries to inspire them to make their school a better and nurturing place for all. Teachers will use extrinsic motivation like prizes, grades and competition to motivate kids to behave and learn. Kids learn to ask themselves what will I get or what will be done to me. Kids are ranked according to their test scores and how well they behave , and the competitive ones see others as obstacles to their success. It does not help to talk about good character and caring , if the environment is competitive and problems are solved using punishment or bribes. The school has to create an environment which promotes cooperation between kids and pro-social behavior. If we go beyond discipline and grades and focus on community and cooperative learning, kids will learn to ask how do my actions impact on others , how can I make a contribution, what type of school or classroom would I like? Kids will be intrinsically more motivated and develop a love for learning when they can participate in deciding on the curriculum. As one student remarked, my teachers always had the ability to give us the feeling that we decided on what we were going to study and learn. Excellence is not measured by test scores but by taking responsibility for other kids and sharing your learning. Kids see each other as learning resources and look to each for support and friendship. There is the understanding that only a unity of purpose , cooperation and a caring atmosphere where every child is needed and valued, can a community and individuals meet their goals.
Progressive schools see the importance of creating a community of caring learners and the best way children learn is when they are engaged in real-life situations that are important to them. Schools can implement a Jobs Program which allows kids to learn by doing.
Each School Group has a specific job to perform that helps the school community function smoothly. Some groups will tutor and become buddies for younger kids, other groups can run the school newspaper, the school store which supplies stationary and text books , the school garden , be involved in sign making and running the print shop. The children have ample opportunity to practice and expand their academic skills, including mathematics, reading and writing, while further developing leadership, critical thinking and problem-solving tools. Because they are performing real jobs that meet real needs, the children also develop a genuine sense of ownership and pride in their school community.
“Anyone working with or watching these children soon realizes the deeper psychological aspect of this type of program. It gives a child a sense of dignity and responsibility to be entrusted with a job whose importance he fully recognizes...All his abilities are called into play. He learns self-control, patience, self-discipline. He accepts the need for drill and for special work in areas where he is weak, so he will be better able to serve his customers and his community.”
—Jean Murray, former principal of City &Country
—Jean Murray, former principal of City &Country
When community is based on communal and cooperative learning, there is more growth, bonding and commitment to values and to be of service to other kids.
Nunes makes bizarre claim that some Trump transition messages were intercepted
House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes declared Wednesday that members of Donald Trump’s transition team, possibly including Trump himself, were under inadvertent surveillance following November’s presidential election.
The White House and Trump’s allies immediately seized on the statement as vindication of the president’s much-maligned claim that former President Barack Obama wiretapped Trump Tower phones — even though Nunes himself said that’s not what his new information shows.
Democrats, meanwhile, cried foul.
Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the intelligence panel, cast doubt on Nunes’ claims in a fiery statement and blasted the chairman for not first sharing the information with him or other committee members.
Schiff also slammed Nunes for briefing the White House on Wednesday afternoon given that the Intelligence Committee is in the middle of an investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election, including possible collusion with the Trump team.
“The chairman will need to decide whether he is the chairman of an independent investigation into conduct which includes allegations of potential coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russians, or he is going to act as a surrogate of the White House, because he cannot do both,” Schiff said at a news conference Wednesday.
“And unfortunately,” he added, “I think the actions of today throw great doubt into the ability of both the chairman and the committee to conduct the investigation the way it ought to be conducted.”
Nunes set off the firestorm with a news conference earlier in the day in which he described the surveillance of Trump aides through what’s called “incidental collection,” something he noted was routine and legal. Such collection can occur when a person inside the United State communicates with a foreign target of U.S. surveillance. In such cases, the identities of U.S. citizens are supposed to be shielded — but can be “unmasked” by intelligence officials under certain circumstances.
Nunes, himself a Trump transition member, said a “source” had shown him evidence that members of the Trump transition team had been unmasked — and that their identities had been revealed in U.S. intelligence reports. Nunes had previously raised questions about the unmasking of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, whose communications with Russia’s ambassador were intercepted by the U.S. government and whose identity was leaked to the news media.
Nunes suggested this unmasking might have been done for political reasons, saying the evidence he had seen had been widely disseminated across the intelligence community and had "little or no apparent intelligence value." He added that he was trying to get more information by Friday from the FBI, CIA and NSA.
“I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, I guess, at least monitored,” the California Republican told reporters. “It looks to me like it was all legally collected, but it was essentially a lot of information on the president-elect and his transition team and what they were doing.” He said the information he had seen was not related to the FBI’s Russia investigation.[...]
Other Democrats also took issue with Nunes’ decision to go straight to Trump.
Rep. Jim Himes, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Nunes’ trip to the White House “raises all sorts of questions.”
“What if it’s one of the president’s people who is being investigated?” the Connecticut Democrat said in an interview. “Is he going to damage the investigation? It all feels very, very odd.”
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), another member of the intelligence panel, said he was “troubled.”
“The House Intelligence Committee is charged with investigating Russia's interference into our election and whether any U.S. persons were involved,” Swalwell said in a statement. “The chairman's actions and closeness to a president whose campaign is under federal investigation have gravely damaged the Investigation's credibility.”
At the White House, press secretary Sean Spicer read from Nunes' statement during a press briefing, showing how eager Trump's team was to amplify the remarks.
A political action committee associated with Trump, the Great America PAC, sent out a mass fundraising email claiming Trump’s wiretapping claims had proved accurate. Donald Trump Jr. also posted a message to Instagram crowing about Nunes’ comments.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)