May a girl whose father was not Jewish marry or date a
Kohain?
One young lady who recently posed this question to this author
explained: “I have dated more
modern-orthodox Kohanim who told me that they looked into it and their Rabbis
said that it was okay. But I have also
looked into more Yeshivesh Kohanim, and their Rabbi forbade it. Will the real halacha please stand up?”[...]
CONCLUSIONS
Notwithstanding all the factors discussed above, it was the conclusion
of both Rav Elyashiv zt”l and Rav Moshe Feinstein not to rely on the leniencies
involved here and not consider such cases as b’dieved. This is the normative
view in the Torah world. It is this author’s understanding, however, that there
have been some modern orthodox Rabbis who have expressed leniencies in the
scenarios described above.
May a Rabbi officiate at such a wedding? It is this author’s view that it should be
avoided unless the issue of taharas mishpacha is at stake. If the couple will not be observing taharas
hamishpacha on account of the Rabbi not participating then he should be
involved in such a wedding. Otherwise he
should avoid it.
May such a Kohain duchen on Yom Tov or in Israel. It seems that since he may remain married to
her if he did marry, he did not lose his status as a Kohain (see Shvus Yaakov
Vol. I #93 – indicating likewise).
Very interesting question -
ReplyDeleteAlso, what about the reverse situation - the son of a Kohein man, and a non Jewish woman. Does the son have any inherent "kehuna" either before or after he re-converts to Judaism? The reason is that patrilineally, he is a Cohen, whether or not he was born halachically Jewish.
how can someone be a cohen if he has to convert?
Deletethe whole concept of matrilineal and patrilineal in Judaism is illogical.
DeleteHow can someone be from Shevet Yehuda (Jewish) if his father was Bill o'Donald, an Irish catholic, etc?
I am not saying he is a halachic cohen, but he is still a cohen on the paternal genetic side. Hence the paradox.
A child of a gentile father and Jewish mother is NOT from Shevet Yehuda.
DeleteCan anybody give one example of a Rav Elyashiv zt”l psak that has been on the lenient side of the spectrum?
ReplyDeleteRich - there are many. Why dont you crack open one of his various seforim?
ReplyDeleteBut since you ask for only one I'll give you`one. He is lenient about making a bris on shabbos for a baby born via ivf.
Who says that is a Kula, it may be a Chumra of Bris Mila.
DeleteIt's a kula because chillul Shabbos is a d'oraysa while making the bris on the 9th day instead of the 8th is not.
DeleteThat is true, but he could only Pasken like that if he felt that IVF has no impact on Hilchos Mila... it still doesn't show a lenient position in this case only a clarification on the babies status.
DeleteIt is definitely a kula regarding Hilchos Shomer Shabbos, a d'oraysa.
DeleteI will try to explain this one more time... The concept of a Chumra and a Kula is when there are two or more options and we take either the stringent or lenient position. Example, Safek Brachos Lehakeil... a person is unsure if he made a Bracha Reshona, maybe he did, maybe he didn't, we take the lenient position and say, don't make another Beracha because it is a Safek DeRabanan.. that is a Kula.
DeleteNow our case... The only way that there can be a question of a Chumra or a Kula is if there was a question as to the status of this child regarding the day of the Bris. As you rightly point out Shabbos is Deorisa and therefore if there was a question (like with a baby born Bein Hashmosos) he would be unable to Pasken "Lekula" since it is a Safek Deorisa that always goes Lechumra. The only reason that Rav Elyashiv could have Paskened that the Bris is on Shabbos is because he held there is NO SAFEK and therefore the Bris is on its scheduled time.. not Midin Kula but because there is no Safek in the first place. I hope that explains it.
Here are another two of the many lenient rulings from RYSE:
ReplyDeleteRav Elyashiv ruled that hot water running from a faucet is considered a Kli Sheni (כלי שני), while most other deciders of Halacha have ruled that such water is considered a Kli Rishon (כלי ראשון).
Another is example is regarding the law of the separation of meat and milk regarding eating meat and needing to wait six hours before eating milk products and whether you count the six hours from the beginning or end of the meal.
He said even if you hold NYC water is buggy (he officially did) you could use a filter on shabbos and it isn't borer. This reflect a lenient position on a machlokes about parameters of definition of pesoles
ReplyDeleteMany great poskim had both strictures and leniencies. The Chazon Ish was ultra machmir in shiurim. But regarding the relationship with secular, he said they are no longer considered to be kofrim but tinnok shenishba, and hence we bring them back with chords of love.
DeleteThe Chatam Sofer, was ultra machmir on anything new - but it went for kulas as well as chumras.
Rav Ovadia Yosef permitted a Cohen to marry a woman with a non Jewish father in 2006.
ReplyDeleteGood to see you Jersey Girl! Hopefully you can participate in the discussions more frequently. Kesiva VeChasima Tova to you and yours!
DeleteThanks for the answers!
ReplyDelete