Sunday, October 8, 2017

Can an 11-Year-Old Girl Consent to Sex?

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Can an 11-Year-Old Girl Consent to Sex?

By VALENTINE FAURE

October 5, 2017



Alex Majoli/Magnum Photos

PARIS — Last Tuesday, France woke up to news reports that a 28-year-old man and an 11-year-old girl had had “consensual” sex.

The events, first reported by the website Mediapart, took place on April 24 in the Paris suburb of Montmagny. That afternoon, the child followed a man, who had already approached her twice in the previous days, telling her he “could teach her how to kiss and more.” They went to his building, where she performed oral sex in the hallway. Then she followed him to his apartment, where they had sexual intercourse. Afterward, he told her not to talk to anybody about it, kissed her on the forehead and asked to see her again.

On her way back home, the girl called her mother in a state of panic, realizing what had just happened. “Papa is going to think I’m a slut,” she said. The mother immediately called the police and pressed charges for rape. But citing Article 227-25 of the French criminal code, the public prosecutor stated that “there had been no violence, no coercion, no threat, no surprise,” and therefore, the man would be charged only with “sexual infraction.” That offense is punishable by five years in prison, while rape entails 20 years of imprisonment when the victim is under 15.

The trial was supposed to start last Tuesday, but it was postponed to February. Meantime, the story caught fire across the country. The widespread outrage put me in mind of the Jacqueline Sauvage case, in which a battered woman who shot her husband in the back in 2012 ended up getting 10 years of prison (a harsh sentence for France). The verdict prompted wrathful comments from pundits, politicians and the public about the French justice system failing to deliver justice to society’s most vulnerable. (Ms. Sauvage was pardoned and released last year.)

What shocked many French people most of all was not the encounter itself, but that there was a legal possibility of labeling it anything other than rape. If legal norms reflect a society’s mores, what does this say about France? Petitions started circulating, and politicians would soon echo them: The law must change.

Most European countries have, over the past two decades, set age limits under which a minor simply cannot consent. In Belgium, any sexual intercourse with a child below the age of 14 is rape, punishable up to 20 years, or up to 30 years for victims under 10. In Britain, the age of consent is 16, but specific legal protection exists for children under 13: They cannot legally give their consent to any form of sexual activity. There is a maximum sentence of life imprisonment for “rape, assault by penetration, and causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.”

But in France, as long as “violence, coercion, threat or surprise” is not proven, sexual intercourse with a minor — even one under 15 — is considered an “atteinte sexuelle,” which is an infraction and not a crime. The trial takes place in a “tribunal correctionnel,” which handles infractions, and not at a “cour d’assises,” which is for the most serious crimes like murder or rape.

In 2005, the Cour de Cassation, France’s highest criminal court, stipulated that coercion is presumed for children at a “very young age.” That’s an outrageously blurry formulation that in practice has largely been applied to children under 6. This leaves children above 6 potentially considered not raped when violence cannot be established. It also allows the state of paralyzed shock experienced by many victims — and all the more so children — to equal consent.

In 2010, a new law introduced the question of age difference between the victim and the perpetrator from which “moral coercion” could result, expanding the notion of force beyond physical violence. But once again, the difference in age was not precisely qualified. In February 2015, the Constitutional Council reasserted that French law “does not set an age of discernment in regards to sexual relations: It is for the courts to determine whether the minor was capable of consenting to the sexual relationship in question.”

France doesn’t exactly have a sterling record when it comes to labeling sexual criminality. It took two centuries for sexual crimes against children to be considered so by the law. The penal code of 1810, established by Napoleon, did not say much about sexual behavior, “as if sexuality were not to fall under the law,” the philosopher Michel Foucault said in 1978. He deplored the growing “weight” of the laws “controlling” sexuality during the 19th and 20th century.

Foucault was writing a year after the cream of the French intelligentsia published an open letter in Le Monde defending three men charged with having sexual relations with children under the age of 15. The list of signatories included Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilles Deleuze, Roland Barthes, Philippe Sollers, André Glucksmann and Louis Aragon. “We consider that there is an incongruity,” the letter read, “between the outdated nature of the law and the everyday reality of a society which tends to recognize the existence of a sexual life in children and adolescents (if a 13-year-old girl has the right to be on the pill, what is it for?).”

Interdiction, the thinking went, belonged to the old moral order, and it was considered an honor to children to acknowledge that they had desires.

Fortunately, the mainstream culture has turned away from this pedophile-chic ethos. But if France has continued to be reluctant to define a firm age of consent, it probably has to do with the lingering vestiges of idealized sexual freedom.

And linger it does. When the Roman Polanski case resurfaced in 2009, I remember an outraged Alain Finkielkraut, one of the most visible public intellectuals in France, saying on the radio that Mr. Polanski’s 13-year-old victim, Samantha Geimer (nee Gailey), “wasn’t a little girl” because she had agreed to be photographed topless, expressing the all too common belief (and likely hope) that girls and boys can indeed be sexual at a young age.

I grew up in Paris, a very free little girl playing in the streets and riding the Metro. By the time I was 15, I had been exposed to more flashers than I care to remember, a few “frotteurs” (men who take advantage of the crowded trains to rub up against their prey), and one man who followed me into my building to have a conversation about my sexual habits when I was about 8. When I was only dreaming about boys my age, I already was very familiar with the chilling effect of adults inserting themselves into my intimate life.

This was how city kids grew up in the aftermath of sexual “liberation”: navigating these uncomfortable interactions, unaware we maybe were escaping something worse.

Today, I can’t look through the window into a classroom other than my daughter’s without being called to order by the headmistress. Still, what horrifies us as a society and seems to belong to common sense — that every instance of sexual intercourse with a child is, by definition, violent — has been left by the law to be examined case by case. The assault in Montmagny must serve as a moral wake-up call for France.

Valentine Faure is writing a book about the Jacqueline Sauvage case.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter.

13 comments:

  1. The Torah differentiates between an 11 year old bas Yisrael and a 12 year old one.
    פיתוי קטנה אונס הוא

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read closely, interesting: “This was how city kids grew up in the aftermath of sexual “liberation”: navigating these uncomfortable interactions, unaware we maybe were escaping something worse.”
    Torah thought on Sukkot.
    שו"ת ציץ אליעזר חלק טו סימן סד
    (ד) אודות דברי רבינו הגר"א ז"ל שכותב לתרץ הקושיא מדוע שעושים סוכות בתשרי ולא בניסן שהיה תחילת היקף עננים, מפני שכשעשו ישראל את העגל נסתלקו העננים ואז לא חזרו עד שהתחילו לעשות המשכן, ומשה ירד ביוה"כ ולמחרתו הקהיל משה את העם וציוה על מלאכת המשכן, וזה היה בי"א לתשרי, וכתיב והעם הביאו בבקר בבקר עוד ב' ימים, הרי י"ג בתשרי, ובי"ד בתשרי נטלו כל חכם לב ממשה את הזהב במנין ובמשקל, ובט"ו התחילו לעשות ואז חזרו ענני הכבוד, ולכך אנו עושים סוכות בט"ו בתשרי.
    Wikipedia Eliezer Yehuda Waldenberg (December 10, 1915 – November 21, 2006) was known as the Tzitz Eliezer after his monumental halachic treatise Tzitz Eliezer that covers a wide breadth of halacha, including Jewish medical ethics, as well as ritual halachic issues from Shabbat to kashrut. He was born in Jerusalem in 1915 and died there on November 21, 2006.
    “Regarding the words of the Vilna Ga'on, who writes to explain the difficulty of why Sukkot are made in Tishrei and not in Nisan, which was the beginning of the scope of clouds. Because when Israel made The Golden Calf the clouds [Clouds of Glory] disappeared and did not return until the Mishkan began. Moshe went down [from Mount Sinai at end of 40 days from the first of Elul] on Yom Kippur. The next day Moses gathered the people and commanded the work of the Mishkan [to bring the raw materials], and this was on the 11th of Tishrei, Stated in Scripture “They took over from Moses all the gifts that the Israelites had brought, to carry out the tasks connected with the service of the sanctuary. But when these continued to bring freewill offerings to him morning after morning, all the artisans who were engaged in the tasks of the sanctuary came, each from the task upon which he was engaged, and said to Moses, “The people are bringing more than is needed for the tasks entailed in the work that the Lord has commanded to be done.” Moses thereupon had this proclamation made throughout the camp: “Let no man or woman make further effort toward gifts for the sanctuary!” So the people stopped bringing: their efforts had been more than enough for all the tasks to be done.” (Exodus 36:3-7). The people brought it in the morning for another two days, on the 13th of Tishrei, and on the 14th of Tishrei. The gold by count and weight and they began to do [to build the Mishkan]. Then the Clouds of Glory returned. This is why we do Sukkot on the 15th of Tishrei.”
    Valentine Faure writes how city kids grew up down in France. Awful. I, living in Bnei Brak, like better reading Eliezer Yehuda Waldenberg.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm just wondering why you like talking about rape all day. Does Rav Moshe sternbuch endorse this too?

    ReplyDelete
  4. it is va backgrobvious you dont havea yeshiva education

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't understand what you just wrote. I was in yehsiva my whole life and now I'm on kolel

    ReplyDelete
  6. and you are unaware o fdebate on this subj

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm not sure what debate you are talking about.
    You are obsessed with rape and sex and it's sickening.
    I doubt Rav Moshe sternbuch condones all this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. SEE LATEST POST YOU ALSO FIND RAMBAM SICKNG WHAT ABOUT THE TORAH DESCRIPTIONS?!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm sorry but posting these random rape stories is inappropriate. You are a perverted person. זקן נואף. Hashem hates ppl like u.

    ReplyDelete
  10. WE HAVE A REAL NAVI SHAKER IN OUR MIDST!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sam skipped Maseches Kesubos, due to his delicacy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What does that mean?

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.