Thursday, May 12, 2016

Was the Holocaust caused by specific sins? A disagreement between Rav Yitzchok Hutner vs Rav Avigdor Miller

update: The Nesivos Shalom's sefer on the Holocaust can be downloaded  here

update: The words of the Lubavitcher Rebbe seem consistent with the views of Rav Hutner that the Holocaust was not punishment for the sins of that generation.  See also my post on the views of the Lubavitcher Rebbe and Rav Shach   Chabad and the Holocaust 

Chabad itself has the following material

The Rebbe and the Holocaust

Belief after the Holocaust
===============================================
There are those who wish to suggest that the Holocaust was a punishment for the sins of that generation.
 The Lubavitcher Rebbe rejects this view. He stated (Sefer HaSichot 5751 Vol.1 p.233):
The destruction of six million Jews in such a horrific manner that surpassed the cruelty of all previous generations, could not possibly be because of a punishment for sins. Even the Satan himself could not possibly find a sufficient number of sins that would warrant such genocide! 
There is absolutely no rationalistic explanation for the Holocaust except for the fact that it was a Divine decree … why it happened is above human comprehension – but it is definitely not because of punishment for sin. 
On the contrary: All those who were murdered in the Holocaust are called “Kedoshim” – holy ones – since they were murdered in sanctification of G–d’s name. Since they were Jews, it is only G–d who will avenge their blood. As we say on Shabbat in the Av Harachamim prayer, “the holy communities who gave their lives for the sanctification of the Divine Name ... and avenge the spilled blood of His servants, as it is written in the Torah of Moshe ... for he will avenge the blood of his servants ... And in the Holy Writings it is said ... Let there be known among the nations, before our eyes, the retribution of the spilled blood of your servants.” G–d describes those who were sanctified as His servants, and promises to avenge their blood. 
So great is the spiritual level of the Kedoshim – even disregarding their standing in mitzvah performance – that the Rabbis say about them, “no creation can stand in their place.” How much more so of those who died in the Holocaust, many of whom, as is well known, were among the finest of Europe’s Torah scholars and observant Jews. 
It is inconceivable that the Holocaust be regarded as an example of punishment for sin, in particular when addressing this generation, which as mentioned before is “a firebrand plucked from the fire” of the Holocaust. 
In short, one can only apply the words of Isaiah, “My thoughts are not your thoughts and My ways are not your ways, says the L–rd.” (Isaiah 55:8)There are those who wish to suggest that the Holocaust was a punishment for the sins of that generation. 
The Lubavitcher Rebbe rejects this view. He stated (Sefer HaSichot 5751 Vol.1 p.233):
The destruction of six million Jews in such a horrific manner that surpassed the cruelty of all previous generations, could not possibly be because of a punishment for sins. Even the Satan himself could not possibly find a sufficient number of sins that would warrant such genocide! 
There is absolutely no rationalistic explanation for the Holocaust except for the fact that it was a Divine decree … why it happened is above human comprehension – but it is definitely not because of punishment for sin. 
On the contrary: All those who were murdered in the Holocaust are called “Kedoshim” – holy ones – since they were murdered in sanctification of G–d’s name. Since they were Jews, it is only G–d who will avenge their blood. As we say on Shabbat in the Av Harachamim prayer, “the holy communities who gave their lives for the sanctification of the Divine Name ... and avenge the spilled blood of His servants, as it is written in the Torah of Moshe ... for he will avenge the blood of his servants ... And in the Holy Writings it is said ... Let there be known among the nations, before our eyes, the retribution of the spilled blood of your servants.” G–d describes those who were sanctified as His servants, and promises to avenge their blood. 
So great is the spiritual level of the Kedoshim – even disregarding their standing in mitzvah performance – that the Rabbis say about them, “no creation can stand in their place.” How much more so of those who died in the Holocaust, many of whom, as is well known, were among the finest of Europe’s Torah scholars and observant Jews. 
It is inconceivable that the Holocaust be regarded as an example of punishment for sin, in particular when addressing this generation, which as mentioned before is “a firebrand plucked from the fire” of the Holocaust. 
In short, one can only apply the words of Isaiah, “My thoughts are not your thoughts and My ways are not your ways, says the L–rd.” (Isaiah 55:8)


===============================================
The following quotes are taken from a paper written by R Gamliel Shmalo concerning Rav Hutner's view of the Holocaust. The objections that were raised in comments in a previous post regarding Rav Miller's views are similar to those that Rav Hutner raises against Rav Miller's view. He objects to anyone speaking with certainty as if he were a prophet or to say that the Holocaust was a kindness that was deserved by the sins of the Jewish people. In contrast Rav Hutner specifically rejects such an explanation or even the ability to know the truth of such allegations and claims that the Holocaust was part of the suffering of Exile and not because of specific sins. Furthermore Rav Hutner viewed the horrible events as being nothing inherently different than the suffering of the past and in fact described events
as Churban of Europe [similar to the Churban of the Beis HaMikdash] rather than utilize the new word Holocaust.

The last paragraph contains unconfirmed conjecture from the paper as to the possible consequences of the disagreement


Rav Avigdor Miller (Rejoice of Youth Page 350-351) …because so many European Jews fell into the error of admiring and emulating the Germans, G-d allowed the Germans to do their utmost to show who they really are.. Those Jews who had begun to ignore the Soul, and in imitation of the gentiles devoted their efforts solely to the needs of the body, were made to see how their efforts ended in. the worst ruination of Jewish bodies in history ... Because so many imitated the gentiles and refused to rest on the Seventh Day., they were forced to work seven days a week at_ killing labor. Because they sent their children to non-Jewish or .secular schools and no longer gave their children to the Torah-study, the Nazis were allowed to destroy Jewish children entirely. Because, for the first time in Jewish history, women ceased to cover their hair, tbe Germans shaved them bald in the death camps. Because the virtues of chaste dress and behavior were diminished in imitation of tile gentiles, they were marched naked to the gas chambers, and Jewish women were subjected to every barbarous indecency before being killed., Because they had so revered the physicians, especially the German specialists, they were subjected to the malicious experiments and torments which the German physicians impose upon them, Because they forsook the laws of the Torah, they were subjected to the Nuremberg Laws which deprived them of all the rights which other men enjoyed…. 

Rav Yitzchak Hutner (taken from "Interpreters of Judaism in the  Late Twentieth Century" Prof. S. Schwarzchild and  R Matis Greenblatt's "Rabbi Yitzchak Hutner" in Jewish Action  Summer 2001)

The first of these of these epochal changes involves the shift from generations of gentile mistreatment of Jews, which, if unwelcome, was nevertheless expected and indeed announced by our oppressors - to an era where promises of equality were made and then broken, rights were granted and then revoked, benevolence was anticipated, only to be crushed by cruel malevolence. 

The end-result of this period for the Jewish psyche was a significant - .. indeed, crucial - one. From trust in the gentile world, the Jewish nation was cruelly brought to a repudiation of that trust In a relatively short historical period, disappointment in the non-Jewish world was deeply imprinted upon the Jewish soul.
[…]
It should be needless to say at this point that since the churban of European Jewry was a tochacha phenomenon, an enactment of the admonishment and rebuke which Kial Yisroel carries upon its shoulders as an integral part of being the Am Hanivchar - G-d's chosen ones - we have no right to interpret these events as any kind of specific punishment for specific sins. The tochacha is a built-in aspect of the character of Kial Yisroel until Moshiach comes and is visited upon Kial Yisroel at the Creator's will and for reasons known and comprehensible only to Him. One would have to be a נביא or תנא (a prophet or a Talmudic sage), to claim knowledge of the specific reasons for what befell us; anyone on a lesser plane claiming to do so tramples in vain upon the bodies of the kedoshim who died 'על קידוש ה' and misuses the power to interpret and understand Jewish history.

כנראה ,ראש ישיבה חיים ברלין (רב הוטנר) והמשגיח הרוחני שלה (רב אביגדור מילד) היו מחולקים בנושא" .רב מילד הביא את ספרו הנ"ל לדפוס נשבת 1962 והוא יצא לאור בפועל בשנת 1963  ; מעניין שהרב מילד עזב את הישיבה בשנת 1964 - עובדה האומרת דרשני. יש בזקרם לשייר שמבחינתו של הרב הוטנר, רב מילר הקצין · את השיטה המסורתית עד נקודת שבירת הכלים. רב הוטנר איבד בשואה קרובי משפחה שהיה בעיניו צדיקים וקדושים: מסופר בחוג הישיבה 68 שדודו היה כה רגיש לכבוד התורה שהוא מת מהתקף לב כשהוא ראה חייל נאצי יורק על ספר התורה. לא ייתכן להסביר את מיתתם של ''קדושים" האלו באופן כל כך גס, ועל כן הרב הוטנר חיפש פשר חילופי . קשה להוכיח מה היו מניעיו של הרב הוטנר; מה שברור הוא שבעולם הישיבות, הגישה שלו הייתה 
יוצאת מן הכלל, אם כי היו תקדימים 
68
 


142 comments:

  1. Which statement is unconfirmed conjecture from the paper as to the possible consequences of the disagreement?

    ReplyDelete
  2. whether Rav Miller left Chaim Berlin as the result of this disagreement

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know firsthand that it has nothing to do with it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gedolim disagree with each other all the time on a variety of issues.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The critics of Rav Hutner's view (as published in the Jewish Observer) were arguing a) there is no thing called "Daas Torah" and that it is a myth, and b) there was no clear causality between aveiros in Europe and the Shoah. It is argued, for example, that most of Germany's Jews in fact escaped, especially the secular/reformists, while most of the frum Jews in E. Europe perished.
    But some Dati Tzionim actually used similar arguments, that it was punishment for assimilation and for rejection of Hashem's atchalta d'geula - namely Zionism.
    In sum, everyone can argue his corner, and find a cause, but the cause is usually someone else's corner. Yet others say there is no clear cause, and the Gemara says they will get us just for the fact that we are Jews and keep the Torah.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The fact that the churban is not that "special" doesn't contradict Rabbi Miller's thesis.
    I believe Rabbi Hutner's essay was written in The JO

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2013/04/rav-hutner-holocaust-j-observer-1977.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. this is a previous article on the controversy of Rav Hutner's JO article
    http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2013/04/rav-hutner-holocaust-j-observer-1977.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's a specific machlokes. I know if a few gedolim who said was for specific stuff. Ie r dessler part 3 in sod tekufaseinu and r elchonon in ikvisa dmshicha (epoch of the Messiah )to name a few.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Rabbi Berel Gershenfeld is the dean of Machon Shlomo and is also involved with Meor. He is an odom choshuv.

    Rabbi Shimon Schwab z"l also seems to have followed Rav Hutner's approach. I'm not one to machnis roshi bain haharim hoailu but personally Rabbi Miller's approach explains the meaning of these events and answers how this fits into the kindness and benevolence of Hashem for the benefit of the good of Klal Yisroel.

    I don't understand the other approach but Rav Hutner z"l indicates that it requires a novi.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Garnel IronheartMay 4, 2016 at 2:17 AM

    I have it on good authority that the Holocaust was caused by rabbis who think that having memorized the Talmud qualifies them to act as if God let them into the secret way He runs the universe.

    ReplyDelete
  12. how about the secularism of Zionism and the secularism of anti-zionism?

    ReplyDelete
  13. The Torah actually tells us "b'gadol" or in general how Hashem runs the world, at lest in terms of reward and punishment or brachah and ch'v klalah. The process continues until the entire people have done teshuva, so in that case, it is hard to pinpoint are we suffering for our own individual sins, or those from previous generations that are still going unpaid? It is easy to blame those we disagree with. The "trick" or to be more specific, the Torah instruction, is that we see our own ways and do our own teshuva.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with R. Hutner. Jews were always persecuted, expelled from one city to another, expelled from countries like France and killed by the thousands in Eastern Europe and Russia since the first Cruzade. The Holocaust was born due to the deep rooted european hatred of jews, not because of lack of religiosity. If so, how to explain the 'free lifestyle' of mizrahim jews who enjoyed relative peace with their non-jewish neighbors for thousands of years?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think that the blessings Yitzchak gave Yaakov and Esav played some part in the Holocaust.

    Let's accept that the Nazis manifested at least an aspect of Esau/Edom, and there is evidence in fact to back up this assumption.

    The expectation that nations have when Jews live among them is that the economy will prosper. When that fails to happen, Edom rises up. There was public hatred of Jews in America during the Depression, too, leading up to WWII.

    There's a reason Jews are chosen fill the most prominent positions at the Federal Reserve. But when the economy hiccups, a cursory survey of online forums will reveal haters of Jews popping up all over.

    So when the Germany economy was in tatters, it was natural that hatred was on the rise against Jews. In fact, it was the centerpiece of Nazi propaganda to blame the bad economy on Jews.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Gemara says אם רואה אדם שיסורין באים עליו יפשפש במעשיו. It is mashma from Rashi that one should look for something that is likely to deserve such yisurim.
    On the other hand when there is a gzaira on Klal Yisroel and not just on an individual, the pishpush becomes very complicated. If we can find words in Chazal which clearly say that such events come from such actions, that would be as good as a navi. But if the Chazal lends itself to various interpretations, then we still don't know. For anyone to decide on his own without the words of Chazal that a particular action would have caused Klal Yisroel to deserve such punishment, he would have to have ruach hakodesh, because he has no written source and simple opinions of people can't figure out things of this nature. So the question here is whether we believe that Rav Miller was speaking simply out of his personal wisdom or he had clear proofs from Chazal or he spoke with ruach hakodesh. If it was his own wisdom that wouldn't be reliable, but the second or third choices would be.

    ReplyDelete
  17. “Was the Holocaust caused by specific sins? A disagreement between Rav Yitzchok Hutner vs Rav Avigdor Miller”

    My theory is that Rabbi Miller in Rejoice O Youth is crying against sins of his day, in style of Jeremiah and Micah etc. Interesting to see what sins Rabbi Millere complained about. Jeremiah complained about adultery:

    “Why should I forgive you? Your children have forsaken Me And sworn by no-gods. When I fed them their fill, They committed adultery And went trooping to the harlot’s house. They were well-fed, lusty stallions, Each neighing at another’s wife. Shall I not punish such deeds? —says the Lord— Shall I not bring retribution On a nation such as this?” (Jeremiah 5:7-9).

    TE is committing adultery with her marriage without a get relying on the Greenblatt-Kamenistkys heter. Why are important rabbis in the USA silent on this crazy heter? They were trying to keep Mendel Epstein out of jail, but now Mendel Epstein et al are in jail.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Someone came into the Chazon Ish ZT"L with "questions" about the Holocaust. The Chazon Ish ZT"L took out a chumash and opened it up to the Tochacha and said: It says that if you do "this", you will get "this." They did "this" and they got "this." What is your question?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Many of the people killed in the Holocaust were frum. Rav Miller's explanation as well as what you claimed is that of the Chazon Ish doesn't explain why they were killed while many of the secular Jews escaped

    ReplyDelete
  20. Ten percent of the Jewish population of Europe was frum. Many, Many more people were not. I'm sure that by both the Churban Bayis Rishon and Sheni many people were also frum.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Garnel IronheartMay 4, 2016 at 3:45 PM

    That's an excellent point. When one looks at the explanations for the second Churban in the writings of Chazal one does not find statements like "It was the Tzadokim!" or "It was the people who ate chometz on Pesach!" The criticisms are reflected back on the talmidei chachamim themselves. What did they do to bring about the Churban?
    Nowadays it's the opposite. It's everyone else's fault and the talmidei chachamim will be happy to tell you who everybody else is. But us? No, not us!

    ReplyDelete
  22. It says in the seforim that often Hashem will extract punishment from the tzaddikim of the world for the sins of the hamon hoam.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Where did you pull that 10% figure from?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Al meh ovdo ho'oretz? Al asher ozvu es toirosi!

    ReplyDelete
  25. There is also such a thing as a gezeira on the community in general.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Chazal give numerous reasons for the Churban Bayis. Chazal cite that the women weren't dressing tzanua, Chazal cite sinas chinam and Chazal cite other reasons for the churban.

    ReplyDelete
  27. 10% of the Holocaust victims were frum. I think that Rabbi Miller also mentioned this figure.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Rabbi Miller spoke about chillul Shabbos being rampant in Kovno-Slobodka. I heard the same about Telz from a very reliable source.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Again, I asked for a source for this 10% figure specifically. "Rampant" doesn't necessarily mean 90% or close thereof.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Many of the people killed in the Churban of the Beis HaMikdash were frum, and that didn't stop Hashem, the Neviim and Chazal to attribute the calamity to sins (including specific ones). The answer over there applies here as well.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Secularism of anti Zionism?

    ReplyDelete
  32. George Von HermanMay 5, 2016 at 12:27 AM

    that is a very low number - please prove it

    ReplyDelete
  33. Rabbi Miller said that everyone including tzadikim has aveiros. In general, Hashem does not punish to the full extent and is nohaig bemidas harachamim and people are given the opportunity to do teshuva and if yesurim is necessary, it is given over time in smaller doses than the full punishment.

    When reshus is given lemashchis lechabel shuv aino mavchin bain tzadik lerosho and at that time no leniency at all may be shown and the full extent of the punishment would be applied even to tzaddikim. Sometimes people don't even deserve that and a tzaddik can accept yesurim to be mechaper on klal yisroel and the tzaddik is given a great reward for receiving this punishment which really doesn't apply to him. The same thing can be said about yesurim beyond the chait of an individual tzaddik which fulfills Hashem's ratzon to be matil necessary yirah for which the recipient will also be rewarded.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Rav Hutner seems have disagreed with you

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yes, in that if we follow the argument of the Frum Tzionim, the act of anti-Zionism was actually a rebellion against Hashem, since His plan was to ingather the exiles.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Disagreed with what? Chazal write in the gemora that the churban bayis was because of sinas chinum, women putting on too much cosmetics (Shabbos 62b) and other specific reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Strange comment - what he is reported to have said makes no sense, in light of the numerous Pesukim and Maamarei Chazal. My opinion has nothing to do with it. וצריך עיון גדול..

    ReplyDelete
  38. Please give me a reason why the ratio of frum to non-frum Jewish Holocaust victims is not representative of the greater European Jewish population.

    ReplyDelete
  39. R. Eidensohn, Rav Hutner was not a novi. There are many ma'amarei chazal that support Rav Avigdor Miller's mehalach. Although it seems like you have taken a side in this machlokes, "Rav Hutner seems have disagreed with you" is not a sufficient reply. And please also put up a picture of Rav Avigdor Miller while you are at it. I can send you one if you need it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Rav Hutner addresses these issues and was obviously well aware of what Chazal say. Thus your objections come down to the fact that Rav Hutner disagreed with your understanding and that of Rav Miller.

    I have a picture of Rav Miller - will add it

    ReplyDelete
  41. What do you, R. Eidensohn, have to say about the ma'amarei chazal? And do you know of any ma'amrei chazal to the contrary?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Please give me a source for your 10% figure, whether than 10% allegedly is the percent of victims or the percent of the prewar population.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Again - how do you understand Rav Hutner's clear assertions?

    The starting point for discussion to acknowledge that there is a significant differences between these two talmidei chachomim.

    Then we can start asking why didn't Rav Miller agree with Rav Hutner and why Rav Hutner did not agree with Rav Miller

    ReplyDelete
  44. Maybe this will bridge the gap a little.

    Rav Hutner never said that the Holocaust was not for specific sins. He clearly said that the Holocaust was a "Tochacha phenomenon." He just said that we do not have the right to interpret the events as specific punishment for specific sins. I also don't know if Rav Miller or others ever said with the certainty of a Navi that the Holocaust was specifically for one single sin or another. But I think that everyone would agree that there was definitely a general downturn in Torah observance in Europe over the years and it was spiraling out of control, and the Jewish nation as a whole was of a sinfulness that warranted a Tochachah-level punishment.

    What I feel definitely can't be said is that the Jews of Europe were not culpable in any way for the Holocaust, and it is just some historical phenomenon called galus. Because that does not fit with the concept of schar ve'onesh, which is one of the 13 Ikkarim.



    According to my personal understanding, and according to the hanhaga of many gedolim, I see nothing wrong with trying to attribute a certain (private or public) calamity to a specific maaseh or derech, although we will never know for certain. Because the alternative is that Hashem as chas veshalom done something for no reason.



    This is clearly stated in the Gemara in Berachos (Daf daled?) when Rav Huna had 400 barrels of wine turn to vinegar. His friends said to him, "maybe you have done something improper?" He answered, "Am I suspect in your eyes?" To which they replied, "and is Hashem suspect in your eyes as having done something without just cause?" He then agreed to his friends and searched his actions and found something that he had done. He rectified the matter and Hashem allowed him to recover his loss.

    ReplyDelete
  45. http://classic.frumteens.com/topic.php?topic_id=9591&forum_id=32&topic_title=War+in+E%26quot%3BY&forum_title=Interesting+Articles+and+Stuff+for+Teens&M=0

    ReplyDelete
  46. http://classic.frumteens.com/topic.php?topic_id=9591&forum_id=32&topic_title=War+in+E%26quot%3BY&forum_title=Interesting+Articles+and+Stuff+for+Teens&M=0

    ReplyDelete
  47. Ah I hear. Extremism is avoda zara. Like after the meraglim there were people who overmined and went straight to e "y (and got killed, cause hashem didn't tell them to go)

    ReplyDelete
  48. While you are quoting that gemora you might want to quote the previous amud - 5a

    Raba (some say, R. Hisda) says: If a man sees that painful sufferings visit him, let him examine his conduct. For it is said: Let us search and try our ways, and return unto the Lord.21 If he examines and finds nothing [objectionable], let him attribute it to the neglect of the study of the Torah. For it is said: Happy is the man whom Thou chastenest, O Lord, and teachest out of Thy law.22 If he did attribute it [thus], and still did not find [this to be the cause], let him be sure that these are chastenings of love. For it is said: For whom the Lord loveth He correcteth.23


    Berachos(5b):
    Once four hundred jars of wine belonging to R. Huna turned sour. Rab Judah, the brother of R. Sala the Pious, and the other scholars (some say: R. Adda b. Ahaba and the other scholars) went in to visit him and said to him: The master ought to examine his actions.18 He said to them: Am I suspect in your eyes? They replied: Is the Holy One, blessed be He, suspect of punishing without justice? — He said to them: If somebody has heard of anything against me, let him speak out. They replied: We have heard that the master does not give his tenant his [lawful share in the] vine twigs. He replied: Does he leave me any? He steals them all! They said to him: That is exactly what the proverb says:19 If you steal from a thief you also have a taste of it!20 He said to them: I pledge myself to give it to him [in the future]. Some report that thereupon the vinegar became wine again; others that the vinegar went up so high that it was sold for the same price as wine.

    or this one 5b

     R. Hiyya b. Abba fell ill and R. Johanan went in to visit him. He said to him: Are your sufferings welcome to you? He replied: Neither they nor their reward.9 He said to him: Give me your hand. He gave him his hand and he10 raised him.

    R. Johanan once fell ill and R. Hanina went in to visit him. He said to him: Are your sufferings welcome to you? He replied: Neither they nor their reward. He said to him: Give me your hand. He gave him his hand and he raised him. Why could not R. Johanan raise himself?11 — They replied: The prisoner cannot free himself from jail.12

    R. Eleazar fell ill and R. Johanan went in to visit him. He noticed that he was lying in a dark room,13 and he bared his arm and light radiated from it.14 Thereupon he noticed that R. Eleazar was weeping, and he said to him: Why do you weep? Is it because you did not study enough Torah? Surely we learnt: The one who sacrifices much and the one who sacrifices little have the same merit, provided that the heart is directed to heaven.15 Is it perhaps lack of sustenance? Not everybody has the privilege to enjoy two tables.16 Is it perhaps because of [the lack of] children? This is the bone of my tenth son! — He replied to him: I am weeping on account of this beauty17 that is going to rot in the earth. He said to him: On that account you surely have a reason to weep; and they both wept. In the meanwhile he said to him: Are your sufferings welcome to you? — He replied: Neither they nor their reward. He said to him: Give me your hand, and he gave him his hand and he raised him.


    It is also of note that telling someone that their sins are the reason for their misfortune goes against another BM 58b- not to be like the friends of Job.

    If he is visited by suffering, afflicted with disease, or has buried his children, one must not speak to him as his companions spoke to Job, is not thy fear [of God] thy confidence, And thy hope the integrity of thy ways? Remember, I pray thee, who ever perished, being innocent?15

    ReplyDelete
  49. "If he examines and finds nothing objectionable"-- but he must examine!

    And I never said that we should walk up to a holocaust survivor and tell him that he was punished for his sins. But in the context of history, we must search for reasons, just as reasons were given for Gezeiros Tach VeTat and the Inquisiton by great gedolim. As the saying goes, Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I heard this in the name of Rab Miller. Why do you find this difficult to believe?

    ReplyDelete
  51. As if Rabbi Eidensohn suddenly holds of being מבטל דעת to Gedolim against his understanding of the sources! What a strange world.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Daas Torah has already dealt with this issue, but with different בעלי פלוגתא:

    http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2014/07/understanding-chabad-holocaust-rav.html

    ReplyDelete
  53. Daas Torah has already dealt with this issue, but with different בעלי פלוגתא:

    http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2014/07/understanding-chabad-holocaust-rav.html

    ReplyDelete
  54. that doesn't seem to be Rav Miller's approach. He states that it is obvious why the Holocaust happened - it was simply mida kneged mida. Therefore anyone who suffered clearly deserved what he got - according to Rav Miller.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Is Rav MIller considered to be on a par with Rav Hutner in terms of gadlus? My impression was that he was not one of the major Gedolei HaDor or Roshei Yeshiva.

    ReplyDelete
  56. He was talking about the klal, not about each individual person who got killed.

    ReplyDelete
  57. the post was about the two opposing views of major talmidei chachomim -

    ReplyDelete
  58. 1. Mizrahi Jews were persecuted during the Spanish inquisition.
    2. Mizrahi Jews did not have a mass exodus from religion as did the Ashkenazi Jews during the Haskala.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I would like to hear the context. Perhaps you're mistaken or mis-remembering. Where can this figure be seen or heard from Rav Miller? His Tapes are numbered.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Rav Miller was very high up. I won't compare one to another, but Rav Miller's levaya closed down Ocean Parkway for several avenues with many of the gedolim of the litvish, chasidish and sefardic world giving hespedim in what was probably the biggest funeral in the Jewish world in American history.

    ReplyDelete
  61. This was the view of Eim Habanim Smeicha.
    Remember, the reform was also anti-zionist.

    ReplyDelete
  62. who were the Mizrahi Jews? The Spanish were the real Spehardim, but Mizrahi refers to those east of Israel - eg Iraq, Yemen, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  63. The Reform was split. The head of the American Reform, Stephen Samuel Wise, was a Zionist leader.

    ReplyDelete
  64. 50% of Spanish Jewry converted to Christianity.

    ReplyDelete
  65. It is difficult to compare, but for example, Rav Hutner was on the Moetzes Gedolei HaTOrah, whilst RAv Miller was not. This is not always definitive, for exampe, Rav Yaakov Weinberg was (as mentioned by RAP) not on the Moetzes, but was still a Gadol.

    ReplyDelete
  66. The Tosfos Yom Tov famously declared that Gezeras Tach VTat was due to talking in shul. He lived long after the close of Nevuah. I understood Rav Hutner's main objection was that it was just too soon after the Churbon to reason out specific sins that generated the Churbon because of the pain it may cause to survivors that were Tzadikim. I have no doubt that the main sin causing the Churbon in Europe was the advent of Secular Zionism. At the back of a well known anti-Aguda book, the author reprinted five or six letters of Gedolim who lived 30-40 years before the Churbon of Europe. The letters were their comments about the Zionist Movement and its then recent conferences headed by Herzl. All the letters either stated or intimated that this movement would generate a tremendous Churbon in Klal Yisroel. These Gedolim weren't Neviim, they were Chachomim, V'Rau es ha nolad.

    ReplyDelete
  67. I didn't see that Rav Hutner said it was too early - where do you think he said such a thing?

    Furthermore if it was so obvious that the Holocaust was going to happen then why was it so widely denied by gedolim when it came?

    ReplyDelete
  68. 50% of what - the total population of Jews from 1300 to 1500? or 50% of the Jews that remained after a large part of the population was killed?

    Bottom line where did you get that percent?

    ReplyDelete
  69. I didn't see it either, I said I understood it that way because many have said it in response to Rav Miller's Mehalech. What was denied by Gedolim when it came?

    ReplyDelete
  70. It wasn't split and how did he sell out European Jews to be friends with FDR?

    this from Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Samuel_Wise

    Rabbi Wise was an early supporter of Zionism, and his support for, and commitment to Political Zionism was very atypical of Reform Judaism, which was historically and decidedly non-Zionist since the Pittsburgh Platform in 1885. He was a founder of the New York Federation of Zionist Societies in 1897, which led in the formation of the national Federation of American Zionists (FAZ), a forerunner of the Zionist Organization of America. At the Second Zionist Congress (Basel, 1898), he was a delegate and secretary for the English language. Wise served as honorary secretary of FAZ, in close cooperation with Theodor Herzl until the latter's death in 1904.[3]

    In 1933 while acting as honorary president of the American Jewish Congress, Wise led efforts for a Jewish Boycott of Germany. He stated "The time for prudence and caution is past. We must speak up like men. How can we ask our Christian friends to lift their voices in protest against the wrongs suffered by Jews if we keep silent? What is happening in Germany today may happen tomorrow in any other land on earth unless it is challenged and rebuked. It is not the German Jews who are being attacked. It is the Jews".[9] Urged by Wise to protest to the German government, U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull issued a mild statement to the American ambassador to Berlin complaining that "unfortunate incidents have indeed occurred and the whole world joins in regretting them."
    Wise, along with Leo Motzkin and Nahum Goldmann, encouraged the creation in August 1936 of the World Jewish Congress in order to create a broader representative body to fight Nazism. Wise served as founding president of the World Jewish Congress president until his death in 1949. He was succeeded by his friend Nahum Goldmann.
    On November 24, 1942, after being informed by U.S. Under-secretary of State Sumner Welles, Wise held a press conference in Washington, D.C. and announced that the Nazis had a plan for the extermination of all European Jews, and had already killed 2 million; unfortunately, it didn't make front page news.[10] The information was based on the Riegner Telegram, a message sent to Wise in August 1942 by Gerhart M Riegner, then representative of the World Jewish Congress in Geneva, informing the Allies about the so-called "Final Solution of the Jewish question", the German plan to exterminate the European Jews, for the first time.

    ReplyDelete
  71. I heard it many years ago from someone who knew the topic. I see Wikipedia cites, with sources, that a majority of Spanish Jewry converted to Catholicism.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Spain

    ReplyDelete
  72. Wise opposed the efforts to rescue European Jews. He also told FDR not to meet the rabbinical delegation (that included Rav Moshe) that came to ask for his support in rescuing European Jewry. Wise opposed American Jews sending money to European Jews. Wise opposed the American Jews who initiated rescue efforts.

    ReplyDelete
  73. The destruction of the Jews was denied despite growing evidenceand those who tried leaving Europe were discouraged by the leaders

    Rabbi Aharon Rakkefet told me that Rav Solveitchik felt that many died because of the lack of independent thinking by the masses and too high a reliance on the views of the rabbinic leadership

    ReplyDelete
  74. What was denied by the gedolim?

    ReplyDelete
  75. this is an ancient question. Wise was opposed to illegal actions to save the Jews - he was not opposed to saving them. The issue came up again when the opportunity of sending money and equipment to the Nazis to save Hungarian Jews.

    A similar question was raised with dealing with tje Russian Jews. There were those who called for demonstrations while others said everything should be done privately without public confrontation to avoid provoking the Russians.

    Bottom line - it is not clear which strategy would have worked better and ultimately whether anything could be done to make a significant rescue. The same logic that you are using has been raised against the Jewish leadership in general and the European leadership in particular.

    There was also a significant difference between Rav Aharon Kotler and Rav Weissmandel out what should be done

    ReplyDelete
  76. There wasn't any opportunity for the masses of regular Jews to leave Europe once the war was underway and it was known they were targeting Jews for murder. The countries the Jews might have gone to closed their borders and only permitted a tiny number of people to enter. So it wasn't like they could have escaped if they wanted to. The doors were closed.

    ReplyDelete
  77. It's always easy to have 20/20 hindsight.
    Another problem is that we see several references of predictions/prophecies of Gedolim that it would happen, for example the Chofetz Chaim, who is claimed to have said that there would be whirlwind coming from Berlin etc. Why then, didn't people take heed?

    ReplyDelete
  78. that the Jews were being exterminated

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/178913/satmar-rebbe-1

    ReplyDelete
  79. Sounds like you understand the issue for European Jews but not the Spanish Jews who faced even worse conditions including the prohibition of leaving with any money or valuables

    ReplyDelete
  80. That source is quite unreliable. Especially on this topic. That article, in particular, is full of holes.

    Furthermore, the gedolim are not neviim. They aren't expected to be able to predict the future, if and when war will come, who and where will be affected, where it is safest, when to flee or even whether to flee. Oftentimes people fled one war zone into an area that turned out to be unsafer than the one they left.

    And there wasn't any opportunity for the masses of regular Jews to leave Europe once the war was underway and it was known they were targeting Jews for murder. The countries the Jews might have gone to closed their borders and only permitted a tiny number of people to enter. So it wasn't like they could have escaped if they wanted to. The doors were closed.

    (Palestine in particular was closed by the British due to the years beforehand that the Zionists activities triggered Arab resentment and British countermeasures to stop the zionist activities. And America's door was closed, as we all know the immigration laws of the time.)

    Furthermore, very few Jews had the necessary resources to leave their country with their families even had they wanted to.

    ReplyDelete
  81. I don't agree with your defense of Wise, whose actions I maintain are utterly undefendable, but regarding your other point - what differences existed between Rav Aharon Kotler and Rav Weissmandel>

    ReplyDelete
  82. Jews were discouraged from even trying - sorry your argument is not convincing. In general it was felt that it was better to die in Europe then to go Zionist Israel or hefker America

    ReplyDelete
  83. They faced different threats and I'm not sure they're comparable. Spanish Jewry was told to convert to Christianity or forfeit their home, money and property. There can't be a justification of converting to Christianity even if one must give their life up, let alone all their property and home.

    European Jewry wasn't aware of what was about to hit them. Even if they had been the vast majority couldn't leave even if they wanted to. And the threat was to their lives without being given any opportunity to save themselves by leaving. And all this was unpredictable, unless one was a novi, until it was too late.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Rav Weismandel accused Rav Aharon Koter of being a murderer because he felt he had divertered money to support Talmidei chachomim with food and shelter in Shanghai and consequently leaving the masses to die

    ReplyDelete
  85. Is this accusation recorded anywhere? How did the two get along after WWII was over?

    ReplyDelete
  86. I know Rav Elchonon hy'd wrote on a letter that it was better to face the risk of a physical death in Europe than to be saved by Yeshiva University, where they would face risking a spiritual death. He wrote the latter is worse. So this is a point the gedolim felt it was in fact worth dying for, if necessary. And that is a legitimate position.

    ReplyDelete
  87. http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/02/12/elchonon_wasserman_letter_about_yu.jpg

    Baruch Hashem, Erev Shabbos Kodesh Naso

    I received your letters but I have no ability to do anything with this, thus I did not respond.

    The yeshivos in America which are able to bring over students are the yeshivas of Dr. Revel (named Yeshiva University) in New York and Beis Midrash L'Torah in Chicago and they both are places of danger in terms of spirituality because they conduct themselves in a spirit of freedom, and what benefit is there to flee from a physical danger to a spiritual danger, but I sent your letter to the revered Gaon, Rabbi Moshe Heiman, Dean of Mesivtha Torah V'Daas in Brooklyn and I suggested that he request of the revered Dean of the Mirrer Yeshiva that he should also write to Brooklyn to the address below:

    Rabbi Shlomo Heiman
    92 Martin Street
    America

    Blessing you with life and peace and all good things forever,

    Elchanan Bunim Wasserman

    ReplyDelete
  88. Even if that is true, it has nothing to do with the reason why Hashem allowed the Churbon. Perhaps, as Rav Elchonon stated, The Jews of Europe were a korbon Kapora for the Jews in America and E"Y. If it was a Gezera because of a particular sin, such as the redefinition of Judaism to Secular Zionism, then if all the Jews had left Europe when things became ominous, the Churbon would have taken place elsewhere or in some other form!

    ReplyDelete
  89. I heard it from someone who was told this by a prominent frum historian

    ReplyDelete
  90. Moe I disagree - being told to leave without any money and no way to purchase food or shelter for yourself and family is not simply a death threat but a death of slow agony which your family and friends starve and be beaten or tortured by not only bandits but by the good Christian citizens and soldiers

    European Jews were aware to various degrees and surely as the war progressed. No you didn't have to be a navi. But it definitely was easier to believe that the Germans would someone not kill everyone.

    Point being you are much harsher in judging the Spanish Jews for not accepting torture and death then you are in European Jews being passive and preferring not to fear for the worst - even when they did have alternatives.

    ReplyDelete
  91. What evidence do you have that the people were discouraged from leaving by the vast majority of Rabbonim? How do you find statistics for that? Perhaps many were told to try to go to safer European countries where the Rabbonim, not being neviyim, thought they would be safe and not exposed to the deleterious influence of an irreligious Jewish society? No one could have predicted the total take over of Europe by the Nazis that occurred. What alternatives were there? Those boats that reached foreign shores were refused entry.

    Blaming the Torah leaders of Europe for not allowing the Jews to go to Israel is an old anti religious Zionist canard. Those that were able to leave did. The entire Mirrer Yeshiva went to Shanghai.

    As far as going to Israel is concerned, Greenberg, who was in charge of immigration to Israel, refused to make any efforts to save Jews or to let them in. He said a cow in Israel is more important that a Jew in Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Mizrahim are Jews from Middle and Far East... did Spanish Inquisition travel that far? Spanish Inquisition persecuted Sephardic (Iberian Peninsula) Jews only, no?

    By what I hear and read, the Mizrahi (Middle East and North of Africa) jewish identity was more cultural than religious, actually. They were connected to Torah and mitzvot, but lacked rituals. From letters written by Ashkenazi rabbis who traveled to Israel in the 15th century and later, it seems like majority of Mizrahim bought food from non-jewish vendors, celebrated Shabbat in a very different way that would horrify any good Ashkenazi, etc.

    I read today a very interesting and long article about Germans exterminating African tribes some decades before the Holocaust, using the same techniques of death camps, labor camps, experiments, dehumanization, etc. Later, when the Nazis took over, they had already the whole layout of how to conduct the extermination of jews based on what they did in Africa.

    Just saying that because there's much more to the Shoah than what we think. Over 1000 years of european extreme anti-semitism speaks louder to me than the birth of the haskala as the main cause for it...

    ReplyDelete
  93. The doors to the world were closed to European Jewry and the masses had nowhere to run.

    ReplyDelete
  94. did you read the letter you posted? There were clearly opportunities that were closed from within the community either directly or indirectly by the rabbinic leadership

    ReplyDelete
  95. It is interesting that you claim that the leadership had no choices while others claim that the blindness and passivity of the rabbonim was caused by G-d since there was so much that they could have done to save their fellow Jews.

    ReplyDelete
  96. What do they say could have been done?

    ReplyDelete
  97. I agree with you that anti-semitism in European countries was more severe than in the Middle-Eastern countries, and that prior to the holocaust, millions of European Jews were killed by the Christians. Being that both the European Jews and the Middle-Eastern Jews were in Galus, to what do you attribute this difference?

    ReplyDelete
  98. see the words of the Lubavitcher Rebbe which I added. Rav Miller claims to see a precise cause and effect relationship. The other side says we are not prophets and don't know precisely why and how things happened

    ReplyDelete
  99. 10% of the Holocaust victims were frum. We can thus assume that 10% of European Jews were frum. It doesn't make sense if you get all of your history from the CIS holocaust diaries. It does make sense if you know anything about what was going on in Europe before the war. Believe it or don't believe it.

    BTW, I noticed that in one of your later comments on this same topic you also quote something that you "heard many years ago from a reliable source."

    ReplyDelete
  100. At the same time, they blame the Zionists and the Americans for not saving more frum Jews (ie for not bringing them to places which are "worse" than the Gehinnom of Auschwitz)

    ReplyDelete
  101. 2 problems:

    1) this letter is most easily accesed from failedmessiah, yet Hareid extremists always bring it for support, and modern zealots always bring it for attacking (Hareidim).

    2) People have mentioned a lot of Gemaras, but isnt there one which says it is better to live in Eretz Yisroel even if it is fuill of idolaters, rather than to be in Chu'L even with Talmidei chachamim?

    ReplyDelete
  102. There is some validity to this argument. Also, for Jews in germany, who were very much aware of everyday events, it was clearer what was brewing. Kristallnaacht happened a number of years before WW2, and many scientists and bankers fled, and went to UK, USA etc.

    In eastern Europe it might have been harder to assess how things would proceed. I read somewhere that Rav Elchonon was following the steps that Gedolim did in WW1, and they had been saved. The reasoning was that the same steps would work inWW2.

    ReplyDelete
  103. There never was a Sephardi/Mizrachi "reform" movement or Reform shul. In Israel, and elsewhere, all Sephardi shuls are (to my knowledge) Orthodox.
    There is no Sephardi "reform" siddur. there was no Sepahrdi "reform" shulchan aruch. Etc. Not that I am blaming anything on reform.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Rabbi Norman Lamm takes issue with many of these approaches, but it resembles more the Lubavitcher Rebbe's view:
    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0o0UC3MiG0gC&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=emanuel+hartom&source=bl&ots=p_M0YD40BR&sig=8lhwdJAVpXmicIO6M2UcKCYRJI8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlkrSS08XMAhXLJsAKHafyCuwQ6AEIJTAB#v=onepage&q=emanuel%20hartom&f=false

    ReplyDelete
  105. Garnel IronheartMay 6, 2016 at 5:31 PM

    The words of the Rebbe first came to my attention when Rav Shach, z"l, gave a speech in the lat 80's saying that just as a surgeon amputates a diseased part of a body so too God amputated a diseased part of the Jewish body. There was the expected strong reaction along with the Rebbe's speech as excerpted above. Naturally my local Shaliach went around telling everyone "See, the Rebbe disagreed vocally with Rav Shach!" And then someone dug up a sicha from the late 1970's and got a copy to my father because it was in Yiddish and few people around could read it. And guess what it say? Just as a surgeon amputates a diseased part of a body so too God amputated a diseased part of the Jewish body.
    How odd.

    ReplyDelete
  106. If you read through the material - it is used as a metaphor to say that we don't understand what happened. Rav Shach apparently was using it to indicate there was a specific condition that needed correction.

    An alternative explanation is that times have changed and the punishment for sin explanation is not helpful to people's spirituality - at least not those that Lubavitch deals with.

    ReplyDelete
  107. You still haven't cited the exact source of either Rav Miller or anyone else saying that only 10% of the Holocaust victims were frum or that only 10% of European Jews were frum. So far you are the only source of this figure.

    ReplyDelete
  108. The Zionists provocations caused Arab resentment and the British to close the door to European Jewry who were refused Palestine visas by the British.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Where else have you ever saw any chareidi bring this for support? This letter seems hardly too well known and I've never seen it cited elsewhere by any chareidim.

    ReplyDelete
  110. The Zionists also approached many Roshei yeshiva, with visas, and they were insulted and rejected.
    the Zionists also approached many Roshei Yeshiva with visas to other places, eg Japan, and were rejected by rabbonim.
    Some were arrested and put in Cyprus by the British.

    Also, YU provided visas to America, and were rejected by Roshei yeshiva as you have already shown.

    ReplyDelete
  111. The Tosfos Yom Tov did a שאילת חלום. Did anybody do that after WW2?

    ReplyDelete
  112. בענין הטענה האפיקורסית כי בגלל הוראותיהם של גדולי ישראל שלא לעלות לארץ בימי מלחה"ע השניה נהרגו כה רבים מיהודי אירופה

    http://www.yoel-ab.com/katava.asp?id=117

    ReplyDelete
  113. 1. we have a concept of in a "magefa" (plague, however that is defined, but i assume everyone will agree the shoah / holocaust was a magefa) people are jkilled whether or not tghey

    ReplyDelete
  114. "Because that does not fit with the concept of schar ve'onesh, which is one of the 13 Ikkarim."


    its not any of the rambam's 13 ikarrim.

    ReplyDelete
  115. moetzet is a political position. not being on it, is not a sign of godol hador.


    2. RMKahana hy"d funeral also closed down ocean parkway. besides the 13 satelitte trucks, the crowd was tremendous. as was the crowd in yerushalayim. maybe he was a godol hador.

    ReplyDelete
  116. "They were trying to keep Mendel Epstein out of jail"

    they were? news to me. only in terms of chillul hashem.

    now wolmark is different. big $$$ there.

    ReplyDelete
  117. That's my point. Most of them present a secular/traditional behavior, but follow orthodox liturgy and rules without questioning. The rabbi is orthodox but the membership decides which level of religiosity will follow, and everybody is happy this way. It's very interesting to visit their synagogues.

    ReplyDelete
  118. reform is a a strictly american (and german, somewhat british) movement.


    jews all over the world are not exactly shomrei mitzvot, but as a community, they want observance (except for intermarriage, and even there).


    as a general rule (exceptions america and england; germany and russia reform is not succeeding today), you can go into any shul / synagogue anywhere in the world, and there is (some form of) mechitza, (some form of) kashrut, etc,. (maybe not to your and my standards, but a level of same.)


    that would account for lack of sfardi reform. (though i am told there is / was a conservative sfardi temple in xalifornia.)

    ReplyDelete
  119. r dr ephraim zuroff

    ReplyDelete
  120. Roman catholicism (which was way more powerful and excludent than Greek catholicism).

    Each roman catholic council closed more and more the dialogue between christians and other faiths... until the point that europeans were officially educated that whoever was not christian, was sub-human and should convert or be isolated from "normal christian society".

    All other non-christian peoples that inhabited Europe were either eliminated, christianized or treated as garbage.

    In arab lands, on the other hand, people were idol worshipers (did not care at all about jewish or other religions) until aprox. 600 of the common era, when Mohammed founded Islam.

    Since muslim faith is less proselytist than christianity, and its authority is divided in different "perceptions" of Islam, there were a lot of variations in the relationship between them and the jews.

    In "arab lands", when a ruler was against the jews, another ruler protected them, when a city closed its doors, another one opened it, when a group attacked, another one offered them bread... and because of that, jews and muslims developed a (sort of) close relationship. See this thing of the mimuna, for example... muslim neighbors presented the jews with the first hametz as soon as Pessach was finished, and together, they baked, ate, sang and danced the whole night. Such a thing was unthinkable in the christian Europe...

    ReplyDelete
  121. I keep asking you why you think otherwise. You have yet to answer. What do you think it was? 50%? 80? And give a logical explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  122. At the end of Sefer Shmuel 2, we see a magefa came upon Israel for David's sin of counting the people. http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt08b24.htm
    70,000 Israelites perished yet we are not clear exactly why they died and what their sins were (if any). Hashem repented and called off the malach hamavet.
    What this tells us - IMHO - is that int he time we had David Hamelech, and Neviim, and clarity in Ruach Hakodesh, it is still very unclear about why these things happen. How much more so in this period, when we have nothing and are in galut?

    ReplyDelete
  123. So far you are the only source in the world for 10%.

    ReplyDelete
  124. Check this out:

    http://classic.frumteens.com/topic.php?topic_id=105&forum_id=17&topic_title=Rav+Ovadia's+Comment+on+the+Holocaust&forum_title=Punishment&M=0

    ReplyDelete
  125. "There are many reasons that our Tzadikim have given for the holocaust, all basically pointing in the direction of the holocaust being a Divine response to some widespread misconduct on the part of Klall Yisorel as a whole. This is no different than when Chazal attirbuted the deaths, suffering, and destruction of the Bais Hamikdash to various sins that took place at that time. (And no, there were no prophets during the second destruction.)

    Throughout history, whenever calamity befell Klall Yisroel, we held it obligatory to access the cause of the suffering, so that we will know what it is within us that needs improvement, and to make sure we know how never to allow that suffering to return.

    So the Chasid Yaavetz wrote a sefer, Ohr HaChaim, analyzing the causes of the Inquisition.

    Rav Elchonon Wasserman ZTL analyzes the causes of our suffering during the blood libels in Europe.

    Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinsky ZT”L, in the introduction to Achiezer analyses the causes of our suffering during World War I.

    The Satmar Rav ZTL, in the introduction to Vayoel Moshe, analyzes the causes of our suffering during WWII.

    But after all of this, a question remains: Not everyone who died r suffered in any of these tragedies was guilty of whatever crime the sufferings have been attributed to. And although Chazal tell us that whenever punishment is unleashed in the world, innocent people suffer together with the guilty, there is still need for further explanation, as follows:

    Granted that innocent people sometimes suffer, but why? And why specifically these people? If G-d knew that innocent people would suffer, why could the innocent victims not have been born and lived in America or the Middle East, thereby being spared the pain? Surely, in a world controlled by Hashem, it is not random chance that causes some people to suffer for no reason other than they were in the “wrong place at the wrong time?”

    So let’s get the question straight before we answer it. The question is NOT “why were the victims guilty?” but rather “why did they die even though they were innocent?”

    ReplyDelete
  126. "thorughout history, we have aleays sought out the reasons for our sufferings, regardless of whether - and especially in a case where! - the sufferings were horrific.

    The Churban Bayis was attributed to SInas Chinam -- was that "heartless?"

    And what does it mean that its hearltess to identify a "reason" for the suffering of millions of Jews. How many Jewish deaths is it OK to identify reasons for? Nobody in the history of Klall Yisroel ever said that a tragedy was "too big" to identify a reason for it. Why does the amount of people who suffered change the rule of ain misah blo chet? And at what point does it change?

    Had he merely said that he does not know the reason, or he believes that others cannot know, that would be one discussion, but surely he conceds there is a reason - G-d surely does nto hurt people for no reason! - and so why is it "heartless" to be knowledgable enough to know what that reason is? It makes no sense.

    The oppositeis true -- if I suffered c"v, I would want ot know the reason I am suffering so that I should not suffer any more. If I went to a doctor and he told me the reaosn I got sick I would thank him. If a doctor was wise enough to figure out why an epidemic took place, we would be grateful. And the bigger the tragedy c"v, the bigger the hero would be the man who would tell us what made it happen.

    If someone would withold from me the reason I have suffered, him I would call heartless, because he would be witholding the key to prevent it from happening again.

    As the Chavas Daas writes in the introduction to his commentary on Eichah, there is no point whatsoever to recount tragedies unless we at the same time recount the reasons that caused them, in order to ensure that we are careful not to allow them to happen once more.

    And besides --- there were Gedolei Yisroel predicted the holocaust because of the aveiros that were happening. So these reaosns were already known. "

    ReplyDelete
  127. “Was the Holocaust caused by specific sins?”

    I just read, closely, Rabbi Yitz Greenberg on Open Orthodoxy and Rabbi Avraham Gordimer’s most convincing rebuttal on Arutz Sheva http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/18838#.Vy7huDOIrIU

    I agree with Gordimer: “R. Greenberg: PORAT and Progressive (Open) Orthodoxy are not about reviving a tradition within Orthodoxy. They are instead about reforming Orthodoxy …”

    Here’s an example from Greenberg:

    “Its first goal is to make clear that despite the co-opting of Modern Orthodox institutions by those on the right, a significant percentage of the community wants more equality and dignity for women, more inclusive treatment of gay and other minorities, and embraces the whole Jewish people. PORAT is calling for policies that respect and cooperate with the other groupings in Jewry and not to put them down or seek to advance Orthodoxy by exploiting or excluding them.”

    Open Orthodoxy could be worse. There’s no support for adultery with the Greenblatt-Kamenistkys heter and rallies against recalcitrant husbands etc.. Greenberg, as a major supporter of Open Orhodoxy writes mild, e.g: “The continuing second-class status for women, the delegitimization of alternative movements, the exclusion of minorities, the use of monopoly and political force to impose observance on others…”

    ReplyDelete
  128. Also, Yonah did not blame his idol-worshipping shipmates for their tragic situation, he took the blame on himself.

    ReplyDelete
  129. Yitz is the early Open O movement. However, I sat next to him once in shul, and on a personal level he is very frum and observes minute details of halacha.

    ReplyDelete
  130. I've seen it a few times on this blog

    ReplyDelete
  131. The claim that Zionism caused the Holocaust is Satmarist political nonsense, not Torah. I'm not claiming to know the reason for the Holocaust, nor am I apologizing for the sins of the secular Zionists, but if Hashem were punishing the Jews for Zionism, the yishuv in Eretz Yisrael would have been wiped out. In fact the vast majority of the "Zionists" who managed to make aliyah survived WWII and the Israeli wars with the Arabs. While many of the anti-Zionist Chareidim who listened to the anti-Zionist rabbis and remained in Europe were wiped out.

    The Satmarist position also blatantly nullifies the words of the prophet Yoel. "In Jerusalem there shall be a deliverance" (Yoel 3:5)

    ReplyDelete
  132. Ain tzaddik booretz asher yaaseh tov velo yecheto. Even the greatest tzaddikim have sins. However, in general, Hakadosh Boruch Hu runs the world with midas harachamim. However, when permission is given to the destroyer to destroy, he doesn't distinguish between the good and the evil. Which, according to Rabbi Miller, means that sins of the greatest that are normally not immediately punished with full fury, are punished during this time fully. This is in order to maintain bechira so that it shouldn't be obvious that Hashem is fully in control and nothing is random.

    ReplyDelete
  133. Reading Eddie’s comments, I reread Gordimer and Greenberg. I apologize to Rabbi Greenberg.

    “There are two classic cases of Modern Orthodoxy being taken over and transformed into charedi lite. One is the Young Israel movement, which represented the cutting edge of modern Orthodoxy up to the 1950s…The other major case involves Yeshiva University, the flagship institution of Modern Orthodoxy, whose Rosh Yeshiva was the late Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik…”

    I was a student at YU, 1963-167, and a member of Young Israel of Avenue J when I lived in Brooklyn. YU and Young Israel viewed themselves as modern Orthodox and so did I.

    Greenberg writes:

    “While Modern Orthodoxy weakened over the last 50 years, ultra-Orthodoxy found its way and was immensely strengthened in America…One should add to this picture, the enormous organizational success of Lubavitch, …As for the overall charedi growth, one can only appreciate and admire the religious devotion, commitment of lives and hard work that enabled this success…To put it another way: the modern Orthodox cohort had fallen from 14-15 percent of the national Jewish population to 3 percent -- this, at the same time that a number of the main modern institutions had been co-opted to follow policies that favored charedi culture but weakened modern Orthodox viability.”

    I also knew Rabbi Greenberg, as a stimulating Orthodox lecturer at YU, at Friday night or other occasions.

    Greenberg writes well here:

    “What is at stake for the 90 percent – the rest of American Jewry – in this matter? Modern Orthodox professionals have played a key role in the revitalization of American Jewry in the past half-century. This revival is a primary bulwark against looming assimilation. Unless Modern Orthodoxy is reborn, the cohort of leading, community-embracing professionals of Jewish life, including communal affairs, education and spirituality will not be there in the next generation.”

    Greenberg is simply worrying about Modern Orthodoxy dying out. In my view he has much to worry.

    “The time is now to support and invest in a rebirth of Modern Orthodoxy”

    ReplyDelete
  134. What are the lessons for today? We are told there were many nevi'im but only those with messages for future generations were written down as parts of TaNaCh. What do we see in our generation that needs to be learned from the prior generation? Why was there a Final Solution instead of a Final Geulah? What must we do to bring the Final Geulah within OUR generation?

    ReplyDelete
  135. The MO institution may become less influential, but the idea will always be there. And within the Hareidi world, there will be those who veer towards TIDE and eventually a new movement will come out of it.

    OpenO is perhaps a bigger problem, as it is one foot here and one foot there. There used to be a thing called Conservadox - so OO is not really much different.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Please bring a source to the contrary so that I may consider it.

    ReplyDelete
  137. The calamities befall not only for one specific sin. Historically, it is for a whole host of sins and the fate is sealed for when nismale sa'asam along with something more specific. The mabul came because ki hishchis kol bassar, velo nechtam gzar dinam elo al hagezel. Mahapechat sdom vaAmorah came because of Anshei Sdom roim begufom, vechatoim bemomoinom, meod - yodim es ribonom umitkavnim limrod bo. Dor Haflagah, hovoh nivneh lonu ir umigdal - limrod bo. The churban haBayis was because of sinas chinam. By the chet hoEgel there were the three chamurot shebaTorah. Talmidei R' Akiva, shelo nohagu kavod ze bazeh. The tochacha of which it seems happened by the Shoah, was because of as it says Im bechikoisay telechu ve'es mitzvotay tishmoru, referring to all the mitzvot. Intuition tells us that the churban haUmah was caused most likely by the Reform, that destroyed the Foundation of the Jewish Nation of abandoning Torah uMitzvot in wholesale and bridged the hitbolelut losing them forever. The biggest lesson was the nature of how they were singled out, is to remind us that no matter how you behave and imitate the Goyim, in their eyes you are still flagged as a Jude, and were sought out up to three generations carrying Jewish Blood. Abandoning the Torah is the main cause of massive puraniyot all throughout History, and the most common denominator for tipping the scale is Gilui Arayot. What we can learn from all this is, Es Elokim yerei, ve'es mitzvosov shmor, ki ze kol ho'odom. Ve'im lo brisi yomam velayla, chukot Eretz veshomayim lo samti. Veahavta lereacho kamocha, veze kol haTorah kula al regel achas.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Thats interesting because Rav Mendal Zaks had no problem taking a visa from YU.
    And i don't think if he could have got visas from YU for the whole Radun Yeshiva he would have rejected.

    ReplyDelete
  139. Good! let's go with independent thinking...
    How would these guys react if someone said that the Sakono in E"Y is right now far greater then France, because the danger from Iran is imminent and Chaz"al have warned us about the danger in the Gemoro in Kesubos.
    How would they react if someone said to cut it out with the Zionist propaganda and it's time to thing of an alternative to the state??

    ReplyDelete
  140. How would a Rov react today if we were in a Mokom Sakono and JEWS FOR J... were offering to take us under their wings to a place of refuge?

    ReplyDelete
  141. Those that claim that 6 million of our people, including 1.5 million children, were butchered for our sins is ludicrous and disgusting. That is the same reasoning used in the Christian notion of "original sin". Maybe these "rabbis" should convert to Christianity??????

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.