Tuesday, March 1, 2016

R Yitzchok Frankfurter The hatred of Jews towards their fellow Jews on the Internet is comparable to the hatred of the Holocaust

update: Commentary added

The following is an excerpt from an editorial in Ami Magazine  November 11, 2015 praising the Lubavitcher Rebbe and his shluchim and contrasting it to the evils of the Internet

Light Multiplied

 [...] The Rebbe's mission, motivated by love, to search out every Jew after the Holocaust has been contrasted to those darkest day's in our history, when every Jew was searched out in hatred. These days, it might also be compared tס the darkness and loathing that permeate the blogosphere, where people often devour their fellow Jews alive, and all standards of humanity and decency are suspended in order to score a cheap point. 

While lashon hara awareness has increased in the last few decades, largely through the influence of the writings of the Chofetz Chaim, scrupulosity in the observance of these laws has decreased dramatically with the rise of the Internet. In the virtual world, self discipline and impulse control are considered failings, and slandering a fellow Jew a virtue. 

How can we neutralize the darkness that dwells in our computers and defiles our smartphones? The answer is, once again, ahavas Yisrael. As the Alter Rebbe taught, the only way to overcome the yetzer hara's incitement to indulge in slander and defame a fellow Jew is through love. 

"Therefore, my beloved and dear ones, I beg again and again that each of you exert himself with all his heart and soul to firmly implant in his heart a love for his fellow. In the words of [Zechariah 8: 17]: 'Let none of you consider in your heart what is evil for his fellow.' Moreover, [such a consideration} should· never arise in one's heart [in the first place]; and if it does, one should push it away 'as smoke is driven away'-as if it were an actual idolatrous thought. For to speak evil [ of another] is as grave [a sin] as idolatry and incest and bloodshed (Arachin 15b). And if  this be so with speech, [then surely thinking evil about another is even worse], for all the wise of heart are aware of the greater impact [on the soul] of thought over speech" (Tanya, Part 4, Epistle 22). 

The Rebbe's everlasting message, not only for his shluchim but for all of klal Yisrael, is not to fight the darkness overtly, but to make negativity disappear by illuminating the world with rays of light and love. 

Anyone who has ever witnessed a shaliach in action can appreciate the depth and wisdom of this transformation approach. •

================== Commentary by Anonyomous===========

I remember R' Frankfurter's editorial from Ami Magazine's November 11, 2015 issue. I was astounded by his cheap rhetorical tricks; the ridiculous misuse of ‘foil’, something that makes another seem better by contrast, and the egregious use of a particular hyperbolized analogy that would be just cause for the mainstream American Jewish Thought Police, the Marvin Heirs, the Abe Foxmans, etc. to throw him to the dogs. I thought of sending a 'letter to the editor', but I figured that would have the same effect as writing to the White House complaining about the Secretary of State storing Top Secret emails on an unsecured server in her bathroom.

However, in retrospect, I now realize that the editorial was the MSOM's (Mainstream Orthodox Media) opening salvo to protect the Rabbinical Establishment regarding the 'get' fiasco'. TE's so called remarriage occurred on September 24th.  By means of the Blogosphere, the Holy War against this chillul Hashem began and picked up steam during October. Frankfurter’s attack on the Blogosphere was published November, 11. In a moment of desperation and rage, Frankfurter committed what amounts to a capital crime in the eyes of the American Jewish Thought Police; he compared the Blogosphere to the Holocaust. In 2003, Abe Foxman and his ADL went nuclear when PETA equated meat-eating with the Holocaust. Using precious yiddishe gelt, Foxman launched a National campaign against PETA; imagine his reaction to a frumer yid comparing something as trivial as the Blogosphere to the Holocaust! Could be that the Thought Police gave Frankfurter a pass as they are fighting the same enemy and seem to share the same goal, ‘get on demand’. Thus, besides escaping media excoriation, Frankfurter was spared from the penitential tour, a reeducation Holocaust experience at the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles with Rabbi Marvin Heir. At a past fundraising dinner for ‘Tolerance’ Center, Heir honored the Dali Luma (sic), a Buddhist baal avoda zara who operates a center for Jewish youth adjacent to his ashram in India. This Luma, this destroyer of Jewish souls, is perhaps the worst mazik of the generation.

It is ironic that Frankfurter uses the Chabad in general and the Lubavitcher Rebbe, zt’l, in particular, as ‘foils’ in an attempt to highlight the Blogosphere’s evilness. He could not have picked more unsuited ‘foils’. The Rebbe, an engineer by trade, embraced technology, especially communications. In 1960, the New York radio station (WEVD) began broadcasting a weekly Tanya shiur. The Rebbe was the chief editor of the show. The Rebbe was immediately attacked, accused of contaminating the holy words of the Torah. He responded by restating a fundamental principle of Jewish faith: everything was created by G‑d to serve His purpose in creation. Man, who has free choice, might make negative use of a creation, but its intrinsic function remains the revelation of the divine wisdom and goodness.

In 1988, before the Internet was popularized, a Lubavitcher Chassid, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Kazen, began disseminating Chabad Chassidus on Fidonet, an online discussion network. The Rebbe encouraged him in his activities. Several years later, before establishing a Chabad presence on the Internet, Rabbi Kazen asked for the Rebbe’s permission. The Rebbe said to absolutely pursue it. The Internet is an integral part of Chabad. In way-off places, the Shluchim are able to educate their young children via virtual classrooms, and access materials to enhance their kiruv work. Thus, Frankfurter uses the most Internet-friendly and controversial group in Orthodox Judaism in an attempt to posel the Blogosphere in order to protect the Kaminetskys and the Agudah. 

19 comments:

  1. Very interesting, but I don't see the reference to the Holocaust - perhaps i missed it.

    Hate is a bad thing but it is a yetzer hara. However, it is a mitzvah to hate certain people. I am not talking about chas v'shalom frum groups we disagree with. But reshaim, rodefim etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This post is written in code; Lubavitchers always refer to any criticism of their cult as "sin'at hinam" and to praise of their leader and themselves as "ahavat Yisrael". Nothing else interests them at all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. the post was not written by a Lubavicher but is a selection of an editorial by the editor of Ami magazine

    ReplyDelete
  4. it is rather more complicated - by criticising their Orthodox credentials, it is an assault on the entire movement. If you have a debate about other issues, eg nittel, they will not call it sinnas hinnam. Actually, I once questioned another Chosid whow as not Chabad, about Nittel practice, and he mentioned a Gadol who would liek to see the Gehinnom of people who oppose Nittel.
    So the problem is not just Chabad, and it is not always Chabad either.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OK, please remove my comment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. disqus allows you to remove yourself

    ReplyDelete
  7. rde, did you delete all of rap's comments on all the old thread's from the past year or did he do that?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I blacklisted the person who was posting in his name. Haven't checked to see if that impacted his genuine comments

    ReplyDelete
  9. Some Shlichim truly have Ahavas Yisroel and do a great job, while other Shlichim care only about furthering a Lubovitch agenda, there are no two shlichim alike. What I don't get is if Ahavas Yisroel is every Yid's mission then what's the point about discussing that it was a lubovitch agenda?

    ReplyDelete
  10. As long as their shluchim are helping people keep mitzvos, they are to be praised. One of the Misnaged leaders (perhaps Rav Moshe) sent out shlichim to support Lubavitch, the time the Rebbe had his heart attack in the '70s. The legitimate criticism is against the premature Mesianism, and also there have been critiques of halachic problems, eg paskening against sleeping in the Sukkah (which goes against the Torah).

    ReplyDelete
  11. Rav Shach said the same thing about the rebbe and his chasiddim only the top praise. We all pick and choose based on our only Daas - and call that Daas Torah.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What?? Rav Schach praised Chabad? Please cite some evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Both internet bloggers & commenters and Jewish journalists can be good, bad, or ugly. There is no quality control over the internet, and likewise none over today's print and broadcast media. Let the public come to its own, hopefully informed, impressions decisions. If the public is not informed, they need the straight truth and not propaganda for or against the status quo. The time of intimidation is past.

    ReplyDelete
  14. rde, why did you delete the post with rap's message? did you figure out why all his posts from the last year and a half have been deleted from all threads?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I blacklisted the commenter who RaP says is an imposter. Disqus says there were five comments that were deleted. No other comments should have been deleted - unless he deleted them himself.

    If he wants I will remove the blacklist if that has interfered with his genuine comments

    ReplyDelete
  16. it was well known that Rav Shach asked for the Rebbe's mother's name, to pray for him when he was ill. Rav Shach opposed the messianic direction of the Chabad movement.

    ReplyDelete
  17. what's the point about discussing that it was a lubovitch agenda?

    1) Sales
    2) To shield himself from rightful criticism. If you take issue with Mr. Frankfurter, then you are a "hating, anti-chabad, bla bla".

    ReplyDelete
  18. Aha I get it, makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  19. He did not it was sarcasm, rav shach had no love loss for the rebbe and the meshugaim that follow him.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.