Wednesday, December 14, 2022

With no evidence, The Times claimed that hundreds of ‘male-bodied sex offenders were classified as women’ in recent years

 https://www.thepinknews.com/2022/01/07/the-times-corrections-trans-misinformation-rape-chestfeeding/

In the story, Massie claimed: “We pretend that women can — and do — commit rape… In England and Wales 436 male-bodied sex offenders were classified as women from 2012 to 2018.”

In the correction, The Times said: “In fact, under English law, accessories to a crime are charged as principal offenders, and therefore women can be charged with rape.

“How many female defendants were ‘male-bodied’ is not recorded. We are happy to make this clear.”

Following the correction, The Times has now re-published the piece, removing the explicit claim that all recorded female sex offenders are trans.

However, at the time this article was published, it continued to claim that “436 rape defendants were classified as women”.

22 comments :

  1. So now your source of emes is Pink news?

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-without-exemptions-to-protect-women-in-prison-gender-identity-laws-are-unconstitutional

    Sure, sure, no women are being raped by trans-rapists, the Hunter-Biden laptop wasn't even a laptop and Chernobyl was an isolated incident that endangered nobody.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you claiming without sources that you always no best because you rely on unfounded rumors?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just that you have some elasticity when it comes to finding reliable sources

    ReplyDelete
  5. You mean they disagree with your authoritative rumors?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Probably most of your readers are repulsed by your Pink source

    ReplyDelete
  7. And Jews are not really a danger to Mankind
    What other claims do you want to make with only conspiracy theories and no evidence?

    ReplyDelete
  8. of course your made-up claim must be more accurate since you don't care about facts

    ReplyDelete
  9. And you aren't elastic because you make up claims without evidence

    ReplyDelete
  10. repulse by the source or that it refutes your claim?

    ReplyDelete
  11. You dismissed the article I posted

    ReplyDelete
  12. So anything LGBT is authority, simply because it has a gay hechsher?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nope!
    But a gay citation of facts is more believable than someone repeating unfounded rumors or making up claims

    ReplyDelete
  14. Um, everything I cited has evidence, especially the laptop (which you've been reduced to defending with "Nyah, nyah, no it's not!") and Chernobyl.

    ReplyDelete
  15. When you don't have real new sources you take what you can get.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's the usual. My crappy news source is worthy because I agree with you. Your similarly crappy new source isn't because I don't

    ReplyDelete
  17. That must be why it is in the top 10 of posts read this week

    ReplyDelete
  18. Except when the British chief rabbi got some advice from feiglach, he was placed in virtual cherem.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Lol , what a convincing argument.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Gay ben-hinnom

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.