https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/05/04/jerry-nadler-antisemitism-bill-00156105
Well, there are three extant definitions. One is by IHRA. One is the Nexus definition and the other is the Jerusalem definition. They’re all equally valid. They all give different examples for perceptions of antisemitism, and none of them should be enshrined into law. The chief author of the IHRA definition, Kenneth Stern, said don’t codify this. Don’t make it part of any law because these are examples that may indicate antisemitism but don’t necessarily in every case, and to enshrine it into law — he thought and a lot of other people think — would be destructive of free speech. It could make criticism, under certain circumstances, of Israeli government policy antisemitic, which it clearly isn’t.
Nope! https://www.jns.org/the-house-bill-will-hinder-campus-antisemitism-not-free-speech/
ReplyDeletejust repeating your claim doesn't make it true
DeleteIf repeating claims made them true then you'd be right about Trump being Hitler.
DeleteTrump was accused of using similar language
DeleteSource for your claims he was accused of being Hitler
Trump is the one claiming Biden administration is Gestapo