While Biden fumbled some details in his interview, the full transcript could raise questions about Hur’s depiction of the 81-year-old president as having “significant limitations” on his memory. It paints a more textured picture of his discussions with prosecutors, filling out some of the gaps left by Hur’s accounting of the exchanges.
Kind of reminds one of the last days of Mao Zedong when he was clearly demented and nonfunctional but kept getting wheeled out for public engagements and everyone screamed "How dare you question his health and mental capacity?!"
ReplyDelete(Come to think of that, they did that with a recently departed Chareidi 'Gadol' too)
Wow proof by alleged similarity!
DeleteHowever your assertion is more right wing wishful nonsense@
The efforts around Biden are growing more pathetic.
DeleteHe fumbled some details? nothing to see here! He had significant memory lapses on a previous report? Well today he remembered what he had breakfast so there!
Your efforts are getting more pathetic - what happened to your video evidence you claimed to have?
Deletehttps://dusiznies.blogspot.com/2024/03/yesterdays-hearing-in-congress-shows.html
DeleteWhat is this aside from the partisan interpretation. What has this to do with the AP article which was evaluated the transcript?
Deletehttps://daattorah.blogspot.com/2024/03/trump-did-not-sign-order-to-deploy.html#comment-form
DeleteYou claimed ther was video evidence which contradicted the above article - where is it?
An interpretation of another person's testimony is not normally viewed as proof but is mere conjecture.