Sunday, October 3, 2021

How the War on Terror Gave Us Trump

 https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/spencer-ackerman-trump-9-11-reign-of-terror-1222963/

 Trump would tolerate no more nonsense about a “war of ideas.” Brutality would be defeated by greater brutality. The euphemism of the War on Terror had been an attempt to conceal such disreputable behavior, but Trump brought it unapologetically into the open. He lied that “thousands and thousands” of Muslims in Jersey City had cheered the fall of the Twin Towers. As vengeance, Trump would “bomb the shit out of ISIS” and stop fighting “a politically correct war,” by which he meant one that distinguished between guerrillas and civilians. “You have to take out their families,” he told Fox. Torture “absolutely” works, Trump asserted, showing faith in the CIA’s 15-year-old narrative. He pledged to bring back “a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding” and stock Guantanamo Bay full of “bad dudes.” ISIS’s assault on Paris meant there was “no choice” but to close mosques within the United States. Before 2015 had ended, Trump delivered his ultimate response to ISIS: calling for a ban on all Muslim immigration. “We can’t take a chance,” he said, denying that ISIS fighters were meaningfully distinct from the Muslim civilians they raped, terrorized, and turned into refugees. It was Cheney’s one-percent doctrine applied civilizationally. Stephen Miller was so excited by these promises that the following month he joined Trump’s campaign. His old boss, Jeff Sessions, the first senator to endorse Trump, helmed the candidate’s foreign policy and national security working group.

2 comments:

  1. Good, need more people who can think correctly

    ReplyDelete
  2. How many lies can you pile into one paragraph?
    Brutality does work. The US didn't overthrow the Taliban in 2001 by sending them flowers and chocolate and they lost to the Taliban when they switched to that tactic. Ariel Sharon became one of the Israel's greatest generals ever when he made the Arabs realize that any attack on Jews would result in an even bigger attack on them, and it worked. And he didn't ban all Muslim immigration - just from specific countries. His argument was also a good one - someone hands you a bowl with 100 identical candies except one is poison. Would you eat from that bowl?

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.