“Trump's ex-colleagues open up about his history of lies” Gives me an idea, to open up about the history of Susan’s lies, my letter today:
3.Clearly Elizabeth Popkin, Judge Rigler, Larry Rothbart, Judge Ambrosio, and Susan knew very well that I divorced Susan 2/17/1993 in an Israeli Rabbinic Court with Susan plaintiff and Rabbi Aryeh Ralbag a principal. .Exhibit A: Susan's Exhibit E in her January 2017 papers contains lies. It is a lie: “to amend his answer to add as an additional affirmative defense that the issues in the separation action had been conclusively determined in a divorce degree issued by a Rabbinical Court of the State of Israel.” An additional affirmative defense =: This is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven that the defendant committed the alleged acts. No. On July 22, 1994 Judge Rigler knew well I divorced Susan February 17, 1993. It's a lie to say Aranoff v. Aranoff 226 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996) 642 N.Y.S.2d 49 decided Apr 29, 1996 that I wanted to amend my answer to add as an additional affirmative defense. The Court does not know what I wanted to include in my amended answer. Susan was paying bribes to Judge Rigler, Judge Ambrosio, and Larry Rothbart. Susan incurred $25,000 legal expenses on her own statement while she had Popkin her lawyer. Supposedly Myla Serlin was Susan's replacement lawyer March 7, 1995 on the fake/phony Rigler Order of Separation Myla handed to Judge Prus August 1, 2013.
4.I never asked the Court to recognize the Israeli divorce. I dare Susan to find a court document that I asked the Court to recognize the Israeli divorce. I offered in 1993 to pay Susan half of the $750 monthly TIAA pension I was receiving in Israel with Yemima as beneficiary for child support. Susan's decision early 1994 was to refuse my offer. Susan was projecting that she was an agunah. Susan had millions. She didn't need half of my TIAA pension.
5.Lie: “an order of the same court, dated August 29, 1994, as denied his motion to vacate a prior pendente lite order of the same court dated February 1, 1994, which, inter alia had enjoined the transfer of his pension.” No. Never was a hint or a possibility of transfer of the TIAA pension. Susan got Rigler and Rothbart to freeze 100% my TIAA pension which stayed frozen.
6.Lie: “In July 1991, the wife commenced this separation action after the husband had left the United States to settle permanently in the State of Israel.” Susan commenced her separation action while I was still in Brooklyn 498 East 18 Street sleeping in the same bed together. I apply to Susan (Proverbs 3:29-30): “Do not devise harm against your fellow Who lives trustfully with you. Do not quarrel with a man for no cause, When he has done you no harm.”
WHAT ABOUT THE IMPLICIT AND SO WIDESPREAD LIES OF THE DEMOCRATS THAT IT SEEMS ONLY THOSE WHO FEAR G-D EVEN THINK TO QUESTION THEM ANYMORE?!?!
ReplyDeleteMen can marry men.
Women can marry women.
A boy can become a girl.
A girl can become a boy.
A woman's body is her own. Trash that baby. Wrap it up! I'll take it to go.
“Trump's ex-colleagues open up about his history of lies” Gives me an idea, to open up about the history of Susan’s lies, my letter today:
ReplyDelete3.Clearly Elizabeth Popkin, Judge Rigler, Larry Rothbart, Judge Ambrosio, and Susan knew very well that I divorced Susan 2/17/1993 in an Israeli Rabbinic Court with Susan plaintiff and Rabbi Aryeh Ralbag a principal. .Exhibit A: Susan's Exhibit E in her January 2017 papers contains lies. It is a lie: “to amend his answer to add as an additional affirmative defense that the issues in the separation action had been conclusively determined in a divorce degree issued by a Rabbinical Court of the State of Israel.” An additional affirmative defense =: This is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven that the defendant committed the alleged acts. No. On July 22, 1994 Judge Rigler knew well I divorced Susan February 17, 1993. It's a lie to say Aranoff v. Aranoff 226 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996) 642 N.Y.S.2d 49 decided Apr 29, 1996 that I wanted to amend my answer to add as an additional affirmative defense. The Court does not know what I wanted to include in my amended answer. Susan was paying bribes to Judge Rigler, Judge Ambrosio, and Larry Rothbart. Susan incurred $25,000 legal expenses on her own statement while she had Popkin her lawyer. Supposedly Myla Serlin was Susan's replacement lawyer March 7, 1995 on the fake/phony Rigler Order of Separation Myla handed to Judge Prus August 1, 2013.
4.I never asked the Court to recognize the Israeli divorce. I dare Susan to find a court document that I asked the Court to recognize the Israeli divorce. I offered in 1993 to pay Susan half of the $750 monthly TIAA pension I was receiving in Israel with Yemima as beneficiary for child support. Susan's decision early 1994 was to refuse my offer. Susan was projecting that she was an agunah. Susan had millions. She didn't need half of my TIAA pension.
5.Lie: “an order of the same court, dated August 29, 1994, as denied his motion to vacate a prior pendente lite order of the same court dated February 1, 1994, which, inter alia had enjoined the transfer of his pension.” No. Never was a hint or a possibility of transfer of the TIAA pension. Susan got Rigler and Rothbart to freeze 100% my TIAA pension which stayed frozen.
6.Lie: “In July 1991, the wife commenced this separation action after the husband had left the United States to settle permanently in the State of Israel.” Susan commenced her separation action while I was still in Brooklyn 498 East 18 Street sleeping in the same bed together. I apply to Susan (Proverbs 3:29-30): “Do not devise harm against your fellow Who lives trustfully with you. Do not quarrel with a man for no cause, When he has done you no harm.”