Friday, July 3, 2020

remarriage without Get - Rav Sternbuch


4 comments:

  1. House of the Rising Sun
    Joan Baez
    There is a house in New Orleans
    They call the Rising Sun
    And it's been the ruin of many a poor girl
    And me, oh God, I'm a-one
    If I had listened to what my mother said
    I'd have been at home today
    But I was young and foolish, oh, God
    Let a rambler lead me astray
    Go tell my baby sister
    Don't do what I have done
    But shun the house in…

    Joan Baez, as it were, sings how bad she did to join a whore house. This whore house has been the ruin of many a poor girl. Joan Baez was one. She was poor and the money looked so good working at the whore house. Joan Baez is so sorry that she didn’t listen to her mother who told her not to go to whore house. Girls work there and get easy money. If only Joan Baez had listened to her mother, Joan Baez would be home today. Alas. Joan Baez has bastard children to raise and to watch over so she can’t go home anymore. Joan Baez tells people to tell Joan’s baby sister not to go to the whore house, but to shun that house. Joan Baez warns girls everywhere to shun a whore house. Beautiful song. I love it.

    We can make a song for Tamar not to go to ORA and not to go to Agunah International and not to get a K-G garbage heter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another beautiful song I love:
    Elvis Presley jokes that she can do anything she wants and she’ll get away with it.

    Blue Suede Shoes
    Elvis Presley, Elvis Presley
    Well, it's a-one for the money
    Two for the show
    Three to get ready now go, cat, go
    But don't you
    Step on my blue suede shoes
    Well you can do anything
    But lay off o' my blue suede shoes
    Well you can knock me down
    Step in my face
    Slander my name all over the place
    Well do anything that you wanna do
    But uh-uh honey, lay off o' them shoes
    And don't you
    Step on my blue suede shoes
    Well you can do anything
    But lay off o' my blue suede shoes
    Let's go, cats!
    Oh, walk the dog!
    Well you can burn my house
    Steal my car
    Drink my liquor from an old fruit jar
    Well do anything that you wanna do
    But uh-uh honey, lay off o' my shoes
    And don't you
    Step on my blue suede shoes
    Well you can do anything
    But lay off o' my blue suede shoes
    Rock it!
    Well it's a-one for the money
    Two for the…

    ReplyDelete
  3. “remarriage without Get - Rav Sternbuch” No. We must all come out 100% with Rabbi Sternbuch:

    וראיתי התשובה להתיר ובמחכ"ת [ובמחילת כבוד תורה] הם דברי הבל, ובדרך זו יכולים לקלקל כל דיני אישות בישראל

    See
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/283004

    “What goes for Trump goes for Netanyahu 10 times over. What Netanyahu does over the next few weeks will determine if he goes down in history as one of the greatest Jewish leaders of all time, or is remembered as a disappointment of Sabbatean proportions. Since he was first elected prime minister in 1996, Netanyahu has faced two main challenges: Preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and securing Israel’s rights and interests in Judea and Samaria in the face of Palestinian rejectionism and terrorism and in the midst of phony peace process supported by the foreign policy establishment, the Israeli left, and the international left. After 24 years, both of these issues have reached a moment of truth. Setting aside the issue of the mysterious explosions in areas in and around Iran’s nuclear installations, Netanyahu’s primary task diplomatically is to clear a path for Trump to enact the snap-back sanctions just as he cleared the path for Trump to exit the nuclear deal in 2018. As for the Palestinians, in 1996, Netanyahu was elected prime minister because he was the leader of the opposition to the phony Oslo peace process with the PLO. As Netanyahu and his supporters warned, the Oslo process was a strategic mistake. In due course, it failed and it caused Israel unspeakable damage. More than 1,500 Israelis were killed because of the terrorist whirlwind Oslo reaped and Israel’s international standing dropped to new lows.”

    Tamar, wife of Aaron Friedman, did a phony “Tamar is free” campaign based on a phony PhD psychology letter. Rabbi Sternbuch saw through the game Tamar was playing.
    The Oslow process with Yossi Belin etc was a phony peace process. They brought Arafat from Tunisia...
    Susan did a phony “he abandoned me” campaign started July 1991 before I made aliya. TIAA started paying me my pension 1993, $750 monthly. Susan got court orders to take 55% of my TIAA pension from early 1994 with no end in sight. How? Based on a phony court process. Maybe NYS Court of Appeals Mo. No. 2020-352 June 29, 2020 will get to the bottom.
    I see similarities in phony peace process in Israel, phony PhD psychology letter, and phony Susan court papers in Aranoff v Aranoff.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I read closely Rabbi Sternbuch:
    בדבר מה שנתפרסם כאן פסק של אחד מגדולי ראשי הישיבות באמריקה עם אחד מהפוסקים שם שהתיר רח"ל [רחמנא לצלן] בלא גט אשה שכבר חיה יחד עם בעלה תקופה. וכבר יש לה ילד [ילדה] ממנו, ועכשיו לדעת הרופא [עם תעודה פסיכולוג] הוא [בעל האישה אהרון פרידמן] הוא סובל ממחלות נפש שהייתה כבר קודם, והם [K-G] פסקו שנתברר שהוא שזהו מקח טעות ויכולה להינשא מיד, וסידרו לה חופה וקידושין בלא גט.
    וראיתי התשובה להתיר ובמחכ"ת [ובמחילת כבוד תורתו] הם דברי הבל, ובדרך זו יכולים לקלקל כל דיני אישות בישראל.
    Amazing that the supporters of “Tamar is free” are able to divert attention and never address the fake/phony PhD psychology letter. Bad. Why? It’s a felony crime to submit a fake/phony document though committed years ago. Looking at now. Tamar can never go home to her husband after the so-called marrying her lover. Should we all just leave Tamar alone? What business do we have to complain? We do have business to complain, because others will do as Tamar did: produce a fake/phony psychology letter.
    Applying this to Mo. No. 2020=352 June 29, 2020. Who cares about crimes the late Judge Garson did and others did in Aranoff v Aranoff so long ago? The courts don’t want to investigate if any crimes were committed. The courts see that as the job of police who are so over worked and racists and not the job of courts.
    OK, I tell myself to drop the issue that Aranoff v Aranoff was opened July 1991 based on a lie “he abandoned me.” I say let Mo. No. 2020=352 June 29, 2020 look only at TIAA paying 55% of my pension to Susan from early 1994 with no end in sight. I have to tell the court that I’m willing that the court examine only the issue of continuing the payments from my pension to Susan.
    Why should I fight to block what other angry wives in NYS may do to their husbands in court papers? I should let Susan alone. OK I agree, just give me my pension from August 1, 2020---OK? You people support my fight, yes? I think Rabbi Sternbuch would take my side in Mo. No. 2020-352 June 29, 2020. False documents and false complaints are crimes. Tamar submitted false documents and made false complaints to get her garbage K-G heter.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.