“1.I request permission to submit these papers concerning my motion return date 6/1/2020. I'm attaching an affidavit of service proving I mailed by UPS a true copy to Susan and to TIAA. I attach Exhibit A: Decision of the Jerusalem Bet Din January 21, 1993.
2.Domestic Relations Law 253 Removal of barriers to remarriage states: 1.This section applies only to a marriage solemnized in this state or in any other jurisdiction by a person specified in subdivision one of section eleven of this chapter.\\ 2.Any party to a marriage defined in subdivision one of this section who commences a proceeding to annul the marriage or for a divorce must allege, in his or her verified complaint: (i) that, to the best of his or her knowledge, that he or she has taken or that he or she will take, prior to the entry of final judgment, all steps solely within his or her power to remove any barrier to the defendant’s remarriage following the annulment or divorce; or (ii) that the defendant has waived in writing the requirements of this subdivision.
3.Under Jewish and NYS law a married man is responsible for his wife's needs. She certainly can petition a rabbinic or secular court to enforce him to pay child care. In NYS the custom is that wife suing for child support usually commences a proceeding to annual the marriage or a proceeding for a divorce. The NYS Court of Appeals needs to clarify the law when the wife receives the get in a NYS rabbinic court before witnesses. Does she still have standing in a proceeding to annual the marriage or a proceeding for a divorce? Surely not! Why? She needs to commence a new law suit to recover money or assets she feels due her. In this new lawsuit she becomes simply a party with a money claim to another, her former husband. This will reduce court cases of a proceeding to annual the marriage or a proceeding for a divorce.
4.A man sending a get to his wife is a legal predicator, defined as: Predicator = In a legal sense, the term predicate means to base something, such as a fact, statement, or action, on another thing. For instance, a person may agree to give a crate of baseball bats to the local little league, predicated on (or based on) a parent's withdrawal of a lawsuit.
5.Exhibit A Decision of the Jerusalem Bet Din January 21, 1993 shows the understanding I was under at the Jerusalem rabbinic court: This is the decision of the Court on date 28 Tevet 5753 (January 21, 1993) that the husband is willing to accept divorce by his agreeing to the division of the dwelling immediately that he gets 45% and the wife gets 55%. In exchange for her agreement to arrange divorce, likewise, regarding child support, that the husband claims that written on the names of their children are 2 million dollars in the bank, therefore, he shall not pay child support. And that the dwelling will be sold immediately, actually, your honor has already sent us the name of the wife to arrange the divorce and the name of the second agent in his letter that was sent by fax on date 8 Adar first 5752 (February 12, 1992). Please summons the wife at your earliest convenience to notify us regarding her agreement to arrange divorce.
6.Did Susan agree to sell the house immediately and to take 55% and to forego all claims for child support? Susan may want to say that she wanted the get so badly she only pretended to agree. I agree now that Susan could keep the whole house and the whole 55\% of my pension from early 1994 until June 1, 2020. I'll stop legal actions if I can get my pension from here on. Oh, I would like the Court to cancel the $25,000 punitive sanctions Judges Rigler and Garson gave me, so I could travel freely to America.”
Allow me to show here my letter today:
ReplyDelete“1.I request permission to submit these papers concerning my motion return date 6/1/2020. I'm attaching an affidavit of service proving I mailed by UPS a true copy to Susan and to TIAA. I attach Exhibit A: Decision of the Jerusalem Bet Din January 21, 1993.
2.Domestic Relations Law 253 Removal of barriers to remarriage states:
1.This section applies only to a marriage solemnized in this state or in any other jurisdiction by a person specified in subdivision one of section eleven of this chapter.\\
2.Any party to a marriage defined in subdivision one of this section who commences a proceeding to annul the marriage or for a divorce must allege, in his or her verified complaint: (i) that, to the best of his or her knowledge, that he or she has taken or that he or she will take, prior to the entry of final judgment, all steps solely within his or her power to remove any barrier to the defendant’s remarriage following the annulment or divorce; or (ii) that the defendant has waived in writing the requirements of this subdivision.
3.Under Jewish and NYS law a married man is responsible for his wife's needs. She certainly can petition a rabbinic or secular court to enforce him to pay child care. In NYS the custom is that wife suing for child support usually commences a proceeding to annual the marriage or a proceeding for a divorce. The NYS Court of Appeals needs to clarify the law when the wife receives the get in a NYS rabbinic court before witnesses. Does she still have standing in a proceeding to annual the marriage or a proceeding for a divorce? Surely not! Why? She needs to commence a new law suit to recover money or assets she feels due her. In this new lawsuit she becomes simply a party with a money claim to another, her former husband. This will reduce court cases of a proceeding to annual the marriage or a proceeding for a divorce.
4.A man sending a get to his wife is a legal predicator, defined as: Predicator = In a legal sense, the term predicate means to base something, such as a fact, statement, or action, on another thing. For instance, a person may agree to give a crate of baseball bats to the local little league, predicated on (or based on) a parent's withdrawal of a lawsuit.
5.Exhibit A Decision of the Jerusalem Bet Din January 21, 1993 shows the understanding I was under at the Jerusalem rabbinic court: This is the decision of the Court on date 28 Tevet 5753 (January 21, 1993) that the husband is willing to accept divorce by his agreeing to the division of the dwelling immediately that he gets 45% and the wife gets 55%. In exchange for her agreement to arrange divorce, likewise, regarding child support, that the husband claims that written on the names of their children are 2 million dollars in the bank, therefore, he shall not pay child support. And that the dwelling will be sold immediately, actually, your honor has already sent us the name of the wife to arrange the divorce and the name of the second agent in his letter that was sent by fax on date 8 Adar first 5752 (February 12, 1992). Please summons the wife at your earliest convenience to notify us regarding her agreement to arrange divorce.
6.Did Susan agree to sell the house immediately and to take 55% and to forego all claims for child support? Susan may want to say that she wanted the get so badly she only pretended to agree. I agree now that Susan could keep the whole house and the whole 55\% of my pension from early 1994 until June 1, 2020. I'll stop legal actions if I can get my pension from here on. Oh, I would like the Court to cancel the $25,000 punitive sanctions Judges Rigler and Garson gave me, so I could travel freely to America.”