https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-responds-james-comey-fbi-memos_n_5d67e1f0e4b022fbceb797ac
President Donald Trump on Thursday welcomed parts of a report by the Justice Department’s inspector general that concluded former FBI Director James Comey had violated FBI policies in his handling of certain memos regarding his interactions with the president.
While ignoring parts of the report that refute his own repeated claims, Trump said the IG’s findings leave Comey “thoroughly disgraced and excoriated”:
Ok. So it wasn't classified. Minor detail. Bottom line: The FBI Director messed up BIG time.
ReplyDeletehe did not pass classified material as Trump lied again
ReplyDeleteDaas Torah says “he did not pass classified material as Trump lied again”
ReplyDeleteYes, to leak classified material is a crime/felony. Tough to prove a crime. Mendel Epstein et al did their crimes for so many years, before proof brought before a court. Gerald Garson, who sat in jail 4 years for bribery did his crimes for years before proof brought before a court. In SCOTUS 18-9390 I’m trying to prove forgery, a crime/felony. Tough to prove a crime. I belong in Guiness Book of Records, if SCOTUS grants 18-9390, me, not a lawyer and in Israel. My only expenses are UPS charges, reasonable.
See https://www.wsj.com/articles/jim-comeys-higher-virtue-11567121926
“These violations may not be crimes, and the Justice Department declined to prosecute after referral by the IG. But they are unacceptable in someone who had Mr. Comey’s authority and has made his career assailing others for lesser offenses. They show again why Mr. Trump was right to fire him. Yet true to form, Mr. Comey took to Twitter Thursday to suggest his critics owe him an apology, because the IG didn’t find he had released the classified information contained in his memos to the media. Mr. Comey is lucky the judicious Bill Barr is Attorney General rather than a righteous Jim Comey. This was only the first IG report, and we’ll learn more when he reports soon on Mr. Comey’s role in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants taken out on a former Trump campaign adviser.”
My only hope of getting back my pension, is if NYS COA 649 or SCOTUS 18-9390 grants my motion---unless Susan tells the pension company that I don’t owe her any money. I always said (and wrote to the court) if I can get my pension from here on, I’ll stop all my complaining.
I say in SCOTUS 18-9390: “Leviticus 19:15 states "You shall not render an unfair decision: do not favor the poor or show deference to the rich; judge your kinsman fairly." ... The trial and jail sentence of the late Judge Gerald Garson was just the tip of the iceberg of fraud etc in NYS civil courts. The Court granting me my petition will help root out fraud etc in NYS civil courts.”
It could be that SCOTUS 18-9390 and NYS COA 649 both may concluded that the business of the (fake/phony) 1995 Rigler Order of Separation is not crime and all my litigation is frivolous. We’ll see.
Daf hayomi just now, a novelty to me: I didn’t know, allow me:
ReplyDeleteK’rithoth 8b:
“Now are not the leprous man and the leprous woman also different with regard to their uncleanness? For the leprous man is required to rend his clothes and to let his hair grow loose, as it is written: “the man is leprous; he is unclean. The priest shall pronounce him unclean; he has the affection on his head. the man is leprous; he is unclean. The priest shall pronounce him unclean; he has the affection on his head. As for the person with a leprous affection, his clothes shall be rent פרומים, his head shall be left bare פרוע, and he shall cover יעטה over his upper lip; and he shall call out, “Unclean! Unclean!” He shall be unclean as long as the disease is on him. Being unclean, he shall dwell apart; his dwelling shall be outside the camp.” (Leviticus 13:44-46) His clothes shall be rent and the hair of his head shall go loose, and he is forbidden marital intercourse; while the leprous woman is not required to rend her clothes and to let her hair grow loose, as it has been taught: I know only the law concerning a man, whence do I know its application to a woman? When the text reads, and the leper והצרוע, both are included. Wherefore then is man mentioned? The Writ removed him from the [application of the] earlier passage to the latter one, to teach us that only a man is required to rend his clothes and to let his hair grow loose, but not a woman. Also the woman is permitted marital intercourse, as it is written: And he shall dwell outside his tent seven days [“The one to be cleansed shall wash his clothes, shave off all his hair, and bathe in water; then he shall be clean. After that he may enter the camp, but he must remain outside his tent seven days” (Leviticus 14:8). Tent is a symbolic expression of matrimonial life], but not [she] outside her tent.”
Wow this is modified feminism דאורייתא. It surely would be excessively cruel to make a woman stricken with צרעת to under the sanctions of tearing her clothes, letting her hair go, and no sex. Beautiful.
“Feminism is a range of social movements, political movements, and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes.” See, the Torah does not treat the sexes the same!
Not necessarily. There was no evidence he passed classified information.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't yet officially evaluated. But everyone knew it's classified
ReplyDeletetrumps justice department disagrees with your beliefs about what is criminal
ReplyDeleteDaas Torah "trumps justice department disagrees with your beliefs about what is criminal”
ReplyDeleteYes, the Department of Justice appears to reject what I said: “Yes, to leak classified material is a crime/felony. Tough to prove.”
The issue in my COA NYS 649 and SCOTUS 18-9390:
“Questions Presented Can NYS Kings County Supreme Court Judge Eric I. Prus block me from seeing a critical document? Can Susan's lawyer, Myla Serlin, block me from seeing a critical document? The critical document is the 1995 Rigler Order of Separation used to justify the 2013 NYS civil divorce Gerald v. Susan despite the Israel divorce 1993.”
Yes, Trump’s friend William Barr may not charge tricky leaky Comey with a crime concerning the memo (s?) he gave to his Columbia U. friend. I support Trump, Netanyahu and William Barr 100%.. Chodesh tov. I heard the shofar today. I pray:
Talmud - Mas. Berachoth 17a
“Mar the son of Rabina on concluding his prayer added the following: My God, keep my tongue from evil and my lips from speaking guile. May my soul be silent to them that curse me and may my soul be as the dust to all. Open Thou my heart in Thy law, and may my soul pursue Thy commandments, and deliver me from evil hap, from the evil impulse and from an evil woman and from all evils that threaten to come upon the world. As for all that design evil against me, speedily annul their counsel and frustrate their designs! “May the words of my mouth and the prayer of my heart והגיון לבי be acceptable to You, O Lord, my rock and my redeemer.”(Psalms 19:15)”
except for department of justice
ReplyDelete