Ad hominum arguments – that is how rav Shmuel is being defended. INSTEAD OF DEFENDING HIS POSITION SUPORTING ADULTERY. EFFORT IS WASTED CLAIMING I AM IMMORAL
SAM WHAM WROTE:
I'M JUST WONDERING WHY YOU LIKE TALKING ABOUT RAPE ALL. DAY.
IT IS STRANGE YOU CANT NOTICE THE OTHER THINGS I WRITE ABOUT LIKE R KAMINETSKY
Rabbi Eidensohn: Bravo! Spoken as a true psychologist, scholar and gentleman: “Ad hominum arguments – that is how rav Shmuel is being defended.”
ReplyDeleteinternet: “Ad Hominem (Abusive) argumentum ad hominem (also known as: personal abuse, personal attacks, abusive fallacy, damning the source, name calling, refutation by caricature, against the person, against the man)…
Description: Attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself, when the attack on the person is completely irrelevant to the argument the person is making…
[Example:]
Tony wants us to believe that the origin of life was an “accident”. Tony is a godless SOB who has spent more time in jail than in church, so the only information we should consider from him is the best way to make license plates.
Explanation: Tony may be a godless SOB. Perhaps he did spend more time in the joint than in church, but all this is irrelevant to his argument or truth of his claim as to the origin of life…
Tip: When others verbally attack you, take it as a compliment to the quality of your argument. It is usually a sign of desperation on their part.
Oh, Susan does that all the time to me in court, e.g.
Susan's 1/4/2015 notarized papers to NYS Court of Appeals:
5.What gall Mr. Aranoff has to challenge me to provide him with documents when he torments me non-stop with repetitive and frivolous motions to the point of harming my health. I am not obligated to provide such a service for him…Mr. Aranoff must stop his bizarre assertion that Judge Rigler's Judgement of Separation which was produced In Judge Prus' court and duly noted in the record, doesn't exist.
8.Mr. Aranoff once again libelously smears the Hon.\ Judges Rigler and Prus and Mr. Rothbart with baseless accusations and scurrilous quotes from some anonymous, incoherent internet posting. Shame on Mr. Aranoff for smearing people that way and showing such contempt for judges and personnel of the NYS courts
The messenger Sam wham is right. You are obsessed with דברי נבלה. And your whole defence is that whoever writes against you is is for something else is so perverted that there is nothing to say. It simply shows how narcissistic you are.
ReplyDeleteMy comment had nothing to do with the kaminetsky story.
ReplyDeleteStill waiting for your list of the many rabbis who support Reb Shmuel
ReplyDeleteAgain you can't defend yourself so you attack the messenger.
ReplyDeleteYou made a false claim a out the many ra nis eho suport r shmuel i a m sauing you are aliar or ignoant so far you have not named a single rabbi!
ReplyDeleteRIGHT!!!!! AND CHILD ABUSE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RAPE!SO YOU WANT CHILD ABUSE DEALT WITH IN A NICER MANNER!!!
ReplyDeleteAll you take about all day is rape. Abuse. Molestation.
ReplyDeleteMove on.
Nivul peh is your whole life.
Tell me of one rabbi who says that what your doing is OK.
Complain to Rav Sternbuchbhe encouraged me
ReplyDeleteTo do what exactly?
ReplyDeleteSoftware is like sex: it’s better when it’s free. Hey, i am looking for an online sex partner ;) Click on my boobs if you are interested (. )( .)
ReplyDelete