Thursday, March 2, 2017

Justice Department confirms that Attorney General Sessions lied about not meeting with the Russians during the campaign


Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) spoke twice last year with Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Justice Department officials said, encounters he did not disclose when asked about possible contacts between members of President Trump’s campaign and representatives of Moscow during Sessions’s confirmation hearing to become attorney general.

One of the meetings was a private conversation between Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that took place in September in the senator’s office, at the height of what U.S. intelligence officials say was a Russian cyber campaign to upend the U.S. presidential race.

The previously undisclosed discussions could fuel new congressional calls for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russia’s alleged role in the 2016 presidential election. As attorney general, Sessions oversees the Justice Department and the FBI, which have been leading investigations into Russian meddling and any links to Trump’s associates. He has so far resisted calls to recuse himself.

When Sessions spoke with Kislyak in July and September, the senator was a senior member of the influential Armed Services Committee as well as one of Trump’s top foreign policy advisers. Sessions played a prominent role supporting Trump on the stump after formally joining the campaign in February 2016.

At his Jan. 10 Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, Sessions was asked by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) what he would do if he learned of any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of the 2016 campaign.

“I’m not aware of any of those activities,” he responded. He added: “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.”

Officials said Sessions did not consider the conversations relevant to the lawmakers’ questions and did not remember in detail what he discussed with Kislyak.

“There was absolutely nothing misleading about his answer,” said Sarah Isgur Flores, Sessions’s spokeswoman.

In January, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Sessions for answers to written questions. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Leahy wrote.

Sessions responded with one word: “No.”

In a statement issued Wednesday night, Sessions said he “never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign. I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is false.”

Justice officials said Sessions met with Kislyak on Sept. 8 in his capacity as a member of the armed services panel rather than in his role as a Trump campaign surrogate.

“He was asked during the hearing about communications between Russia and the Trump campaign — not about meetings he took as a senator and a member of the Armed Services Committee,” Flores said. [...]

The Washington Post contacted all 26 members of the 2016 Senate Armed Services Committee to see whether any lawmakers besides Sessions met with Kislyak in 2016. Of the 20 lawmakers who responded, every senator, including Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.), said they did not meet with the Russian ambassador last year. The other lawmakers on the panel did not respond as of Wednesday evening.

“Members of the committee have not been beating a path to Kislyak’s door,” a senior Senate Armed Services Committee staffer said, citing tensions in relations with Moscow. Besides Sessions, the staffer added, “There haven’t been a ton of members who are looking to meet with Kislyak for their committee duties.”

Last month, The Post reported that Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn had discussed U.S. sanctions with Kislyak during the month before Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Mike Pence, the vice president-elect, and other top Trump officials. Flynn was forced to resign the following week.[...]

23 comments:

  1. Scandals, scandals, no end in sight...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just heard a talk from Mendel Kessin where he says Trump's victory was good over evil, that Trump will allow Esaiv (America) to do teshuvah as Trump will now help Israel and bring the USA into a new prosperity that allows it to do so. He says Trump is emesdik.

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-oB4aM-U8A

    see 1:13

    ReplyDelete
  4. The last line of your comment indicates how reliable the other lines are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As funny as that sounds, this isn't a lie. He wasn't part of the administration when he met with the Russian ambassador. He's a sitting senator, part of the Armed Forces Committee.

    ReplyDelete
  6. nope - he was a prominent member of the Trump presidential campaign when he met with the Russian ambassador.
    As note in the article - nobody else on AFC met with Russian officials. seems suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No one else that they spoke with. That's not no one else. Regardless, he wasn't part of the campaign. He endorse the orange man. That's very different.

    ReplyDelete
  8. In his hearing, Sessions referred to himself as part of Trump's campaign, in the very same sentence when he said that he had no contact with the Russian ambassador. His defense is a different one, that in those meetings he did not discuss any campaign-related issues with the ambassador.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In fairness to R' Kessin, who is smart guy and a decent guy, he doesn't mean that Trump is Yaakov Kamenetsky but compared to politicians we have seen in the past he's more honest in giving his opinions at least. That he was a crook as a businessman knocks that out in my opinion but I guess R' Kessin is impressed by how forthright Trump is and how he is unafraid to speak his mind.

    ReplyDelete
  10. We already know that Claire McCaskill's memory about meeting with the Russian ambassador is faulty. Why should rely on all of these denials? Do you think that Sessions was plotting with the Russians to help Trump's campaign?

    ReplyDelete
  11. do you know for sure that the Russians were innocent bystanders and the call for investigation has no justification?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Speaking your mind has nothing to do with being "emesdik" if a significant percentage of what you say is verifiably false.

    ReplyDelete
  13. McCaskill met him as part of a group, while Sessions met him also in private. The private meeting is suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Even when by speaking his (Trump) mind, he tells lies and stokes hatred and division?!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the possibility that Sessions had any improper contacts, i.e., contacts regarding Russian interference or assistance or any role in the election is remote. You are conflating what the Russians did, and they are probably trying to do every election, with what members of Trumps cabinet and inner circle did. Do you think Sessions conspired with the Russians to have the Russians assist Trump in the election? Do you think he discussed it with them or encouraged it? If the risk of Sessions malfeasance is 1% or less, does it make sense to try to upend the government. Yes, if that is your true goal. Trump is a very flawed individual. A Hillary presidency would have brought us beyond the brink of sedom vaamorah. Are your concerns about Trump rooted in Torah or something else?

    See link from Walter Russell Mead, who supported Obama about Obama, Trump and Russia.

    http://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/02/24/trump-isnt-sounding-like-a-russian-mole/

    ReplyDelete
  16. http://www.dailywire.com/news/14044/manchin-admits-he-and-other-senators-have-met-aaron-bandler

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think you should tell the FBI about your beliefs!. Otherwise it looks like reasonable men want an investigation as to what happened

    Do you really have any knowledge about the subject?. Yes my concerns are rooted in Torah and Torah values

    ReplyDelete
  18. You cleverly (or not) dodged the question. I am glad to know that you say your concerns are rooted in Torah values.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Apparently it's a routine occurrence

    ReplyDelete
  20. But lying about it under oath is not routine.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So why did Sessions lie under oath about any contact with the Russians? If it is routine and he had nothing to hide?

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.