Friday, February 17, 2017

A Jewish Reporter Got to Ask Trump a Question. It Didn’t Go Well.


Jake Turx is a newly minted White House correspondent for a publication that has never before had a seat in the White House press corps: Ami Magazine, an Orthodox Jewish weekly based in Brooklyn. He is a singular presence in the briefing room: a young Hasidic Jew with side curls tucked behind his ears and a skullcap embroidered with his Twitter handle.[...]

When President Trump called on him at a news conference on Thursday, saying he was looking for a “friendly reporter,” Mr. Turx was prepared. He had spent an hour crafting a question about a recent surge of anti-Semitism, with a preamble that he hoped would convey his supportive disposition toward Mr. Trump.

But the exchange did not go the way he expected. A few hours later, with the clip replaying on social media and Jewish groups issuing news releases, Mr. Turx, 30, was still reeling. He said in a telephone interview, “Regretfully, today was a day I wish we could have done over.”


His editor, Rabbi Yitzchok Frankfurter, watched aghast from the magazine’s offices as his young correspondent received a tongue-lashing from the president: “It was a very disheartening moment for us, to watch him being berated.”

The exchange began with Mr. Turx standing up from his third-row seat and gesturing slightly toward his fellow reporters:

“Despite what some of my colleagues may have been reporting, I haven’t seen anybody in my community accuse either yourself or anyone on your staff of being anti-Semitic. We understand that you have Jewish grandchildren. You are their zayde,” which is Yiddish for “grandfather” and often a word of great affection.

At that Mr. Trump nodded slightly, and said, “thank you.”

“However,” Mr. Turx continued, “what we are concerned about and what we haven’t really heard being addressed is an uptick in anti-Semitism and how the government is planning to take care of it. There’s been a report out that 48 bomb threats have been made against Jewish centers all across the country in the last couple of weeks. There are people committing anti-Semitic acts or threatening to——”

At that, Mr. Trump interrupted, saying it was “not a fair question.”

“Sit down,” the president commanded. “I understand the rest of your question.”

As Mr. Turx took his seat, Mr. Trump said, “So here’s the story, folks. No. 1, I am the least anti-Semitic person that you’ve ever seen in your entire life. No. 2, racism, the least racist person.”

Mr. Turx tried to interject, realizing how the encounter had turned. He said he had wanted to clarify that he in no way meant to accuse Mr. Trump of anti-Semitism but instead intended to ask what his administration could do to stop the anti-Semitic incidents.

But Mr. Trump would not let him speak again, saying, “Quiet, quiet, quiet.” As Mr. Turx shook his head with an incredulous look on his face, Mr. Trump accused him of having lied that his question would be straight and simple.

Mr. Trump said, “I find it repulsive. I hate even the question because people that know me. …”

He went on to say that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, during his visit to the United States on Wednesday, had vouched for Mr. Trump as a good friend of Israel and the Jewish people and no anti-Semite.

Mr. Trump concluded that Mr. Turx should have relied on Mr. Netanyahu’s endorsement, “instead of having to get up and ask a very insulting question like that.”

“Just shows you about the press, but that’s the way the press is,” Mr. Trump said.[...]

The Anti-Defamation League issued a statement on Thursday that said, “It is mind-boggling why President Trump prefers to shout down a reporter or brush this off as a political distraction.”

David Harris, chief executive of the American Jewish Committee, said, “Respectfully, Mr. President, please use your bully pulpit not to bully reporters asking questions potentially affecting millions of fellow Americans, but rather to help solve a problem that, for many, is real and menacing.”

Surveys show that Mr. Trump was not the choice of the majority of American Jews, who tend to vote for Democrats and came out in force for Hillary Clinton. Many Jews have been critical of Mr. Trump for not more forcefully denouncing anti-Semites and racists like David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan who endorsed Mr. Trump during the campaign. Many Jewish leaders are also wary of Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s White House strategist, because of the close affinity between Breitbart News, which he once ran, and the white supremacists in the movement known as the alt-right.

But Mr. Trump was popular among many Orthodox Jews. They were reassured to see the Orthodox Jews in his family and attracted to his hawkish line on Israel, his support of vouchers for religious schools and his promise to ban Muslim immigrants from entering the country.[...]

49 comments:

  1. Not a word of condemnation from the RW Jewish media of Trump's dismissive attitude towards the anti-Semitism engendered by his supporters and anti-fact movement. Just imagine if on the other hand, a UK Labour Party official would have claimed that the anti-Semitism furor was a smokescreen for a media attack on socialism...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The uptick is anti-semitism is from the left-wing sore-losers but the media portrays it as coming from Trump supporters. That's why when President Trump heard the "However" from Mr. Turx he became upset. And understandably so.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good that Mr. Tarkeltaub got a nice smackdown from the President for putting him on the spot like that. The only problem is that he and Frankfurter are both azei ponim and will not learn their lesson. There are not enough Jews in the spotlight. We need to send in more, especially ones that look like Bozo the Clown with a soupbowl on their head advertising their Twitter account. And don't ask intelligent questions that are relevant to the situation at hand, rather use your lucky break to whine about antisemitism to a sensitive president who just held what was probably the most pro-Israel joint press conference in history only a week ago. Great job, guys. Thanks for representing all of us so adeptly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. understandably?! Yes since Trump doesn't listen to questions but simply spouts whatever he imagines and obviously any question must be about him so why bother paying attention to what was actually asked!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ami magazine = fake news

    ReplyDelete
  6. So you are saying because Trump is pro-Israel he should do nothing about anti-Semitism?

    ReplyDelete
  7. In what sort of alternative fact-universe is "Muslim-loving" a valid criticism?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ami Magazine is the same level of journalism as Pizza Hut is fine dining.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm pretty sure Trump is sick and tired of the anti-Semitism questions. What percent of the US population is Jewish? 1%? Maybe less? And yet what group does he get continually asked about, accused about, over and over again? He's probably sick of it and just wants to discuss something else.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If you really think it is mostly from "left-wing, muslim lovers" then you are simply in denial.

    ReplyDelete
  11. So being pro-Israel means he should ignore very real concerns about growing anti-antisemitism in America?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Rather than being constantly self-absorbed and criticizing the media he really needs to answer questions. Even Shep Smith of Fox News: "“Your opposition was hacked and the Russians were responsible for it, and your people were on the phone with Russia on the same day it’s happening, and we’re fools for asking the questions? No, sir, we’re not fools for asking the questions, and we demand to know the answer to this question. You owe this to the American people,"

    “we have a right to know. You call us fake news and put us down like children for asking these questions on behalf of the American people,” Smith said. “The people deserve that answer, at very least,” he added.

    https://twitter.com/passantino/status/832338172478500864

    ReplyDelete
  13. So why would an intelligent rarional being become hysterical and irrational?
    Why didn't he say what you said?

    He is sick and tired about a lot of things and this is after One Month!

    It is time for him to quit a job for which he is clearly incompetent

    ReplyDelete
  14. The fact that a small Magazine like Ami got a question in this press conference says a lot about Trumps policy: he wants to give the floor to the friendly press, and shut up the serious journalists who might ask more probing questions.

    This was very obvious when they introduced the video-questions from provincial news outlets all over the country. He wants friendly questions, even if that means that no serious newspaper or TV Channel will ever get a question ever again.

    In the long run, the conferences will be made laughing stock, just like the official newspaper Prawda in the Soviet Union.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If you're nathan of gaza ('aza) is Trump Shabetai?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Since when has When has looking like a Chassid been a problem? And why should it be now, when we have the most pro-israel american president in history? So now "we" should send in Jews that look "American" like Stephen Miller, in order to offend some of Trump's "base" base upporters?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ok. Who is President then? This smacks of conspiracy theory, but I'm game.

    ReplyDelete
  18. simply was responding appropriately to Nathan's comment

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mr. Turx has been on three Cable TV circuit since the press conference defending the President's relations with Jews.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes he is trying to defend Trump's dysfunctional behavior. Unfortunately there is nothing unknown - it is all on the video of the press conference. Trump threw a fit regarding an accusation which clearly wasn't being made.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nope. I simply lived in the heart of left-wing liberalism for a while, Berzerkeley, CA.

    ReplyDelete
  22. When it is used to turn a blind-eye to radical Islam extremism.

    ReplyDelete
  23. True, but Turx's point is that Trump was asked a similar question the day before that *did* try to blame rising anti-Semitism on Trump. So Turx appropriately is being dan l'chaf z'chut and assuming that Trump misunderstood because he assumed the question would be the same as the day before. Turx reported that White House staff reached out to him afterward and assured them they would do everything they could to combat anti-Semitism.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Left-wing anti-Semitism is a problem, but as the ADL and SPLC have documented, there are hundreds of anti-Semitic far-right groups around the country, such as neo-Nazis. Left-wing, right-wing and Muslim anti-Semitism are all real and dangerous. Dozens of bomb threats at JCCs is a reasonable thing to ask a president about. The word "however" has many meanings, and it goes without saying one should let someone finish a question before deciding what it means.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Please ! Why didn't Trump acknowledge he erred and shamed the reporter because he was too involved in his own fanstasy world to listen to what was being said? Why hasn't Trump stated that he will do his best to deal with anti-Semitism? Why do you think that is unreasonable to expect? Anonymous "White House staff" means absolutely nothing without a public acknowledgment from Trump that he thinks something should be done
    Basic question is why you are bending over backwards to justify something you would never do if Obama had said the same thing.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Trump was asked essentially the same question by an Israeli reporter the previous day, in his news conference with Netanyahu, and he dodged there as well. This is the full transcript of what he responded when asked about how he plans to address the recent uptick in anti-Semitic threats (and this is not a satire):

    Well, I just want to say that we are, you know, very honored by the victory that we had. 306 electoral college votes. We were not supposed to crack 220. You know that, right? There was no way to 221 but then they said there’s no way to 270. And there’s tremendous enthusiasm out there. I will say that we are going to have peace in this country. We are going to stop crime in this country. We are going to do everything within our power to stop long-simmering racism and every other thing that’s going on, because a lot of bad things have been taking place over a long period of time. I think one of the reasons I won the election is because we have a very, very divided nation. Very divided, and hopefully, I’ll be able to do something about that. And I—you know, it's something that was very important to me.
    As far as people, Jewish people—so many friends, a daughter who happens to be here right now. A son-in-law, and three beautiful grandchildren. I think that you’re going to see a lot of different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years. I think a lot of good things are happening and you’re going to see a lot of love. You’re going to see a lot of love. OK? Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Not if he expected another ambush like the one the day before at the press conference with Netanyahu. I am certain sick he is and tired of his administration and supporters being linked to those fringe elements whom he has NEVER reached out to nor acknowledged them as opposed to the way Hillary Clinton cozied up to those who cheer on the murders of police officers.

    ReplyDelete
  28. what ambush are you talking about?

    Furthermore it was clear that the reporter was not trying to ambush him and in fact was serving him with an easy to hit home run. Instead he pounded the reporter.

    Or are you saying that Trump didn't have time to digest the "complex" question and therefore had to act on what he anticipated he would be asked?!

    ReplyDelete
  29. 1)In any case Ami was invited by the White House'
    2) What does the quality of Ami's journalism have to do with the quality of the answer?
    3) When was the last time you ate at Pizza Hut?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Nobody here seems to get it. He is personally insulted that despite having a Jewish daughter and Jewish grandchildren people act as if he is the one responsible for the actions of anti-semitism that actually increased under the kushi who preceded him. Trump and his father did more for Yiddin than many of the posters here. http://www.hidabrut.com/article/178516/RARE-PHOTO-Trumps-Father-Donated-Land-for-a-Cheder https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/995a57e8c615bbefb137be8b8065127f4fa73881f2e5b78b6292941c4286761f.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  31. you really don't get it. Nothing he or is father has done gives him the right or excuse to act like a total beheima. A valid question was raised - it said nothing about him as a person. It simply wanted to know what the government was going to do to protect Jews. And yet you seem to feel that a normal person would find that an insulting question?!

    ReplyDelete
  32. You really don't get it, and you never will. You are small minded, and you always will be.

    ReplyDelete
  33. When it is a false accusation repeated over and over and he hears it beginning again he has every right to cut it off. So would you! Does Trump makes mistakes? Sure he does. But this is mild compared to those of Obama who berated police officers without waiting to hear the facts that justified their actions.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The "question" began like earlier ones that blame the uptick in anti-semitism on him. No, he did not have to wait for another slanted "question".

    ReplyDelete
  35. There is a typo in your post you wrote "kushi" instead of "kushkush" or "kushkushon":-).

    ReplyDelete
  36. of course he had to wait to hear the question instead of shooting off his mouth and acting like a total idiot.
    Why doesn't Trump have behave like an intelligent human being? Or to put it more bluntly - is there anything that Trump could do that you would say he was wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  37. oh please what utter nonsense. Trump can't finish listening to an question before he goes ballistic with a false understanding? You are saying Trump can imagine what someone will say to him and it doesn't matter what the person was actually saying?! This is truly post-truth

    ReplyDelete
  38. you are the one who doesn't get it and you never will. I will simply help you survive by blocking your future comments

    ReplyDelete
  39. No. You are the one who is non-nonsensical because you call his reaction ballistic. Was he shouting hysterically at the reporter? No he wasn't. This is what ballistic looks like, https://youtu.be/E-cztljtALM?t=17

    ReplyDelete
  40. No he did not have to wait. Turx launched a long preamble that set the tone for the "question" and it was Turx who screwed up as even Duvi Honig explained last night on Aaron Klein's radio program. In your mind Trump can do nothing right and you look for anything negative you can say about him. I thought your blog was about "Issues of Jewish Identity" not "Bash Trump Every Chance I Get".

    ReplyDelete
  41. Nah. Obama has porridge for brains, not couscous. If Mordechai Ben David can call him a kushi, so can anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  42. no - it is not acceptable and I have deleted it in your other comments. Mordechai Ben David is not the standard of what is permissible. Whether you like Obama - he has a well functioning brain that is neither porridge or couscous.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I realize Trump's mental capacity is strained having to listen to more then 15 seconds - but it is still a requirement within his brain power to understand the question that was asked him - and he failed.

    I don't need Duvi Honig to explain what I am allowed to think and Trump was simply WRONG! like 2+2 = 5

    If you don't understand why Trump is relevant to Jewish identity issues than you should find another blog to read that fits your preconceptions and says what you expect it to say.

    ReplyDelete
  44. his response was not calm and rational. It was in inappropriate. It was insulting and negative. The fact it could have been worse doesn't change the fact that he was wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Please enlighten me how Trump is relevant to Jewish identity issues. Is it because his daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren are Jewish? I can understand why Moe Ginsburg feels her conversion is pasul and to a certain extent I agree with him. But your constant nitpicking of Trump's every little quirk and posting of and ascribing the worst motives to his gaffes baffles me.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I'm not justifying Trump's behavior. I agree with you. I was just trying to explain why Turx replied in the humble, mild-mannered way in which he did, instead of with shrill denunciations.

    I can tell from Turx's Twitter feed he is just as frustrated as everyone else with the President's response (and with this slowness to denounce anti-Semitism, which he has done by this point). In his public statements to media outlets, however, Turx is being polite and understanding, which under the circumstances (being a White House reporter and someone who wants to maintain good will with the President both personally and for the sake of his relationship with the frum population) does not seem unwise.

    Turx has suffered enough from people crazily denouncing him for asking Trump a "insulting" question (which it was not) -- we should not treat him the same way for refusing to harshly criticize the President. Keep in mind that the Trump-supporting Jews so harshly criticizing Turx for the question (and even his appearance) would heap scorn on him even more if he trashed the president for his non-answer. It's OK to try to please everyone and tread lightly sometimes.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.