Monday, June 6, 2016

Stanford U student given 6 month jail sentence for raping an unconscious woman

NY Times  A sexual-assault case at Stanford University has ignited public outrage after the defendant was sentenced to six months in a jail and starkly different statements were published online by his victim and his father, who complained that his son’s life had been ruined for “20 minutes of action” fueled by alcohol and promiscuity.

The case has made headlines since the trial began earlier this year but seized the public’s attention over the weekend after the accused, Brock Allen Turner, 20, a champion swimmer, was sentenced to what many critics denounced as a lenient stint in jail and three years’ probation for three felony counts of sexual assault, and BuzzFeed published the full courtroom statement by the woman who was attacked.

The statement, a 7,244-word cri de coeur against the role of privilege in the trial and the way the legal system deals with sexual assault, has gone viral. By Monday, it had been viewed more than five million times on the BuzzFeed site.

One of those readings happened live on CNN on Monday, when the anchor Ashleigh Banfield spent part of an hour looking into the camera and reading the entire statement live on the air.

The unidentified 23-year-old victim was not a Stanford student but was visiting the campus, where she attended a fraternity party. In her statement, she described her experience before and after the attack and argued that the trial, the sentencing and the legal system’s approach to sexual assault — from the defense lawyer’s questions about what she wore the night she was attacked to the light sentence handed down to her attacker — were irrevocably marred by male and class privilege.

The trial privileged Mr. Turner’s well-being over her own, she said, and in the end declined to punish him severely because the authorities considered the disruption to his studies and athletic career at a prestigious university when determining his sentence. She wrote:

The probation officer weighed the fact that he has surrendered a hard-earned swimming scholarship. How fast Brock swims does not lessen the severity of what happened to me, and should not lessen the severity of his punishment. If a first-time offender from an underprivileged background was accused of three felonies and displayed no accountability for his actions other than drinking, what would his sentence be? The fact that Brock was an athlete at a private university should not be seen as an entitlement to leniency, but as an opportunity to send a message that sexual assault is against the law regardless of social class.[...]

In the statement, Mr. Turner’s father said that his son should not do jail time for the sexual assault, which he referred to as “the events” and “20 minutes of action” that were not violent. He said that his son suffered from depression and anxiety in the wake of the trial and argued that having to register as a sex offender — and the loss of his appetite for food he once enjoyed — was punishment enough.
Brock Turner also lost a swimming scholarship to Stanford and has given up on his goal of competing at the Olympics.

“I was always excited to buy him a big rib-eye steak to grill or to get his favorite snack for him,” Dan Turner wrote. “Now he barely consumes any food and eats only to exist. These verdicts have broken and shattered him and our family in so many ways.”

10 comments:

  1. Finally!!! Justice in America.
    It doesn't matter if the girl wore a yellow polka dot bikini all night long, or had relations a 1000 times with a 1000 different men... A no is a no. And an assault is an assault.

    Yeah, so 6 month is a joke, but the fact that he got a guilty verdict is cause for celebration enough under the circumstances.....

    And who cares that he can't enjoy a steak dinner? How many rape victims go through the same ordeals and worse?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Politically IncorrectJune 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM

    I read the article thoroughly. I think that the verdict is a joke and not only that ,but he wants to appeal it! Contrary to your statement (which in itself the second paragraph contradicts the first,) I think it is a *lack* of justice in America.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In most cases, when a privileged white male, especially one that is in sports and with a clean record is caused if rape, assault, or any sexual misdemeanor they are not found guilty. (Or a very high profile black male with a big black following)

    The fact that he was convicted and found guilty is an accomplishment init self...

    It's a spark of hope that this will open doors in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Poor baby boy, he barely eats and eats only to exist. I think every man that rapes should be forced to experience rape, deep penetration, forcibly, so he knows what it's like. Throw the judge in for good measure, and I always post with my name and my picture... Now what?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Politically IncorrectJune 8, 2016 at 7:09 PM

    Just one question: according to you, why is everybody shocked and outraged to the point that they want to recall the judge?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Because the 6 month sentence is a disgrace and a mockery to the vitim.

    But what society at large fails to realize is that in most cases the rapist from a privileged white background, especially with a clean record and an athletic accomplishment walks away completely free.
    That is the reason she was warned to prepare for a none guilty verdict....
    Also in the larger picture, this shameful sentence may actually be a blessing since it brought so much media attention.
    The public pressure and outcry, and the realization of the pitiful American rape culture, can possibly change the way these cases are delt with in the future....

    Just line MLK Jr' segregation movement didn't happen over night, the reforms to the Judicial system towards rape cases won't either. Every step is a progress, and perhaps the publicity and public out rage was a much needed wake up call.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Politically IncorrectJune 9, 2016 at 4:29 AM

    Although I also perceived this outcome as a blessing in disguise, I fail to see how the disgrace to the victim is separable from more aggressively prosecuting the perpetrator. ...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, it's absolutely not! The judge and whoever else is involved be hounded to finish the the job they started.
    He should not be getting away with a 6 month time out. He should be given several years, with community service after.
    Ckearly the bastered has not learned a darn thing if he is blaming alcohol for his lack of self control.
    Alcohol makes your inner personality come out, not turn you into a predator and criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  9. He already got another two months (a third of his sentence) taken off. So he only gets four months. http://nypost.com/2016/06/09/stanford-swimmers-sentence-for-sex-assault-already-reduced/

    ReplyDelete
  10. A very sad day in the legal system. The only silver lining is that the victim was white. Had she been an african american, there would probably be riots now.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.