Thursday, June 23, 2016

Meir Pogrow: Charismatic teachers: This is a wakeup call about who should teach and how

Times of Israel by Shayna Goldberg  [see also post by Paul Shaviv - his full article on "Charismatic personality and sexual abuse" is a chapter in my book  Child and Domestic Abuse Volume I ]

Another scandal. Another rabbi/educator accused of all kinds of outrageous, inappropriate behavior with female students. This time it is severe enough that rabbis who live across the world, in Israel, New York and Los Angeles, and who span the Modern Orthodox-Chareidi-Chasiddishe spectrum, have come together to sign a letter warning the public to stay away. This time the person involved is thought to have performed hundreds (!) of indecent acts and to have ruined countless lives.

And yet with all the talking, I feel that the real issue is not being spoken about at all. And therefore, despite my deep reluctance to write publicly about any person or place, I want to tell another part of this story.

I knew this rabbi. Eighteen years ago, I came to Israel for the year to study Torah in a seminary where he taught. He lived on campus with his young family in the apartment right beneath mine. From the first time I met him, my overwhelming gut instinct was to stay away. There was something creepy about the way he knew all of our SAT scores by heart, even before we arrived. The way he knew exactly who was registered for an Ivy League college. The way he pursued and initiated chavrutot (study sessions) with very specific girls. Never the weak ones. Only the “best and the brightest.” It felt like a kind of game for him. A challenge. Could he crack the toughest ones? Break them down and then rebuild them? By some, it was considered flattering if he chose you. And there were girls who were hurt and devastated because they didn’t make the cut.

Once he forged that connection, he was manipulative, he played mind games, and he fostered dependence and hero worship. He was sarcastic, biting, and cynical, and he used his sharp mind and his Torah knowledge in cunning ways. He was brilliant, absolutely brilliant. He knew Torah by heart, and, of course, his way of looking at things was always “right.” You could never really challenge his read or his understanding because he was held up by everyone as the ultimate talmid chacham (scholar). He had mastered Torah. And he was only 27.

I stayed far away, and yet the experience of coming into even limited contact with him was incredibly painful. There were a couple of times that he threw out such nasty lines to me that I was left crying so hard that I couldn’t breathe. And then there were the difficult feelings of confusion and abandonment that arise when you try to raise concerns with friends and teachers and, instead of taking you seriously, they make you doubt yourself.

This is the real issue that has plagued my mind for so long. The fact that this man was never, ever fit to be an educator. The fact that knowing all the Torah in the world does not on its own make you trustworthy enough to be given a classroom’s worth of young, impressionable souls. The fact that long before anyone suspected inappropriate sexual behavior, it was glaringly clear that this person employed all kinds of unhealthy teaching methods in order to cultivate relationships with students. And the fact that no one but a few innocent teenage girls seemed to notice.

And so I want to talk about it. I want to talk about teachers who use fear and guilt frequently and indiscriminately in order to motivate and inspire. Teachers who deliberately try to alienate their students from everything they come from — their parents, families, homes, previous schools, communities, shuls, and even shul rabbis. Teachers who break students down so that they can recreate them in their own images. Teachers who cultivate groupies and are dependent on their students for self-esteem. Teachers who lack real relationships with their own peers because they are “so devoted” to their students. Teachers who teach students not to trust themselves, not to rely on their instincts, and not to listen to their inner voices.

Unfortunately, teachers like this are not uncommon, and we don’t talk enough about the damage that they do. About the fact that the rapid growth and change that they foster usually doesn’t last or, if it does, comes at a heavy price. About the fact that their students, years later, often find themselves empty and lost. About the guilty feelings that can stay with a person forever. About the relationships that are ruined in the process. And about the dependence that has been formed.

We don’t talk about it because, in the moment, the picture is so rosy. The teacher is charismatic, “his” classes are well attended, “she” is so devoted to her students, and the growth seems so exciting and real.[...]

People like this are facilitated by an educational culture that celebrates and rewards brilliant and charismatic figures, despite the fact that they are often highly problematic and leave silent trails of ruin in the shadows of their successes.

As a community, we can be aware of this and do a lot to change it. Our schools, administrators, and lay leaders can think, and think again, about our educational goals and about the healthy ways in which to help our students reach them. And, in the event that there are staff members whose behavior is wholly inconsistent with our conclusions, then it’s time that we put our children’s well-being first.

13 comments:

  1. To recap:
    The old fashioned way, of having average educators, who are in the feild because they care is bad. Because the quality isn't up to par. No. Our youth needs better. We need Master Teachers. Society demands it.

    The new way of hiring brilliant teachers is bad because they might be molesters. Is he brilliant? He may be grooming.
    Is he warm to his students? He's probably grooming them.
    Is he aloof? That's bad for a student's feelings.

    Is it a male teacher? His probably a pervert.
    Is is a female educator? She's probably a lesbian. Ah-la Laufer.

    Why in the world would anyone want to help others and work in education?!?

    So, the new new way, is to go back to the old way!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brilliant article - educators should be supporting the autonomy of their students and encourage their own thinking, so that they discover their chelek in God's Torah. Breaking down and molding students never does this, but destroys the innate personalities and spirituality which Hashem gave to each person

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great article,for it is truer beyond words that teachers make or break students.I had a math teacher in high school that one day had to start the class by telling me that I would not aspire to anything!!A teacher has a right to do that??!!Especially in seminaries,where you are dealing with a group of dedicated young women that wants to make an impact on life,having an incompetent teacher is a real crime.
    I really think that the heads of seminaries have to make any teaching job contingent on a no-nonsense policy whatsoever when it comes to the students itselves.Any meeting outside the classroom should only be coordinated with the head of the seminary.It is unfortunate that this should be emphasized,but no young lady paying so much money to go to the seminary,should have her life turned upside down,because of the carelessness of the head of the seminary to check that the staff is mature and respectful toward the students.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The old way is for men to get married by the time they are eighteen (read that: seventeen completed years and in their eighteenth year). Which means girls are married by the time they reach seminary age, since typically men marry women younger than themselves.

    How can this be done today? I am writing a book on this. I will submit it to the blog owner and perhaps he will post it.

    Will that eliminate abuse? No. It will put a crimp in it, though.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This article sounds like a pot calling the kettle black.

    Is she using fear in order to push her methods, her way and her understanding of what teaching should be?

    She does begin by saying that she attended Michlalah at the same time that Pogrow was there. Other than that, she fails to mention a single fact. Everything else is her opinion. Her way and her methodology. She doesn't mention a single study to support any of her assertions (which total more than 10 claims). Why?

    She could have easily written her ideas without using the fear factor. The fact that she pushes to accept her article based upon fear, while criticizing teacher who use fear, sounds a bit hypocritical.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brilliant article. I also agree with Allan Katz.

    How are educators to be chosen? We should expect that schools and educators are not 100% altruistic and will promote themselves also for personal gain, perhaps even illicit gain.

    Regarding choosing an economic system, I believe Capitalism is the worst, except for all the others. This free market system is also the least bad for choosing educators. Ultimately, the consumer (and their parents) must beware and be vigilant. We must teach our children not to excessively trust Anybody. Parents are the custodians of their children and must not inadvertantly relinquish this responsibility to others, regardless of their credentials.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You're too harsh. I don't see any fear tactics in her article. She is expressing her opinion. An opion based on her experience, and probably some common sense.
    In a nut shell, she's saying that anyone who can verbally abuse students, leave them crying, and doubting themselves is not fit to be an educator....

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Unfortunately, teachers like this are not uncommon."
    That is not my observation. Even one teacher like that is too much, but the ones I have seen at the yeshivah gedolah or seminary level are almost all individuals of high quality devoted to the betterment of their students. Otherwise a good article.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Opinions? She lists a whole range of sociopathic teachers and tells us that they are not uncommon. That's not an opinion, it's a statement of fact. Can she back it up?

    Then she tells us about the many ruined relationships these teachers cause, the change that doesn't last, the dependence fostered, the guilty feelings, the feelings of being empty and lost. Again, these are not opinions, they are claims of significant damage among a large number of people. And you don't agree that such sweeping claims need a bit of proof?

    ReplyDelete
  10. How are educators to be chosen? We should expect that schools and educators are not 100% altruistic and will promote themselves also for personal gain, perhaps even illicit gain.

    I suppose the same can be claimed about the author of this article.

    It does not take much to accuse. Especially when invoke a shocking and heartbreaking situation to instill fear as a way to have others accept our opinions and way-of-life.

    ReplyDelete
  11. R' HM shares also Shira Weisenberg thoughts on the issue as well – what she says can be found in the Rabbeinu Yona
    http://haemtza.blogspot.co.il/2016/06/learning-from-pogrow-scandal.html

    שערי תשובה א :כז
    הטעם: מלבד כי הגאוה גורמת חטאים, המדה עצמה - חטאת, כמו שנאמר (משלי טז, ה): תועבת ה' כל גבה לב, ובעל הגאוה נמסר ביד יצרו, כי אין עזר השם עמו אחרי אשר הוא תועבת ה':

    ReplyDelete
  12. No. It happens to be what she says is fact. I know many students over the course of my existance (many of them already married with even high school kids of their own) who recall such horrific teachers with nasty mean streaks from their school days.
    I have personally seen it with my own eyes as well. I think everysingle person on this blog can say they remember AT LEAT one teacher like that from their youth.
    If you don't, I envy your school experience.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Do you like live sex cams? Then visit BongaCams.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.