Setting a personal example is said to be crucial in the parenting
or educating children. However, there
are many kids and students who are being raised and educated in an environment
where parents and teachers are setting great personal examples and yet it has
no impact on these kids or on students.
So what is the problem?
Setting a personal example is said to be crucial in the parenting
or educating children. Albert Einstein said
- “Setting an example is not the main means of influencing others, it is
the only means.”
For sure the ' Do as I say and not Do as I do ' attitude and approach of care givers just undermines the credibility and authenticity of a parent and teacher. However, there are many kids and students who are being raised and educated in an environment where parents and teachers are setting great personal examples and yet it has no impact on these kids or on students. So what is the problem?
The problem is the behaviorist nature of ' setting a personal
example'. Education is not about a passive student or child absorbing
information but a child and student actively noticing what is happening around
them and then making meaning of this. In order to learn from the personal
example of a parent, teacher or Rabbi, the child needs to notice and to be sensitive
to the nuances and the motives behind the behavior or personal example set by
his parent, teacher etc. One can only benefit from ' Shimush Talmeidi Chachamim
', being an apprentice to great sages or being exposed to them if one keenly
observes and is sensitive to the example they set. Education is not only noticing the inconsistencies
and incongruent passages or words in a text, but to notice them in situations
and on peoples' faces. Kids and students don't learn from 'personal example '
because they are simply not sensitive enough to be aware of what is happening
and certainly they are not in a position to reflect and learn from personal
example.
The portion-parasha of Shemot has examples where actively noticing
something peculiar in the environment actually changed history. Pharaoh's
daughter noticed a basket hidden among the reeds. This led her to being a
mother to Moses – the future savior and redeemer of the Israelites in Egypt. Moses
himself while looking after Yitro- Jethro's flocks in the desert noticed a fire,
a burning bush. This excited his curiosity. He went to investigate and he saw
that the bush was burning but not being consumed .If he would not have noticed
the bush, he would not have experienced God's revelation and accepting the
leadership role to take the Israelites out of Egypt. As they journey towards Mount Moriah, the
place where the 'Akeidat Yitzchak' – the binding of Isaac would take place, Abraham
and Isaac notice a cloud hovering over the mountain. Abraham says – do you
notice what I see and Isaac says yes. Abraham asks the same question to his 2
attendants and they did not see anything unique. This ability to notice
reflected on Isaac's spiritual insight which made him fit to be an offering,
while the attendants who did not notice could not continue the journey.
Kids and people have a problem about being grateful and expressing
gratitude. As a sign of gratitude, Moses does not execute the plague of blood
that turned the Nile and other water resources into blood, and the plague of
lice that infected the dust and ground, because he was saved by the Nile and he
hid the dead Egyptian in the sand. In order to be grateful and express
gratitude - ha'carat ha'tov in Hebrew,
one has to be aware and recognize the good that was done. People simply are not
aware and don't see the good done to them. This is reinforced by the fact that
people don't like to feel indebted to others so we tend to subconsciously minimize
or ignore the good done to us.
We are told in the Ethics of our Fathers that a wise person learns
from every person. The difficulty people have in learning from the example of
others is that they t end to be very judgmental and only notice things that
already fit in with their world view and
justify their opinions about people and events. This is very true if kids
don't have a good relationship with parents and teachers and don't see them as
their teachers and guides. Kids must have a good relationship with parents and
teachers and seek relationship in order to benefit
from the example set by care givers and teachers.
Setting an example is not enough. We have to bring kids ' behind
the scenes ' and share our thinking, our motives and values behind our
decisions and actions. We can share our dilemmas, our concerns and perspectives
and get a kid's input as well. Kids can also pick up our attitude, enthusiasm and
why we feel joy and privilege in what we do. The best way to set an example is
to get them involved with us, cooperating and collaborating when appropriate
and solving problems in a collaborative way. In this way, we teach them the
skills needed for their lives, adult life and marriage.
"Personal Example" (PE) needs careful definition
ReplyDeleteI don't know when and where Albert Einstein talked about PE, nor am I aware of the scope, depth and experience upon which he might have expressed his view on personal relations - something far removed from theoretical physics where he is clearly an established giant.
Rav Yehiel Yacabson, a leader whose personal experience with OTD's etc., gathered and cataloged and continuing to this day, after the course of over 40 years along with his colleagues and disciples, discusses and develops PE in his freely available lectures and in volume 2 of his magnum opus, אל תחטאו בילד, in over the course of 50 pages of his terse and compact style. He describes how this topic is frequently misunderstood and incorrectly applied.
A proper understanding must consider and explain 2 troublesome apparent contradictions to the idea that PE is such an critical and effective tool.
1. How can it be that some children coming from homes and environments displaying horrible PE develop to become extraordinary balanced and successful adults?
2. How can it be that some children coming from homes and environments displaying apparently superb PE develop to reject their wonderful heritage and go "OTD" (Off The Derech")?
This posting isn't the place to properly develop and share this. I will only try to present some of his conclusions.
PE is closely related to -גדול שימושה יותר מלימודה - we incorporate mainly that which we experience in real-life behavior.
PE is thus the example which the child *incorporates of his own volition* - mainly subconsciously - from the *personal* behavior of the adult.
A cardinal rule in hinuch is that everything must be performed and evaluated according to the perception of the child - what *the child* perceives, feels and understands.
So to with PE. The child incorporates, according to the level of his understanding, only that which he perceives as flowing from the authentic internal world of the adult.
Children learn mainly by imitating adults with whom they identify. This is an innate and powerful tendency which applies to PE as well.
A child imitates behavior he perceives as a natural part of the adult's internal world. The child is uninterested, however, in imitating the adult's moral behavior when the adult is fulfilling a role (teacher, etc.), all the more so when the adult is putting on a show.
People learn far far more by example than by explanation. Discussion, however, is a powerful tool to enhance and clarify the examples available to the child, mainly those behaviors and attitudes which he already identifies with.
A beautiful article - thank you
ReplyDelete