Sunday, November 2, 2014
International Conference on The Jewish Community Confronts Violence & Abuse
I will be giving two 15 minutes presentations at the "International Conference on the Jewish Community confronts Violence and Abuse" which takes place December 1- December 3 in Jerusalem at the Ramada Hotel. Schedule is still tentative
Monday December 1, in session 3 between 4:30-6 on "The Rabbinic Role in Confronting Abuse" I will talk about:
The critical role of halacha and piety in incorrectly reducing commonsense and the sensitivity to abuse and victims
Tuesday December 2, in the session 4 between 5:30-7 on "Legal Dilemmas Involving Domestic Violence & Divorce", I will talk about:
The halachic problems of using Internet and public protests to free Agunos. The conflict between contemporary values of Get on demand and the halacha that a Get not given freely by the husband is invalid as a Get Me'usa
In Torrent of Rapes in Britain, an Uncomfortable Focus on Race and Ethnicity
NY Times ROCHDALE, England — Shabir Ahmed, a delivery driver for two takeout places, did not have to go looking for young girls. Runaways and rebelious teenagers would show up at the restaurants, often hungry and cold. He slipped them free drinks and chicken tikka masala. “Call me Daddy,” he would say.
But soon, Mr. Ahmed, a father of four, would demand payback. In a room above one of the restaurants, according to testimony and evidence in later legal proceedings against him, he would play a pornographic DVD and pass around shots of vodka. Then, on a floor mattress with crumpled blue sheets and kitchen smells wafting from below, he raped them, and later forced them into sex with co-workers and friends, too.
The girls were too scared of him to talk. And when they did, no one believed them. Once, a 15-year-old got so drunk and upset that she smashed a glass counter. Mr. Ahmed and his colleagues did not hesitate to call the police. After she was released, she was coerced into sex four or five times a week, sometimes with half a dozen men at a time, in apartments and taxis around Rochdale, a town in northwest England near Manchester. [...]
The recent revelations that at least 1,400 teenage and preteenage girls had been sexually exploited
over 16 years by so-called grooming gangs in another northern English
city, Rotherham, stunned the nation because of the sheer scale of the
abuse. And it put an uncomfortable spotlight on issues of race, religion
and ethnicity in an increasingly multicultural nation: Nearly all of
the rape suspects are Pakistani men, and nearly all of the victims are
white. [...]
In a country already fiercely debating issues of immigration and
national identity, the cases have prompted anti-Muslim demonstrations by
far-right groups and some soul-searching generally. Why do
British-Pakistani men figure so prominently? Were they deliberately
targeting white girls and staying away from their own community? Did
police and local officials turn a blind eye for fear of being accused of
racism, losing votes among immigrant groups or stoking the kinds of
tensions that have unleashed periodic rioting in other British towns? [...]
A
powerful culture of shame and honor surrounding premarital sex,
including rape, among some Asian Muslims, may also have skewed the
victim statistics. Honor and shame certainly proved an effective tool
when Mr. Shabir blackmailed his Asian victim into silence during a
decade of regular abuse. “You are damaged goods,” he would tell her,
threatening to force her into marriage if she spoke up, Mr. Afzal
recalled. Asian victims of sexual abuse are three times less likely to
come forward than white victims, he said, citing Home Office data.
“They fear not just their rapists,” said Shaista Gohir, chairwoman of the Muslim Women’s Network U.K.
“They fear their own community and their own family: They fear honor
crime, forced marriage and being shunned and ostracized for bringing
shame to their family.” [...]
A natural fix for ADHD
NY Times ATTENTION
deficit hyperactivity disorder is now the most prevalent psychiatric
illness of young people in America, affecting 11 percent of them at some
point between the ages of 4 and 17. The rates of both diagnosis and
treatment have increased so much in the past decade that you may wonder
whether something that affects so many people can really be a disease.
And
for a good reason. Recent neuroscience research shows that people with
A.D.H.D. are actually hard-wired for novelty-seeking — a trait that had,
until relatively recently, a distinct evolutionary advantage. Compared
with the rest of us, they have sluggish and underfed brain reward
circuits, so much of everyday life feels routine and understimulating.
To
compensate, they are drawn to new and exciting experiences and get
famously impatient and restless with the regimented structure that
characterizes our modern world. In short, people with A.D.H.D. may not
have a disease, so much as a set of behavioral traits that don’t match
the expectations of our contemporary culture.
From
the standpoint of teachers, parents and the world at large, the problem
with people with A.D.H.D. looks like a lack of focus and attention and
impulsive behavior. But if you have the “illness,” the real problem is
that, to your brain, the world that you live in essentially feels not
very interesting.[...]
I think another social factor that, in part, may be driving the
“epidemic” of A.D.H.D. has gone unnoticed: the increasingly stark
contrast between the regimented and demanding school environment and the
highly stimulating digital world, where young people spend their time
outside school. Digital life, with its vivid gaming and exciting social
media, is a world of immediate gratification where practically any
desire or fantasy can be realized in the blink of an eye. By comparison,
school would seem even duller to a novelty-seeking kid living in the
early 21st century than in previous decades, and the comparatively
boring school environment might accentuate students’ inattentive
behavior, making their teachers more likely to see it and driving up the
number of diagnoses. [...]
Circle, Arrow, Spiral - Orthodoxy and Feminism - Reflections on an excellent book regarding
Guest post by Mrs. Rachel Eidensohn (my daughter-in-law)
Review sent to the author Miriam Kosman
As a 12th – 14th grade teacher, I was grateful to
receive a methodical work which organizes together various ideas we tend to
talk about randomly on a "need to respond" basis. I am a teacher, supervisor
and adviser specializing in learning disabled teens from high school years through
adulthood – Including marriage.
In the course of my job, I meet "women rights" issues in various
circumstances: Parental conflicts in the student's families, pre-marriage
courses, haskafa lessons, Tanach lessons and last but not least – Married
students contacting me for consultation.
In my view, one of the most important things I do is instilling in the
students the knowledge and feeling, that being a "Doormat" is NOT one
of the characteristics of a Jewish woman. You will not find me teaching
students "לוותר למען השלום". It is important for me
to note that I have taught techniques to do this to Mechanchos of seminary ages
in mainstream frum schools – such as the סמינר החדש.
With the growing divorce rate in the background, my approach is highly accepted
and appreciated.
The circle, arrow and spiral paradigm are a beautiful way to present the זכר/נקבה
forces, which was new to me.
The idea brought in Devorah Heshlis's "The moons lost light", is
a "must" for the frum intellectually minded women in this generation.
Knowing that the changing status of women is an ideal happening towards the
Geula, and not a perversion in Yiddishkiet enables the Jewish women of modern
times to feel "whole" and not "perverse". I first came
across it in Rachel Arbos's book "מאישה לאשה·", and was looking for more sources about it ever since. B"h
I will get the book. I fell deeply indebted to you for introducing it to me.
The practical ramifications of understanding the nature of man/woman
relationships are one of the most notable resources in the book. For example:
Understanding the problematic results of taking away the natural
responsibilities of the "man of the family" – unmotivated and
irresponsible "grown ups".
I found book two an artful and refreshing harmony, explaining the Mitsvos
in a logically satisfying way, without the apologetic tone which is so common
in explanations of this nature. It is a pleasure reading an explanation which
is not based on "The women is really better then the man" paradigm.
I realize your book is intended to be a מלכתחילה
viewpoint of healthy Hashkafa, and not an apology to sins of (the frum) society.
Nevertheless, as an observer of various unhealthy women relevant situations, I
feel the lack of a few points of interest:
1. In page 272 it
is stated that "as a community, we have the obligation to use all of our
resources to alleviate their pain, within the context of halacha". This is
the only place in the book which mentions the need of changes in society,
within the right context of hashkafa, of course . It is important that the
reader should know that in a lot of areas, the treatment of women is not a
ramification of Jewish hashkafa but ramifications of shortcomings in the
application of Jewish law.
2. Presenting the
changes in practical Jewish law (הלכה)
in accordance to the shift towards the woman's position before חטא אדם הראשון
would enrich the book.
3. Last but not
least: As a life and marriage skills teacher, I keenly feel the absence of stressing
that just as any other person, it is a woman's job to make sure her needs are
respected, regardless of the "other side". Of course, a smart women
"presents her case" in a womanly, haskkafa accommodating way.
Nevertheless, after reading your book, a reader might get the (wrong)
impression that if a female is misused in any way, she should realize it is not
the way of Torah to treat her like that, but aside of asking society for
support she can't do anything about it. This is a harmful message.
In other words, while you do provides tools for clarifying
what a Jewish woman is - nonetheless at the same time you are unfortunately
conveying the negative message that women can at most change the way they
understand their roles - but that they have no right to ask for changes when
Jewish society fails to deal with woman in the correct Torah manner. A counter
message would give the book a balance towards perfection.
Thank you for giving us a
beautiful, well based foundation in Jewish thought.
==========================
DT's response to the book Disclaimer I received a review copy
My reaction to the book is twofold. My response to the book is the reaction I have to Maharal/Rav
Moshe Shapiro's views in general - which form the source of most of the author's ideas. Brilliant intellectual exercises
but largely irrelevant to the real world. So while I would strongly recommend the book as a source for articulating a Jewish understanding of gender roles I was very disappointed for what it didn't contain. In other words it is good for teachers and kiruv workers but is largely useless for people like myself who want an understanding - not just an explanation. For example I was hoping
to see some discussion of the change in the divorce laws through
the last 2000 years - with an explanation of female role vs male
role. She just says that Aguna is a difficult issue.
In short while I did see the beauty behind her male/female concept, I was primarily concerned by the latter 3 points that my daughter-in-law raised. I didn't see any evidence of her ideas pushing to a goal or ideal nor the use of them to explain women in real life. The focus was "these are principles but not people." It comes across as apologetics rather than a means of adjustment of the role of women as society changes. The principles are best used to justify the status quo rather than self-actualization or creating environments for spiritual and psychological growth.
p.s. I didn't read the whole thing. I sampled the material and kept coming up with the same impression so I stopped.
In short while I did see the beauty behind her male/female concept, I was primarily concerned by the latter 3 points that my daughter-in-law raised. I didn't see any evidence of her ideas pushing to a goal or ideal nor the use of them to explain women in real life. The focus was "these are principles but not people." It comes across as apologetics rather than a means of adjustment of the role of women as society changes. The principles are best used to justify the status quo rather than self-actualization or creating environments for spiritual and psychological growth.
p.s. I didn't read the whole thing. I sampled the material and kept coming up with the same impression so I stopped.
Yale's poor handling of faculty sexual harrassment case
NY Times A sexual harassment case that has been unfolding without public notice for nearly five years within the Yale
School of Medicine has roiled the institution and led to new
allegations that the university is insensitive to instances of
harassment against women.
The
case involves a former head of cardiology who professed his love to a
young Italian researcher at the school and sought to intervene in her
relationship with a fellow cardiologist under his supervision.
A
university committee recommended that he be permanently removed from
his position, but the provost reduced that penalty to an 18-month
suspension.
After
that decision, The New York Times obtained extensive documents related
to the case and interviewed 18 faculty members who expressed anger at
how it had been handled, with no public acknowledgment of wrongdoing.
After The Times contacted Yale last week, the university announced that
the former cardiology chief, Dr. Michael Simons, “had decided” not to
return to his post.
The
case involving faculty at one of the nation’s leading medical schools
comes as dozens of colleges are under scrutiny by the federal government
for their handling of sexual misconduct allegations against students.
Schlesinger Twins: "Justice" in Vienna
Times of Israel [see also NY Times for background] An Austrian official’s letter is threatening to undermine the central pillar of a controversial court decision that found a Jewish journalist guilty of defrauding the government
On Sept. 9, senior state attorney Martin Windisch wrote that the government “makes no claims” against Stephan Templ, who was sentenced in April to three years in jail for cheating Austria out of half the value of a sanatorium confiscated by the Nazis from one of Templ’s relatives. In May, the Austrian Supreme Court upheld the ruling but reduced Templ’s sentence to one year.
The court found that Templ had defrauded Austria by failing in his 2006 restitution application to mention his mother’s estranged sister, who would have been entitled to half the $1.4 million his mother received when she sold the property.
Templ rejected the allegation, but when he asked government officials where he should return the money, Windisch wrote to Templ’s attorney, “The republic makes no claims against your client in connection with the conduct of your client.”
Templ’s attorney, the renowned human rights lawyer Robert Amsterdam, has petitioned prosecutors to have the case declared a mistrial.
“This statement basically voids the ruling,” Amsterdam told JTA. [...]
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Does ‘Village of Secrets’ Falsify French Rescue During the Holocaust?
Tablet Magazine The dust jacket of the upcoming American edition of Village of Secrets,
a new book by British author Caroline Moorehead—recently short-listed
for the Samuel Johnson Prize, the richest and most prestigious award for
nonfiction in the United Kingdom—claims that the book “sets the record
straight” about what happened in and around the French village of Le
Chambon-sur-Lignon during the Nazi occupation. Village of Secrets was recently published in the U.K. and in Canada, receiving rave reviews and making appearances on best-seller lists. (It was published in the United States by HarperCollins this week.) Publishers Weekly hailed it as “deeply researched” and “the definitive account” of the rescue effort, while Kirkus Reviews
has praised the author’s “knowledge of the people, the area and the
history,” saying that it made the book “one of the most engrossing
survival stories of World War II.” [...]
Moorehead concedes, as part of her concluding statement, that the pastor of Le Chambon and his family deserve “much honor” for the rescue effort. But, she quickly adds, no more than “all the modest Catholics, Protestants, atheists and agnostics” who joined in. [...]
That there are indeed tensions on the plateau
becomes obvious to anybody who visits there and discusses local
history. It is certainly true that many Jews did indeed find shelter
here and there throughout the small Protestant enclave. (My parents
themselves rented a room in a hamlet on the outskirts of Le Chambon.)
There may well have been a few atheists and agnostics too on what was
then known as the Protestant mountain, and it is possible that some of
them may have joined in the rescue effort—though they have not been
identified as yet by Moorehead or anybody else. And yes, some Catholics
in the area were also admirably active in rescue; Moorehead specifically
cites just one such rescuer, Marguerite Roussel—whose existence the
author happens to have learned about from the very film she attacks.
But to equate Catholic, atheist, and agnostic efforts with the role
of pastor André Trocmé and the role of the other Protestant pastors of
the area and the role of the French Protestant population as a whole is
to deny what virtually every single Jew who went through there then
would tell you: That this was fundamentally a Huguenot undertaking,
centered in Le Chambon-sur-Lignon, and deriving much of its initial
momentum and energy from the pastors of Le Chambon, André Trocmé and
Édouard Theis—and their historic call to resist through the “weapons of
the spirit. [,,,]
Of course, Moorehead is entitled to disagree
with me as well as with virtually all the people who experienced that
time in Le Chambon. Unfortunately, she does so in a book that is riddled
with mistakes and distortions ranging from the relatively trivial to
the major for a book with claims to historical scholarship by an author
who allegedly drew on “unprecedented access” to unspecified “newly
opened archives in France, Britain, and Germany.” Even the photograph on
the cover of the book, under the title Village of Secrets, is not of Le Chambon-sur-Lignon! The stand-in is the tiny village of Borée, miles away. [...]
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Distinction between social judgment and judgment of beis din Rav Hirsh
In researching my new sefer on judging others versus judgment of beis din I came across this relevant quote from Rav Hirsch (Vayikra 19:15).
For judgment outside the court of justice, for judging our fellows in ordinary life, out of this sentence imposing the duty on the judge to adhere sharply to the absolute facts in all strictness, the Gemora ]Shevuos 30a] there learns the rule:הוי דן את חברך לכף זכות always give the best possible interpretation to all matters concerning your neighbour and judge him to his advantage. This is only apparently in contradiction with the judicial formula. For judgment in a court of justice and social judgment do not serve the same purpose. The former has to test the action solely as to whether it is in accordance with the dictates of justice or not, quite apart from any considerations of the individual circumstances or conditions and without regard to the motives. An action, although it may not be legal, can be entirely excusable and yet at the forum of justice must be judged as punishable. And an action judged by its motive can be stamped as highly vicious and yet legally be within the law and unpunishable. But Society has, on the other hand, above all, the personality, the character, in its eye, and every action is, to it, only a symptom by which to judge the integrity or the reverse of its members. Exactly the same justice which in court banishes personality entirely from the judgment, and judges the action entirely in absolute objectivity, that same justice demands in social life the most meticulous and anxious conscientiousness in considering every possible condition which could make the person and his character appear in a better light, and admonishes:
Be not hasty in throwing mud at anybody's character, always be inclined to find excusing circumstances for all actions! This is the same idea of justice which for social judgment says: אל תדין את חברך עד שתגיע למקומו "Judge not thy neighbour until thou hast been in a similar position" (Aboth II,5). "It differentiates between forensic and social judgment to such an extent that to the judge in civil cases it says: "When the parties stand before you, consider them both in the wrong, but once they have accepted your decision and have left you, regard them both as good men": כשיהיו בעלי הדין עומדים לפניך יהיו בעיניך כרשעים וכשנפטרים מלפניך יהיו בעיניך כזכאין כשקבלו עליהם את הדין (Avos 2:5).
Schlesinger Twins: Michael lies to court that Beth went to a beer festival on Yom Kippur to deny her weekend visits with her children!
Guest post from Beth Alexander
It seems there any no lengths Mr Schlesinger won't go and no depths too low that he won't sink to try to discredit and destroy me, the mother of his beloved children.
Every day of separation from my dear boys is another day of torturous pain and agony to endure. Special days like birthdays, holidays and celebrations are especially hard.
Shabbat and Chagim are the most testing of all. These silent lonely days are the harshest reminder of the heavy loss of all my hopes and dreams: the loving Jewish home I yearned to create together with my so-called 'religious' husband, the happy home of fun, ringing with children's laughter I struggled to build, the holiness and warmth I expected to fill my marriage - all devastatingly replaced by abuse, destruction and tears.
Unable to bear the pain of solitude on Rosh Hashonnah, I flew home to Manchester. I sat at the back of shul with my mother and we wept and sobbed in each other's arms, consoling one another; a mother bereft of her children and a grandmother's double pain for her daughter and suffering grandchildren far away. It is the 4th year without my children on the Chagim but the wound is just as fresh and raw as the day it was inflicted.
I wasn't able to stay until Yom Kippur so was forced to spend the fast in Vienna. I went to shul and cried again. Uncontrollably. I was comforted by the kindest people, strangers and old friends who shared my grief and understood what, for any mother in the world, is the greatest loss of all.
Sukkot and Simchat Torah - again separated - but the Tuesday visit I was able to take them to the shul sukkah on chol hamoed brought the three of us pure joy!
It's been a difficult month and truthfully, I'm glad it's over. Until Sammy and Benji are back in my arms, the Chagim will never be the same for me again. Simcha and celebration have been replaced with solemn mourning and meditation.
Yet to add salt to the wound, Michael Schlesinger wrote to the court this week to deny my application for weekend visits claiming that I am not religious and accused me of spending Yom Kippur 'the holiest day of the year' at a beer festival in some far flung place in Austria!!
Why do you tell such audacious lies, Michael? Why did you also lie that the twins were ill on my visit two days before Rosh Hashonnah? You claimed Sammy had pneumonia - which would take at least 2 weeks to recover from - but then both boys were in the Chabad shul just two days later on Rosh Hashonnah. Why did you then ask people to lie for you to deny that they were in shul when others had already seen them there and informed me they were there?
Worst of all are the lies to our children. They have a mother who loves them more than anything in the world. And you continue to deny them my love.
Every day of separation from my dear boys is another day of torturous pain and agony to endure. Special days like birthdays, holidays and celebrations are especially hard.
Shabbat and Chagim are the most testing of all. These silent lonely days are the harshest reminder of the heavy loss of all my hopes and dreams: the loving Jewish home I yearned to create together with my so-called 'religious' husband, the happy home of fun, ringing with children's laughter I struggled to build, the holiness and warmth I expected to fill my marriage - all devastatingly replaced by abuse, destruction and tears.
Unable to bear the pain of solitude on Rosh Hashonnah, I flew home to Manchester. I sat at the back of shul with my mother and we wept and sobbed in each other's arms, consoling one another; a mother bereft of her children and a grandmother's double pain for her daughter and suffering grandchildren far away. It is the 4th year without my children on the Chagim but the wound is just as fresh and raw as the day it was inflicted.
I wasn't able to stay until Yom Kippur so was forced to spend the fast in Vienna. I went to shul and cried again. Uncontrollably. I was comforted by the kindest people, strangers and old friends who shared my grief and understood what, for any mother in the world, is the greatest loss of all.
Sukkot and Simchat Torah - again separated - but the Tuesday visit I was able to take them to the shul sukkah on chol hamoed brought the three of us pure joy!
It's been a difficult month and truthfully, I'm glad it's over. Until Sammy and Benji are back in my arms, the Chagim will never be the same for me again. Simcha and celebration have been replaced with solemn mourning and meditation.
Yet to add salt to the wound, Michael Schlesinger wrote to the court this week to deny my application for weekend visits claiming that I am not religious and accused me of spending Yom Kippur 'the holiest day of the year' at a beer festival in some far flung place in Austria!!
Why do you tell such audacious lies, Michael? Why did you also lie that the twins were ill on my visit two days before Rosh Hashonnah? You claimed Sammy had pneumonia - which would take at least 2 weeks to recover from - but then both boys were in the Chabad shul just two days later on Rosh Hashonnah. Why did you then ask people to lie for you to deny that they were in shul when others had already seen them there and informed me they were there?
Worst of all are the lies to our children. They have a mother who loves them more than anything in the world. And you continue to deny them my love.
What lies do you tell them when they ask you why their Mama doesn't tuck them into bed at night and kiss them goodnight?
What lies do you tell them when they ask you why they can't run into their Mama's arms after a long day at kindergarten like all the other children?
What lies do you tell them when they hurt themselves and cry for their Mama?
One day soon they will discover the truth. Prepare yourself. How exactly do you expect them to react when they do?
========================Witness Statement =================
Vienna, October 29, 2014I, Sofia Collar, Argentina, 65 years old and now living with my daughter, Deborah Collar in Iglseegasse *, **** (Percholdsdorf), Austria, for some weeks, I declare, on my own will, that I met Beth Alexander at the evening of Yom Kipur – Jewish forgiveness day – at the Main Vienna Synagogue, the Stadttempel and as we were sitting next to each other and she did not stop crying I asked her what was wrong with her.Thereafter, we spend during the whole Friday evening service and Saturday – all day long – together and on different times when she could stop crying she told me that she was very unhappy and sad because she was apart from her two little children and could not spend the Jewish Holidays with them.Sofia CollarArgentine Passport 1.8******Tel (in Vienna) 0650 *******Permanent address: Araoz 282 – 6p 191414 Buenos Aires, Argentina
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky claims that vaccinations are harmful
Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky |
Baltimore Jewish Times Read the whole article including the comments
[...] R.B.
encountered significant difficulties when she claimed a religious
exemption at a local boys’ day school. Before her son began school, she
contacted someone at the state Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,
as well as the state attorney general’s office, to inquire about
Maryland’s laws regarding religious exemptions.
“They said that the school could not refuse to accept a religious
exemption,” she related. “But then school started and the nurse called.
She said the school didn’t accept religious exemptions. I told her they
had to accept them so she said I would have to speak with the
principal.”
R.B. reached out to Rabbi Shmuel Kamenetzky, founder and dean of the
Talmudical Academy of Philadelphia, whose wife, Temi, speaks out against
vaccinating children. The rabbi wrote a letter on R.B.’s behalf,
leading to her son’s principal relenting and apologizing.
When reached by phone, both Kamenetzkys confirmed their belief that vaccinations, not the diseases they prevent, are harmful.
“There is a doctor in Chicago who doesn’t vaccinate any of his
patients and they have no problem at all,” said the rabbi. “I see
vaccinations as the problem. It’s a hoax. Even the Salk vaccine [against
polio] is a hoax. It is just big business.”
Kamenetzky says he follows the lead of Israeli Rabbi Shmaryahu Yosef
Chaim Kanievsky, who rules that schools “have no right to prevent
unvaccinated kids from coming to school.”
“What about the people who clean and sweep in the school?” argued
Kamenetzky. “They are mostly Mexican and are unvaccinated. If there was a
problem, the children would already have gotten sick.”
Sharon Billing, a Baltimore nurse and mother, said she once challenged Temi Kamenetzky at a lecture.
“How can you advise young mothers to do this?” she asked the
rebbetzin. “You’re old enough to remember whopping cough and diphtheria.
As Jews, we are required to guard our health.”
Billing has a cousin born just prior to the development of the polio vaccine.
“He was wheelchair bound all of his life and had the use of only one
arm,” she said. “I find it distressing that so many are so uninformed
about vaccines.”
In her 20 years as a pediatric nurse practitioner, Stacy Schwartz of
Pikesville has rarely come across parents who refuse to vaccinate.
Schwartz, who works in a private practice in Cross Keys and at Beth
Tfiloh Dahan Community School once a week, says she believes in
vaccinating all children.
“For us, it’s a public health issue, and there is no credible
research to show that vaccines lead to developmental disabilities,” said
Schwartz, who added that Beth Tfiloh follows Maryland’s state
vaccination policy. [...]
R Freundel accused of Mikve camera: Police set up hotline for those who think they were victimized
Washington Post Authorities investigating a Georgetown rabbi accused of secretly
recording women in a ritual bath in Northwest Washington have set up a
hotline number for people who think they might have been victimized.
D.C.
Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier, in her first public comments on the
arrest of Rabbi Barry Freundel, said Tuesday that the investigation is
expected to take a long time as forensic experts comb through computer
storage devices seized in the case.
“It’s really a tragic case
and it is going to take some time for all the details to unfold,” Lanier
told Bruce DePuyt on her monthly appearance on NewsChannel 8. “I think
this case will be rolling out for some time.” She added, “For people who
are potential victims, that is agonizing.”
The number at the U.S. attorney’s office is . There is also an e-mail address, usadc.bernardfreundelcase@usdoj.gov, and a web site with updated information: www.justice.gov/usao/dc/programs/vw/bernard_freundel.html.
Lanier said it is important that potential victims “who are part of this larger family can follow what is going on.” [...]
Each life is precious: The life of children with severe brain damage
YNET The children of the Chronic Respiratory Care Ward at Herzog Hospital have severe brain damage, but for the dedicated staff it is a priority to give them quality of life.
When Eli arrives to visit his 14-year-old daughter Rachel at the Children's Chronic Respiratory Care Department in Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, he fights to hold back the tears. Instead of crying, he tries to be positive, telling her about the upcoming holiday, sharing all the recent news from their large family, and praying with her.
Sometimes, as he prepares to say goodbye to his beloved child, he thinks she is moving her head as though trying to reach for him. But, painfully, he understands that she can't.
The department opened in 2004, based on the successful treatment of adults requiring respiratory support. There are at present 24 children in the ward - some are conscious and others have minimal response to stimulus.[..]
"Almost half of our children had periods of hypoxia due to various disastrous incidents, such as a baby who suffocated on the lace of a pacifier or a toddler who pushed his head inside a pickle jar full of water," Gil says.
"The second group contains children with congenital problems such as a developmental defect leading to brain dysfunction, a hereditary disease or malfunction created by some genetic defect during fertilization, or complications following meningitis, which unfortunately still occur. The common denominator is their constant dependence on a ventilator," she says.
"However, our work doesn't end with prolonging their lives; it is also about improving their quality of life. Our children receive physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, therapy with animals, music therapy, bibliotherapy and more. The adherence to daily stimulation has certainly proven itself; there are conclusive physiological responses, for example their muscles, which under normal circumstances are very rigid, become looser, and the heart rate and blood pressure decrease.
"Furthermore we have noticed that the children look at us and recognize us, despite the fact that they can't communicate verbally. Obviously they feel more than they understand." [...]
At first glance they
seem so helpless, remote and in pain that crying is an inevitable
response. But when you sit next to one of the children, who is wrapped
safely in the arms of one of their special education teachers, the
picture changes. [...]
Often," says Prof.
Gil, "when people hear about this ward, they immediately think 'What
kind of life is this?' But studies show that children with severe
disabilities are content with their lives; it all comes down to how you
look at it. In our culture, and especially for me as a Holocaust
survivor, life is so precious that it's unthinkable to give it up.
"There are hospitals around the world where when the doctor
breaks it to the parents that there is nothing he or she can do to
improve their child's condition, the parents take one last photograph
with their child, they say their goodbyes and ask for the child to be
disconnected from life support.
"In Israel, apart of the fact that it is forbidden by law, it
just never happens. Throughout the years we have had cases where we have
succeeded in weaning children off the ventilator, and these are our
greatest success stories."
[...]
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)