tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post9023015200684261586..comments2024-03-29T12:21:24.976+03:00Comments on Daas Torah - Issues of Jewish Identity: Aide to top Republican refuses to divorce wifeDaas Torahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07252904288544083215noreply@blogger.comBlogger128125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-84288236587990652462019-04-08T10:51:59.803+03:002019-04-08T10:51:59.803+03:00Wonderful post! I have bookmarked your website as
...Wonderful post! I have bookmarked your website as<br />i really enjoy reading your posts.. Keep up the great writing.<br /><a rel="nofollow">divorce problem solution</a>Daniel Howardhttp://www.divorceproblem.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-88241959472084293122012-03-29T07:04:23.136+02:002012-03-29T07:04:23.136+02:00The Yaskil Avdei actually brings two cases similar...The Yaskil Avdei actually brings two cases similar to this, the first is a rather long one in Yaskil Avdei Even HaEzer 2:8 and the other is ad loc 6:17. In both cases he says that the B"D can "force" the get by requiring the husband to pay increasing amounts of support for his wife and child(ren). He states that as long as that support remains within the bounds of halakha(כפי הדין) you are not <i>actually</i> forcing him to give a Get because as long as he is married to her he is liable al pi halakha for her support and that of the child. <br /><br />All of this is assuming that was no abuse(of either the wife or the children) going on in the marriage. In the latter case he state ad loc 6:15 et alibi that we assur the wife to him and then can force him as in any case of a man married to a woman that assur to him.Rabbi Michael Tzadokhttp://mekubal.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-61440795894032370272012-03-27T07:53:01.737+02:002012-03-27T07:53:01.737+02:00yes in divorce problem main effect on the child be...yes in divorce problem main effect on the child because children see disputes and many problem in our parents then if you link how relieve this problem then link here <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSrbtf-g7c0" title="גירושין" rel="nofollow">גירושין</a>joymohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02624754715036635069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-88624161214402525962012-03-18T13:13:33.546+02:002012-03-18T13:13:33.546+02:00Does anyone know what the outstanding issues are a...Does anyone know what the outstanding issues are at this point? Is it simply that the husband wants a better deal in child visitation rights or is that he feels that he has been so badly mistreated by his wife that he is getting revenge by not giving a get? Or is it that neither side feels that there is an honest broker that they trust?Daas Torahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07252904288544083215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-48526711163138283932012-03-18T12:33:08.059+02:002012-03-18T12:33:08.059+02:00It isn't about right vs wrong.
It is about wh...It isn't about right vs wrong.<br /><br />It is about whether someone can fulfill the definition of a husband after a civil divorce.<br /><br />But this discussion began with a siruv, because the guy isn't responding to a call by beis din. Nor even proposing an alternative beis din. Society can't continue if you allow people to simply ignore the courts. Even if many people are convinced you're in the right.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-61531881633234641082012-03-18T10:17:26.265+02:002012-03-18T10:17:26.265+02:00Micha can you explain why the man is wrong in all ...Micha can you explain why the man is wrong in all situations? Do you see ORA taking on a mans defense against a woman??? Can you with 100% certainty claim that every man listed on Ora's website or the Jewish press "most wanted list" is truly guilty? I know for a fact that several men are innocent but political expedience has gotten in the way! That makes Herschel Schlechter, Belsky, Ralbag and many more guilty of Motzi Shem Ra or worse. So how can you trust them in any of these cases????? All you have to do is look for a case where the woman went to Civil Court without first taking her husband to Bais Din and that would make her a violator of Halocho, yet these rabbis support their actions and are silent!!!!yehoshuanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-64482349356886902952012-03-15T03:14:21.506+02:002012-03-15T03:14:21.506+02:00Baruch HaShem! Thank you. It is unbelievable that ...Baruch HaShem! Thank you. It is unbelievable that this paper really accepted our side, a miracle. Thank you. The world is not hefker.<br /><br />http://washingtonjewishweek.com/main.asp?SectionID=4&SubSectionID=4&ArticleID=16807<br /><br />Your loving brother,<br /><br />DovidRabbi Dovid Eidensohnhttp://www.getamarriage.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-61492250672547732662012-03-14T17:10:44.167+02:002012-03-14T17:10:44.167+02:00http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2012/03/campaign-to-...http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2012/03/campaign-to-get-epstein-get-heats-up.html<br /><br />see above for an updateDaas Torahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07252904288544083215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-72423022542368766142012-03-14T13:39:03.761+02:002012-03-14T13:39:03.761+02:00micha where did you learn? let's speak to your...micha where did you learn? let's speak to your rabbaim to find out how much you know?<br /><br />what is your secular education because boy if you had been in my courses on logic even for freshman courrses i would have to admit you would be the eakest student i ever had over the years?<br /><br />micha i can guarantee you that the people who oppose your views are far smarter than you. you habve quoted a rambam which is completely shelo k'hilcheso, which does not apply here, and quoted rav ovadiah when you are not sefardi. do you keep one day when you go to eretz yisroel? you probably keep no days anyway with the hashkofos you have.stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-74303128997232875572012-03-14T13:35:14.656+02:002012-03-14T13:35:14.656+02:00Micha you obviously suffer from ADHD. I "insu...Micha you obviously suffer from ADHD. I "insulted" tens of rabbonim. I told you that the gedolim do not hold of 4 rabbonim who are corrupt and provided you with a whole list of documents to verify thjat it is not me who doesn't hold of them but the gedolim. Which part is too hard to understand? Address the documentation and contact the gedolim who are still alive as to why they have made him into the ofor vo'eyfer he is? Address the issue, don't go tangential, quote unquote.<br /><br />Once again, address why many of the gedolim told belsky the thug to stay away from gittin, the kashu rov told him to stop distorting halocho and rav shlomo miller made him look like an am ho'oretz with his mafkiah kiddushin for a million quid.<br /><br />Ask the victims of Belsky's corruption for mechila. ask him how he can be involved in beating yidden up?You are mo'us olai ve'al gans klal yisroel.<br /><br />explain how schlachter converted ivsnka. stick to the facts not the tangential callings of you wishing to mekarev yourself to who knows how many women.<br /><br />(anonymity is for people who wish to avoid being harassed at work and shul by the scum of the earth ORA thugs when we simply point out that these biryonim are the gilgulim of the biryonim who destroyed the 2nd bais mikdash).stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-50061676519115802492012-03-14T11:26:01.864+02:002012-03-14T11:26:01.864+02:00"Emes LYaakov", which of my "YU Han..."Emes LYaakov", which of my "YU Handlers" would that be -- R' Nisan Alpert or R' Dovid Lifshitz?<br /><br />After you wash your mouth out with soap, both rabbeim are conveniently buried on Har haZeisim, if you wish to ask mechilah.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-40281489352218091392012-03-14T04:10:40.817+02:002012-03-14T04:10:40.817+02:00Reply to Micha's question - "why are you ...Reply to Micha's question - "why are you so sure a man may refuse to divorce his wife the moredes in all situations?"<br /><br />Micha, your YU handlers have evidently not explained to you basic concepts in Jewish divorce law. Evidently the concepts of MOREDES and MOSERES are quite foreign to the YU / ORA mentality.<br /><br />If a Jewish wife flees with the couple's child and then obtains court orders in ARCHAOS, her husband has the right AL PI HALACHA to demand that the wife nullify the court orders, return the child to the father's town, and compensate the father for his damages. Only then may the Bais Din rule on whether or not the wife is entitled to a GET. <br /><br />Since apparently Tamar Epstein refuses to return the child to the father's city, and refuses to nullify the court orders, she therefore cannot have the status of an AGUNA. On the contrary, she is M'AGEN herself, and labeling her an "AGUNA" is fraudulent. The community has no right to persecute Mr. Friedman due to his wife's actions in violation of HALACHA.<br /><br />Normative HALACHA served us fine for thousands of years before the onslaught of feminism. The feminist halachic deviations of the YU / ORA activists is a primary cause for many of the prolonged Jewish divorce conflicts occurring. If ORA and their supporters would stay out of Jewish divorce cases and allow HALACHA compliant, non-feminist Chareidi rabbanim to manage these cases, a lot more Jewish women would obtain kosher GITTIN.EmesLeYaakovnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-77244305637797571942012-03-14T02:58:12.090+02:002012-03-14T02:58:12.090+02:00Also, IM 4:110.
Which is quoted in Teshuvos veHan...Also, IM 4:110.<br /><br />Which is quoted in Teshuvos veHanhagos 1:781.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-14516420729952118642012-03-14T02:34:19.489+02:002012-03-14T02:34:19.489+02:00Stan,
You directly insult tens of rabbanim, and t...Stan,<br /><br />You directly insult tens of rabbanim, and then turn around and tell some maaseh that you twist into accusing me of insulting someone? Is that rational?<br /><br />Second, I know nothing about the story. I don't know the parties and which options they refuse to consider. I don't know details of the fight that led to the divorce. All I have is the say-so of someone who is both an outsider and shows no respect for posqim. Pardon me if I don't care whether your story plus what I reported as accepted peshat mean you don't understand why R' Reuvein is doing what he is -- even assuming the nephew cares what his uncle holds. But that's not insulting anyone.<br /><br />(BTW, do you not eat OU food or any food from a hechsher that allows OU ingredients? You were motzi laaz on both of the OU's posqim, so how do you accord them neemanus?)<br /><br />How about actually discussing the sources, the pesaqim involved? What's pathetic about me is that I respond to your uninformed mud slinging.<br /><br />- R' Micha Berger<br />(anonymity is for people who want to say things they wouldn't stand behind)micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-31535855620874570362012-03-14T01:28:41.336+02:002012-03-14T01:28:41.336+02:00Lastly and regarding your ta'ayneh of koyfin o...Lastly and regarding your ta'ayneh of koyfin oyso ad she'omer rotze ani, we have never paskened like the rambam regarding this.<br /><br />however, once again, you show utter ignorance and an inability to think. this ruling was based on the se'voroh that really the man wants to do the right thing and do a mitzvah but his yetzer horo prevents him from doing it soi we encourage him to ignore his yetzer horo and do what he really want to do which is follow the halochoh.<br /><br />so cealrly, even according to the rambam, this ruling ONLY applies when there is a mitzvah to be me'garesh her.<br /><br />In a case where there is no chiyuv to be me'garesh her, the rambam agrees that kefiah does not work.<br /><br />Please explain to me why there is a chiyuv to be me'garesh her. The tangential fact that no bais din has ruled that he is chayav le'garsha. <br /><br />yes i know you claim beslky, wohlmark, schlachter, ralbag. this in all probability proves he is not only not chayav le'garsha but it is ossur for him to be me'garesh her.<br /><br />I claim Rav Elyashiv, Rav Nosson Gestetner, Rav Menashe Klein.stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-69165862815769609102012-03-14T01:12:54.888+02:002012-03-14T01:12:54.888+02:00Some more facts. How much shaichos with Rav Moshe&...Some more facts. How much shaichos with Rav Moshe's family do you Rav Eidensohn still have? They have a chiyuv to stop keeping quiet and expose the truth.<br /><br />The truth is that Rav Ruevein feinstein's grandson, Rav Osher Yosef Weiss' (brother of Rav NMoshe Meir Weiss) son, Avrohom has gone to the Bais Din of Rav Gestetner because he is involved with a wicked woman like Tamar. <br /><br />Now micha are you accusing Rav Moshe's son of allowing a man to make his grandson break halocho and make a woman an agunah? Why did Rav Dovid feinstein a member of the moetzes keep quiet if his great nephew is breaking halochoh? Because he is not. Despite all the propoganda out there, the feinstein's know that other botei din are corrupt and have gone for the real stuff. the wife is in arko'oys and a mar'sha'as and is entitled to nothing al pi halochoh.<br /><br />Rav Gestetner who has had his name smeared in the most despicable fashion has refused to publicize the fact that now the feinstein's are using him out of deference to the feinstein's. <br /><br />I however refuse to keep quiet. i found out about this case and rav gestetner's involvement from a very different source and not from rav gestetner. I will keep on publicizing the fact. I judge by action not words. The feinstein's are in the camp of halochoh no matter how you feminsits try to distort rav moshe's opinion.<br /><br />I urge all those who have influence with the Feinstein's to influence them to stop keeping quiet but to publicize the fact that they are upholding halochoh and preventing a woman in arko'oys from gettting her wicked way. maybe in this case, we can start getting the pendulum to swing just a bit away from the feminists.<br /><br />Please micha now go organize a protest outside the corrupt agudah and tell them they are not listening to your idiotic feminist nonsence. they claim not to recognize the bais din of rav gestetner because it is anti feminist. then the logical conclusion is that rav ruevein feinstein's grandson is wrong and pressure must be placed on the family or the agudah must take action against the family.<br /><br />Get some help micha - you are pathetic.<br /><br />is this little secret also tangential?stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-86098519118876251112012-03-14T00:58:26.708+02:002012-03-14T00:58:26.708+02:00micha, you need to absorb what I have been forced ...micha, you need to absorb what I have been forced to boringly repeat for your benefit several times. A fake siruv issued by biryonim whom the gedolim in eretz yisroel have told to stay away from gittin because they are corrupt is far from tangential. perhaps it is to you but to those who follow shulchan oruch, it is not only not tangential but a very integral part of the halochoh.<br /><br />you don't find them corrupt because you are a feminist with the halachik ramifications of someone with hashkofos of kefirah applying to you. again, this is not name calling merely stating a fact.<br /><br />once again you have totally misundersttod reb moshe's position. reb moshe wrote in the case quoted about a man who agreed to a settlement le'achar ha'maaseh as to whether the get is kasher or not. he never wrote that in a case where a woman is an oyveres al das, a moyredes and a moyeseres that ONE IS CHAYAV LE'GARSHO. He would not do so because this would chas ve'sholom kae him a sonei the rinoyno shel oylom. so please, your interpretation abilities of halochoh are non existent.<br /><br />again read the t'shuvas of contemprary poskim like hago'on hatzaddik kevoyd kedushas admor mi'ungvar rav menashe klein a holocast and camp survivor, so unless you are accusing him of being callous or heartless, you need to face reality.<br /><br />read the p'sakim of rav elyashiv, rav nosson of le'horos nosson, rav wosner etc. <br /><br />if the facts according to you are tangential, you do not belong in a forum arguing halochoh. but in a vieba online coffee bar arguing about feelings. chas ve'sholom that you should demand a man losing his job, being me'vayesh him be'rabim etc and ignoring the facts. <br /><br />As I said previously you are not worthy of my contempt. micha, you are out of your league here. you are dealing with talmidei chachomim, deep thinkers with PhD's, Ivy League graduates, graduates of Mir and other Ivy League yeshivas. You are getting slaughtered. Have rachmonos on yourself and keep quiet already.stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-42202857959643545582012-03-13T23:53:16.905+02:002012-03-13T23:53:16.905+02:00BTW, why are you so sure a man may refuse to divor...BTW, why are you so sure a man may refuse to divorce his wife the moredes in all situations? Even if assuming those were, indeed, the facts of the case. (I have no idea where reality sits between the "he says" and "she says".)<br /><br />As I said, it's tangential.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-68666040700789812512012-03-13T23:51:21.729+02:002012-03-13T23:51:21.729+02:00Lemaaseh, recent shu"t do conclude "kofi...Lemaaseh, recent shu"t do conclude "kofin oso ad sheyomar rotzeh ani" after a civil divorce, regardless of the grounds of divorce.<br /><br />Rav Moshe, whose opinion SHOULD NEVER be marginalized when speaking of pesaq in the US, is not a daas yachid anyway.<br /><br />You aren't arguing with me personally. You are bringing up tangential issues (anything BUT the scope of when kofin oso) in order to somehow "prove" that the vast majority of poseqim are corrupt and intentionally violating halakhah. It's not a tenable position.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-29119478712433976522012-03-13T23:36:02.223+02:002012-03-13T23:36:02.223+02:00micha there is nothing purported about who you are...micha there is nothing purported about who you are. you are what you<br />are. I wouldn't put you in the rosho category at all, because you<br />clearly know squat about halochoh so there is a general term called am<br />ho'oretz but i will not call you that out of deference to the request<br />of the host of the sight. you are the one with the so-called garbage<br />agunah lie and elevator pitch about oyno which is so totally<br />irrelevant, it is pathetic since it is clearly a buzz word that you<br />have picked up upon. just as quick background:<br /><br />1) tamar moved out and so any oynoo problem is her own fault. it is<br />not aharon who is the problem here but tamar. a moyredes does not get<br />a reward despite your ignorance which is clearly telling here.<br />2)the court being concluded has less than zero basis in halochoh so<br />using this as grounds for a get is nonsence.<br />3) this woman is a classic moyredes, oyveres al das and moyseres and<br />is entitled to the following al pi halochoh, paying her husband's<br />legal fees, begging for t'shuva and before that even if aharon gives<br />her a get, it is ossur for any yid to marry her al pi halochoh as per<br />the kol koreh of rav menashe klein, the beirach moshe, the skulener,<br />rav shmuel birnbaum and many others zichronom livrocho.<br /><br />you know zero about halochoh, cf your previous calls for "contemporary<br />poskim" as if the torah changed and why the rashbo etc is not good<br />enough only you and those you associate with can know. furthermore<br />your requests for where exactly in the 5 poskim listed by rav<br />eidensohn, the relevant p'sakim are found again illustrates nay<br />highlights your ignorance.<br /><br />For the record I never initiated calling Belsky, Wohlmark, Ralbag and<br />Schachter reshoim. The first 3 rav elyashiv paskened because of their<br />blatant and repeated corruption their gittin are posul. i am merely<br />relaying what was said. and you should look at the links where the<br />opinions of the gedolim on these ra bonim are given with halachik<br />reasons. only an anti-thinker, shoots the messanger not the message.<br /><br />most gedolim have never even heard of herschel schlachter. he is a kal<br />she'bekalim, and his conversion of ivanka, presumably for $$$, because<br />there is no other reason for this conversion, when she openly still<br />celebrates xmas, and is mechalel shabbos and eats treif be'farhesyah<br />says it all. unfortunately in<br />america, an odom godol, rav gestetner, has had to waste his precious<br />time writing a letter of cheirem against schlachter when he has far<br />better things to do.<br /><br />that sammy kamenetsky puts his name torgether with these ra bonim, he<br />will have to answer in shomayim for. his father who stood for emes<br />must be turning in his kever.<br /><br />if you really want contemporary poskim, look at what rav menashe klein<br />says about these women. that they are so wicked, the cheirem of<br />rabbeinu gershom was never instituted to hurt innocent men from them.<br /><br />that you have no concern for the fact that tamar ran off with the<br />child to a different state, against halochoh exposes what you stand<br />for. feminism against the torah.<br /><br />micha i really feel bad for you. what is your interest in tamar? are<br />you in a relationship with her? do the $$$ impress you?stannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-24788900083028951602012-03-13T23:30:22.814+02:002012-03-13T23:30:22.814+02:00Mrs. Friedman is clearly a MOREDES who abandoned h...Mrs. Friedman is clearly a MOREDES who abandoned her husband and absconded with the couple's child to another state. Therefore by making the bogus claim that the Friedman case involves "a man who refuses his chiyuv onah", Micha demonstrates the ignorance of HALACHA, intellectual dishonesty, and moral bankruptcy of the YU / ORA feminist reformadox militants he represents. <br /><br />In ORA's feminist "religion", the concept of a MOREDES simply does not exist, and women are never held accountable for their actions. According to YU / ORA's perverse reformadox "HALACHA", any time a Jewish wife is a MOREDES and separates from her husband (for example abandoning her husband or sueing her husband in court), the husband is immediately obligated to give a Get. This is an utter perversion of HALACHA. <br /><br />Do not be deceived by Micha's deceptive photo suggesting he's a CHAREIDI. Micha is part and parcel of the YU / ORA feminist movement which aims to uproot halachic Judaism and replace it with a perverse feminist "religion" contrary to Torah. ORA feminist activists continually misquote, falsify, and obfuscate HALACHA to an unsuspecting Jewish public, in an effort to justify supporting Jewish women to obtain anything they demand in divorce settlements, regardless of HALACHA, while forcing PASUL GITTIN from the women's harassed, terrorized, and slandered husbands.<br /><br />Herschel Schachter is the political boss of the wicked, corrupt, reform Organization for the Resolution of Agunot, which is leading the lynch mob against Mr. Friedman and many other decent Jewish men. Mr. Friedman did not appear before a Bais Din convened by feminist ORA Boss Herschel Schachter, and Mr. Friedman has no obligation to obey Schachter's dictates. <br /><br />Herschel Schachter was put in cherem by a Monsey Bais Din - see http://rabbischachter.blogspot.com/EmesLeYaakovnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-17704339196936602392012-03-13T19:56:43.575+02:002012-03-13T19:56:43.575+02:00I missed who said who filed for divorce. But I fai...I missed who said who filed for divorce. But I fail to see relevancy. The question isn't the civil divorce, but the impossibility of qiddushin after the damage was done.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-47543518468069699802012-03-13T19:07:41.215+02:002012-03-13T19:07:41.215+02:00One of the many falsehoods being spread by Ora abo...One of the many falsehoods being spread by Ora about the case and that<br />has been repeated by at least one poster on this blog is that Aharon<br />filed for divorce in civil court. Aharon never filed for divorce in<br />any forum. It was Tamar who filed for divorce in civil court<br /><br />for all the details in this case with documents to back them up go to:<br />http://aharonfriedmantamarepstein.blogspot.com/ and<br />http://stuffandnonsensesaidalice.blogspot.com/observernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-877669950180144902012-03-13T16:02:20.348+02:002012-03-13T16:02:20.348+02:00Stan,
If you want to limit the conversation to wh...Stan,<br /><br />If you want to limit the conversation to what's on topic, stop talking about who is a purported rasha, or whether or not going to arkaos is mutar.<br /><br />This couple went to arkaos. If it was not called for in their case (and it rarely is) then that <b>was</b> a halachic problem. It's a little to late to worry about that though.<br /><br />What currently exists is a man who refuses his chiyuv onah and won't give a gett. Yes, she said ma'us alai first, but that doesn't make it any more permissable not to give a get, not remove beis din's obligation to compell such a man to give a gett. If a woman becomes an outright moredes, the man can't refuse to give her a gett in this situation. (Although she would forfeit her kesuvah.)<br /><br />That's the topic. Apparently, Stan, you have a prepared speech about assimilation and its expression in over-use of secular courts and adoption of feminism. Aside from the issurim of wrongly accusing numerous people, never mind rashei yeshiva and noted posqim (and you're worried about my accusing R' Dovid Eidensohn of doing the same?), aside from name calling being a violation of the laws of tokhachah, it's simply not the question before us. I'm sorry if you are frustrated by my ignoring your prepared topic in my attempt to stick to that question.<br /><br />I also question whether it's mutar to visit the comment section of this blog, or if it violates the first pasuq of Tehillim.<br /><br />Yes, our host could clamp down on the sophomoric name calling in moderation. But sweeping the leitzanus under the rug doesn't change the number of leitzim in this "moshav".<br /><br />Frankly I think it does more damage to your own credibility than harm me any. Any third party reading the exchange will see one side trying to stick on topic, and another calling him and numerous other people names and making unsupported accusations. It removes any aura of rationality from your side of the debate. As our host noted, it is counterproductive to your own goals.<br /><br />IIRC, it was R' Chaim Brisker who spoke of the difference of the housewife's and the cat's desire to get rid of a mouse found in their home. The cat also wants to get rid of the mouse, but unlike her owner, she eagerly awaits the next one.<br /><br />I mention this to open the question of whether the current topic set of this blog is actually serving the purpose for which our host was asked to choose it.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7309929059139673041.post-51523851935027938602012-03-13T03:16:57.931+02:002012-03-13T03:16:57.931+02:00A man who grants a civil divorce has declared an i...A man who grants a civil divorce has declared an intent to violate his chiyuv onah, and thus kofin oso ad sheyomar rotzeh ani.<br /><br />As long as the social pressure originates from a beis din, and not vigilantes acting on their own.<br /><br />micha please keep these posts for 20 days time, april fools. as i posted previously, you are not motivated by the torah but by american feminism.<br /><br />why else do you not focus on the issur arko'oys and mesirah which is a problem 100 fold over the alleged agunah problem which so consumes you.<br /><br />as for your disrespect of rabbi eidensohn, who is merely following halochoh, your behavior is to be condemned.<br /><br />here are some facts about the allegedly impressive list of thugs on friedman's fake siruv.<br /><br /><br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/DINTORAH2.htm<br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/books/DINTORA_BELSKY_YSH-E.pdf belsky <br /> <br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/books/DIN_TORAH_GET_KEDUSHAT_LEVI.pdf on wohlmark i think<br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/books/DIN_TORAH_KEDUSHAT_LEVI_KOLKORE.pdf<br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/books/DINTORAH_NEGED_BORERIM.pdf issur and corruption of ZABLA bizman hazeh<br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/books/DINTORAH_KOLKORE_SHUMUSHAMAIM.pdf on belsky being mattir an eishes ish<br /> <br />http://www.israel613.com/books/DINTORAH_BEWARE_DANGER.CV.pdf ralbag <br /> <br /> <br />etc, etc, etc<br /> <br /> DO T'SHUVA ALREADY PLEASE. THESE RE'SHOIM ARE GOING TO BURN.stannoreply@blogger.com