Wednesday, December 2, 2015
Tamar Epstein's Heter: Rav Shmuel Feurst joined Rav Nota Greenblatt in giving the "heter"
I have gotten a direct answer to the question from a well qualified source. He stated categorically that Rav Feurst had agreed with the heter but he added that there are others. Rav Feurst is a well regarded posek and also a talmid of Rav Moshe Feinstein. Thus we are not talking about Rav Greenblatt having an off day and following the Daas Torah of Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky. We see that there are poskim - who clearly should know better - who agreed to this "heter" without bothering to check the facts as presented by R Shalom Kaminetsky and did not bother to hear the other side. Thus the corruption in the system is significantly worse than if the entire responsibility was on Rav Nota Greenblatt. It is also astounding that a posek of Rav Feurst's stature would not acknowledge that he was a major player in the "heter" or even acknowledge that he was involved.
I have also heard reports that this isn't the first time that Rav Feurst has declared that a Get wasn't needed because of "mekach ta'os". Someone mentioned that he has done it at least 15 times. At the present time I do not know whether this report is correct and whether the conditions specified by Rav Moshe Feinstein were met in the other cases. However there is no question that in Tamar Epstein's case Rav Moshe Feinstein would not have accepted the false data and the false conclusions.
It is time for Rav Greenblatt and Rav Feurst to either defend their psak or retract it. As Rav Greenblatt has noted, a secret psak by anonymous poskim is not to be taken seriously.
Monday, November 30, 2015
Sunday, November 29, 2015
Rav Nota Greenblatt: Problem of relying on others for the facts that determine psak
Dear Rabbi Eidensohn,
There is a tragic situation I have been trying to do
something about for several years. Perhaps your recent
endeavors can help.
In
January 2014 I spoke to Rabbi N. Greenblatt of
Memphis, TN who confirmed the Halachos of Orech
Chaim, siman 366 require that if anyone is
prevented from access from the food component of
the community eruv, the eruv is
invalid. There are several people in Las Vegas
that the Young Israel does not allow on the
property, most notably a widow (http://cleanupyoungisrael.blogspot.com/)! It
appears that Rabbi Greenblatt's son Rabbi Yaakov
Greenblatt, who participated in construction of
the eruv, was not informed of the
situation in the area the eruv was to
encompass.
When I called Rabbi Greenblatt in Memphis
it was very clear he knows the Halacha of eruv that the Kollel failed to fulfill. He
said he was going to check into it. When I called him
back he said that he had been assured by the "Bnei
Torah of the Kollel" that everything is all right. He
didn't know about the widow, he didn't know what
happened to Rabbi Peltz (http://cleanupyoungisrael.blogspot.com/2012/01/leaders-of-young-israel-of-las-vegas.html)
and he has no idea how Rabbi Edgar Gross, z'tl was
threatened if he dare try to enter the shul (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByDyf3w55PRPdWNuaDdOcnhVbjQ/edit?usp=sharing).
Rabbi
Greenblatt simply put his trust with "the
Kollel", a kollel that disregarded a seruv on the
excommunicated leader of the shul, that
everything is all right so to him the eruv erected by his son is ok.
Any way you can help with this situation
would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Asher Kaufman
Fax number, 763-322-2342
If anyone wants to speak with me they can either email or fax their number to me and I will call them back.
Rav Nota Greenblatt featured at conference about Gittin - teaching about sensitivty to the individuals involved
Jewish Link [This article is genuine]
Most of the active mesadrei gittin (get administrators) in the United States gathered in Manhattan last
week for a day-long conference. It was a fantastic event. We had the
privilege and opportunity to hear from leading halachic authorities such
as Rav Nota Greenblatt, Rav Hershel Schachter, Rav Mordechai Willig and
Rav Mendel Senderovic (listed in order of age). The focus was on
addressing the manifold halachic challenges involved in gittin
administration, such as securing the cooperation of recalcitrant men and
women.....
One vignette stands out, though, in my
mind as most memorable and insightful. Rav Nota Greenblatt, the
country’s senior get administrator who has been administering gittin
since 1952(!), related how he dealt with a particular challenge he
encountered in a midwestern city. The woman insisted that she should
hand the get to her husband instead of the Torah-mandated procedure of
the husband handing the wife the get. She argued that since it was he
who misbehaved during the marriage and not she (a fact that went
unchallenged by the husband) then she should be the one to deliver the
get.
This poses a serious challenge since a
get delivered in such a manner is unquestionably halachically invalid,
yet the woman was unwilling to cooperate in the traditional procedure.
Rav Greenblatt patiently sat down with the woman and told the following
story. His wife’s first delivery was an extraordinarily difficult one,
with labor taking over thirty hours (!). When coming for the delivery of
the next child, the Greenblatts (who reside in Memphis) hired the
finest OB-GYN in the state of Tennessee. Rav Greenblatt told the wife
that he asked the doctor if this time he could deliver the baby
considering the difficulty of the prior delivery (by this time, the wife
was already laughing). Rav Greenblatt noted that it is not fair for the
husband to sit by on the side while his wife does the labor. It would
seem far more equitable if the wife delivers the first child, the
husband delivers the second and they flip a coin to decide who delivers
the third.
Rav Greenblatt explained that God has
ordained that it is the woman who delivers the children, notwithstanding
our sense of fairness. So, too, Rav Greenblatt explained, if it were up
to him, the husband should deliver the get to his wife if she
misbehaved and vice versa if he acted poorly. However, God revealed at
Mount Sinai a specific procedure in which the get is to be delivered
under all circumstances. Laughing heartily and appreciating the insight,
the wife then readily consented to receive the get in the halachically
prescribed manner. What a fine example of sensitively bridging culture
gaps with humor and wit! ....
Tamar Epstein's Heter: Is R Nota Greenblatt or R Shalom Kaminetsky going to inform Tamar that she needs to separate from her new husband?
Considerable progress in dealing with the phony heter has been made. In fact it is no longer a question of how many people support the heter. The answer is absolutely no one!
At this point - even Rabbi Greenblatt is fully aware that the heter that he gave is invalid. He blames R Shalom Kaminetsky for putting him in a very unpleasant situation where not only the Rabbanut wants to disqualify his future Gittin - but there is such talk also here in America.
Even without publishing his teshuva - enough people have read it to be aware that it is nonsense and was based on his blindly accepting everything that the Kaminetsky's told him. Even he is aware that the facts are false and that he permitted Tamar to be in an adulterous relationship.
The present question is who has the obligation to inform Tamar that her new marriage is invalid? Is it Rabbi Greenblatt who provided the heter to remarry and in fact was the mesader kedishin or is it Rabbi Shalom Kaminetsky who manipulated Rabbi Greenblatt - through his father - into giving the heter and marrying Tamar and Adam.
Perhaps it should be the gedolim of the Agudah who stood silently by and voiced no objection even after it was clear that a horrible perversion of Torah had happened at the highest levels? Maybe it should be Rav Herschel Schechter who publicly announced that the word of Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky in Tamar's quest for a divorce should not be questioned? There are clearly other candidates.
In short, we have a situation where Tamar Epstein is living in sin because of unquestioned obedience to the doctrine of Daas Torah of Gedolim. Who is going to tell her that the Emperor has no clothes and that she has been horribly betrayed? Each minute that she stays together with Adam, there are rabbis who will be paying the price for their hesitancy.
Saturday, November 28, 2015
Tamar Epstein's Heter reaches the press- "Former ‘chained’ woman remarries in Memphis"
A former Silver Spring woman who was a central figure in the ongoing
efforts to reform how the Orthodox community deals with men who refuse
to grant their wives a Jewish divorce has remarried.
Tamar Epstein married Adam Paul Fleischer on Sept. 24, in a ceremony in Memphis, Tenn....
Because they are still married in the eyes of Jewish law until they receive a get, such women are known as “chained” women, or agunot
in Hebrew. With several religious authorities viewing a husband’s
refusal to grant the document as tantamount to spousal abuse, Friedman
had been banned from communal activities in several locales, including
in the Washington area, pending the Silver Spring man’s granting of a
get....
The process by which Epstein was allowed to remarry has come under
scrutiny, according to several sources. At issue is whether her marriage
to Friedman was satisfactorily annulled....
Several people told Washington Jewish Week that Tamar was told
she was a free woman by a Philadelphia rabbi who declared that Friedman
had severe mental issues that existed prior to the couple’s marriage,
including paranoia and obsessive compulsive disorder, and that had she
known of these conditions, she would not have married him. Therefore,
halachically she could move on with her life, the rabbi declared....
Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch, vice president of the Rabbinical Court in Israel, wrote a blog post in protest of Epstein’s remarriage.
A decision by some rabbis that the Epstein-Friedman marriage was over
even though Epstein “had lived with her first husband for an extended
period of time and she had borne a daughter from him,” is not the way it
works, he said.
“I saw the [ruling] that ‘freed’ her. I hate to say this, but the
[ruling] is total nonsense. Taking the approach of this [ruling], it is
possible to destroy the whole framework of halachic marriage,” he wrote. “Such an approach is destructive to Judaism and uproots the basic laws governing Jewish marriage.”
According to Sternbuch, Epstein is still married to Friedman “in every respect.”...
[Rabbi] Kranz, who believes Epstein must receive a Jewish divorce before she can
go on with her life, called the matter “a tragedy, a really big
tragedy.”
Friday, November 27, 2015
Why aren't Rabbi Jeremy Stern and ORA protesting the false heter that has resulted in Tamar committing adultery?
Over the years we have had many discussions of the problem of women who
want to leave their marriages but their husband refuses to give them a Get for
various reasons. While we have some significant disagreements in the realm of
halacha, I acknowledge there has always been one person - Rabbi Jeremy Stern and his
organization ORA - that has consistently taken the side of the woman. He has
sincerely devoted much effort to try and help anyone who claims to be an aguna.
He has organized public demonstrations of hundreds of people to try and help a
wife obtain her Get. He is very knowledgeable about the use of the media and
how to create maximum pressure on the husband and his family to produce a Get. The
common denominator in all those that he tries to help is that they are all
women. They are viewed by Rabbi Stern and his halachic advisor Rav Herschel
Schecter as being victims of the husband,
apathy of the public or rabbis who lack their commonsense human sensitivity to
suffering.
In short, I am sure if I called up Rabbi Stern at 3 a.m. and
told him there was a woman who needed help – he would immediate start working
on finding a solution.
So why haven't we heard from him, ORA or Rav Herschel
Schecter regarding the false heter that Tamar received? Why haven't they
organized public demonstrations against Rav Greenblatt or the Kaminetskys? Why
doesn't the fact that Tamar is now committing adultery as the result of
rabbinic incompetence cause them to be outraged? Isn't Tamar also a suffering
victim? Aren't they bothered by the major corruption of the halachic process that has taken place. Why don't they heed the call of Rav Sternbuch and other rabbis to protest the disgrace to the Torah?
It can't be that they don't know about it. It can't be that
they are unaware of the elementary halachic errors used to justify the
"heter". Even more obvious is that they can not be unaware that
the psychological "evidence"
used to justify the "heter" is total nonsense.
Perhaps they claim they are working behind the scenes to
rectify the error? Or perhaps that they are worried for the loss of emunas
chachomim because big rabbis made a terrible error? Perhaps they think the case
should be covered up to prevent a chilul haShem of Titanic proportion? Highly
unlikely.
Or perhaps they are afraid to publicize that the advice that
rabbis give to women sometimes is wrong. Perhaps they don't want to acknowledge
that not every strategy that seems to help women get out of a marriage is
correct.
It seems that they are paralyzed because the protest against
the heter is a protest against their categorical feminist focus and they simply
can't do it. If this "heter" is wrong – people might starting
thinking other heterim are also wrong.
Rabbi Stern - please prove me wrong. Please stand up and protest Tamar's plight.
ANOTHER GIGANTIC NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF TAMAR’S FAKE היתר:
Guest post by Ploni
Allow me to point out another serious problem with Tamar’s היתר. I believe that this problem points to the total lack of responsibility involved in attempting to use the רופא מומחה as a so called "עדות" that AF is a חולי רוח שמפריע לנשואים, as stated in Rabbi Greenblatt’s recent letter.
Quoting from the specialty guidelines for both psychologists and Psychiatrists, it turns out that WHEN FURNISHING WRITTEN OR ORAL EXPERT OPINION IN REGARD TO AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS NOT BEEN PERSONALLY EXAMINED, A FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH PRACTITIONER (MHP) IS REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE “LIMITATIONS ON THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS” (Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists, §VI[H], 1991) and / or “CLEARLY INDICATE THAT THERE WAS NO PERSONAL EXAMINATION AND THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ARE THEREBY LIMITED” (Ethical Guidelines for the Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, §IV, 1987).
Got that? In cases like that of AF, the mental health practitioner has a legal obligation to disclose that both the reliability and the validity of his “product”, namely his evaluation, is of “limited” value!
A well-known fact in this case is that Tamar’s Friends and Family (TFF) are relying on a secular DSM diagnosis to prove AF’s purported mental illness. We are not privy to the personal communications between MHP and TFF. Perhaps the MHP DID disclose to TTF the “limitations on the reliability and validity of their professional products”. Unlikely, but possible.
We are however EXTREMELY CERTAIN that TFF did most definitely NOT notify any of the Rabbonim about this lack in validity and reliability. What makes us so sure? NO Rov with even one iota of ירא שמים – including both Rabbi Kaminetsky and Rabbi Greenblatt – would ever be מתיר אשת איש, had they known from the get-go that said evaluation is of questionable worth. To the contrary, TFF made EVERY EFFORT to prove that the evaluation IS valid and reliable. Rabbi Greenblatt’s letter pretty much says the same thing.
What we see here is לפענ"ד mind boggling. A היתר based on secular “science”, while that very “science” states unequivocally that it lacks validity and reliability! שומו שמים!!!
Who is responsible for this obvious lapse in judgement???? Did none of the מתירים have the אחריות to ascertain the validity and reliability of the diagnosis? Is this what סוד ה' ליראיו has come to???
This monumental חילול ה' could easily have been avoided, had we only had people with both יראת שמים and working KNOWLEDGE OF SECULAR LAW pertaining to mental health diagnosis and treatment.
This knowledge gap needs to be fixed quickly.
The issues at stake are not just relevant to this particular fiasco with Tamar. They are much, much more wide-ranging. Outdated secular theories of mental health at loggerheads with Torah values have made serious inroads into our communities in areas like Marriage counseling/שלו' בית, parenting/education/חינוך … The list is long. Ironically, more recent theories with strong backing from those at very pinnacle of their respective scientific fields are MORE CONGRUENT with Torah thinking - yet they are all but ignored.
Let us band together to turn this terrible חילול ה' into a tremendous קידוש ה', by dedicating the time and resources necessary to really get a “handle” on these complex issues.
Rav Moshe Sternbuch: It is required that we protest the "heter" to remarry without a Get
This is a selection from Rav Sternbuch's weekly parasha sheet. He denounces the "heter" to remarry without a Get and says that there is not sufficient public protest against it. Furthermore the "heter" needs to be protested even if the protest doesn't seem to be effective.
מאמר שבועי בדרכי עבודת ה' וענייני הזמן
מפי מרן רבינו
הגאון רבי משה שטרנבוך שליט"א
פרשת וישלח תשע''ז
אין לי מנוחה כשעה כזאת שהפרצות כעיקרי הדת מתגברות והולכות בארץ ובחו"ל, ואין שומעים מספיק קול מחאה על חילול ה' ותורתו, ובאמריקה נתנו 'היתר' :'בטל קידושין בלא גט בטענת מקח טעות, ואף שנבלה נעשתה בישראל כמו פילגש בגבעה מ"מ לא פורסם מספיק קול מחאה.
הדבר פשוט שאין כאן הוראה אלא טעות מעיקרא, שכל בחור ישיבה יודע שאם לאחר שידע מהמום המשיך להשתמש בו אח"כ, אין דין מקח טעות, ולכו"ע תצא :מזה ומזה והוולד ממזר .
וחובה להצטער ולהוקיע מה שנעשה בעו"ה, והחילול ה' הוא נורא מאוד כשרבנים עוקרים בשם התורה יסוד דיני אישות, וכבר כתב מהרש"ל בפ"ק דב"ק שהוא ביהרג ובל יעבור שלא יעקרו דין תורה. ובארץ ישראל בשעה שהתיר הרב ראשי ממזר, ולדבריו חתמו עמו עשרה רבנים, צירה הגאב"ד בעל מנחת יצחק וגדולי ישראל זצ"ל לכנוס את כולם וישבו בארץ ואמרו קינות, ורבים קרעו עמו בגדיהם על חילול כבוד ה' ותורתו, ואף שהוא התיר ממזר שהוא באיסור לאו, וכאן הפרצה היא על איסור אשת איש שחמור יותר, מ"מ לא שמעו עדיין קול מחאה מספיק. ומצווה למחות אף אם לא יוכלו לפעול, שעצם הדבר שמוחים הוא זכות רבה מאוד, וישוב חרון אף ה' על עמו שפוגעים בתורתו, שהרי קיבלנו ערבות לשמור התורה לנצח לעולם וועד.
ומפי מו"ר הגה"צ רבי משה שניידער זצ"ל שמעתי כמה פעמים שבשמים מצפים ושואלים האם נשמע קול מחאה, ואם נשמע קול מחאה, אז מתקיים מאמר הכתוב (מלאב' ג' ט"ז) "ויקשב ה' וישמע ויכתב ספר זיכרון לפניו ליראי ה' ולחושבי שמו", ויהי רצון שיהא חלקינו עמהם".
Thursday, November 26, 2015
Rav Dovid Eidensohn Telephone Conference about Tamar Epstein's Heter Thursday at 9 p.m.
Last night the telephone conference didn't work
because they changed the numbers and I didn't know about it. So I am
making the conference tonight Thursday at nine oclock PM. The old
numbers are no longer valid.
The new numbers are
call in 641-715-3580
access code 884800#
Vayishlach; What We Need To Know About Camel Milk
Yaakov Aveinu sent to Eisav a large gift. Five different types of animals were included; sheep, goats, camels, cows, and donkeys....
However, there is an interesting difference between them. With four out of five of the species, Yaakov Aveinu included both male and female, but he did not include a male camel. Additionally, the child of the camels were included, but no other calf's were sent...
Rashi quotes a Medrash as a SECOND pshat/explanation, but in the simple meaning, these discrepancies don't seem to be addressed...
For questions or comments please email salmahshleima@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)