Friday, July 18, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump.

 https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796?mod=hp_lead_pos7

The leather-bound book was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. The president says the letter ‘is a fake thing.’

It was Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday, and Ghislaine Maxwell was preparing a special gift to mark the occasion. She turned to Epstein’s family and friends. One of them was Donald Trump.

Maxwell collected letters from Trump and dozens of Epstein’s other associates for a 2003 birthday album, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. 

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Crockett torches Trump over Epstein: 'He's got something to hide'

Nothing to See here

Trump Calls Epstein Case a "Hoax" & Turns on His "Stupid" Supporters Amid MAGA Mutiny

Coca-Cola dodges after Trump says soda will switch back to cane sugar

 https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/coca-cola-dodges-trump-says-soda-will-switch-back-cane-sugar-rcna219225

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Coca-Cola in the United States will begin to be made with cane sugar, but the company did not explicitly say that was the case when it was asked later about Trump’s claim.

'Not going away': Ex-GOP rep hurls Trump Jr.'s old tweets back at president

 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/not-going-away-ex-gop-rep-hurls-trump-jr-s-old-tweets-back-at-president/ar-AA1IJG4z?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=NMTS&cvid=68780b48203a46e3aaf14a1065b248c7&ei=28

Kinzinger said there are two things that Americans should keep in mind regarding the Epstein files story. First, Epstein was arrested in 2019 under the first Trump administration. Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, is also in jail. The combination of these two points suggests that there is a client list despite Trump's repeated assertions that it is a hoax.

Second, Trump "built a political movement" on the back of the Epstein case, Kinzinger said. He used the case to create a story about Democratic elites operating a child sex trafficking ring, and then positioned himself as someone fighting back against that cabal.

"Either they lied about this conspiracy over and over to win an election, or they're covering something up," Kinzinger said on CNN's "The Arena with Kasie Hunt."

Danon blasts Guterres: UN silent on Syria massacre, targets Israel

 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/411791

In response, Danon said, “UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres continues to expose his moral bankruptcy. While members of the Druze community are being brutally slaughtered in Syria, he once again chooses silence.”

“Instead of calling for swift action in Syria, he chooses to vilify Israel—the only country actively fighting the forces of evil in the region,” added the Israeli envoy.

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Branding Matters: What's In a Name?

 20 Tammuz, 5785/ Parshas Pinchos


Q: How do the following coalesce: (1) the recent Parshiyos HaShavuah - Bolok and Pinchos; (2) the fast of the 17th of Tammuz; and (3) this week's Daf Yomi - meseches Avoda Zorah, daf 26, 27 and 28? 

A: They all relate, in some manner, to incitement to - or devotees of incitement to - Avoda Zorah. It's noteworthy that Shiva Assar BeTammuz - when many Jews fell into the terrible sin of the Chait Ha'Aigel - ultimately leading to public defection to Avoda Zorah (idolatry) - is immediately followed - this year - by the Daf haYomi learning of three separate Gemaras on three consecutive blatt - all involving Minnim. [Minnim are devotees of Avoda Zorah, suspect of promoting their Avoda Zorah agenda, even where the average idolatrous gentile is not suspected of doing so.]

Furthermore, these all fall out on the week between Parshas Bolok and Pinchusparshiyos which end and begin, respectively, with the idolatrous abomination of Ba'al Pe'or, and the timeless leadership exhibited by Pinchus - rescuing the Nation from epic Divine Retribution (Bam. 25:1-18).

We beg indulgence of the esteemed tzibbur to encapsulate a clarification BE"H of a very relevant but poorly grasped sugya - pertaining to Minnim and Minnus - found in two of those very selections of Daf Yomi of this week - Avoda Zorah 27b and 28a. (See our kuntrus Mishmeres HaKodesh and/or our online posts on Da'at Torah blogspot for more details.)

The Gemara on 27b addresses the very commonly applicable prohibition of Avoda-Zorah-by-Attribution, "Ain Misrapin min HaMinnim."  That is a Rabbinic edict prohibiting merely benefiting (even in absence of any worship) from mystical therapies/ techniques whose effectiveness (real or imagined) is attributed to idolatrous or heretical notions. [Numerous additional prohibitions may apply to such mystical therapies when performed isolated from any idolatrous or heretical attributions. However, that's beyond our scope here, and is addressed extensively elsewhere, including online (e.g. Da'at Torah blogspot. Furthermore, there are those Rishonim who extend this prohibition to non-mystical therapies. However that more stringent view is not quoted in Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Daiyah 155:1; therefore we won't address it here.]

The rationale behind this prohibition is as follows: In case the mystical techniques would work, then the absence of an evident natural mechanism - combined with the fact that the practitioner attributed it to Avoda Zorah - may lead someone to succumb to the heretical myth that Avoda Zorah has some inherent power. That error would constitute high heresy, inasmuch as it is a foundational Jewish conviction (often translated as "belief") that no entity other than G-d has the ability to harm or help us based on its own independent "will" (see Chazon Ish, Yoreh Daiyoh 62:19, for example).

Therefore, to safeguard Jews against the hazard of succumbing to such a heretical misconception, Our Sages require us to sacrifice our lives rather than benefit from such "healing" - precisely because of how it's identified/ labelled, or "branded."  They required one to sacrifice his or her life out of a concern for a possible (spiritual) threat to Emunah - in the face of a certain danger to their physical life (see Teshuvas Maharam Shik, O.C. 304). Thus, the "mere" idolatrous "branding" of a mystical therapy, such as a lachash, an incantation,  transforms that lachash to be prohibited to the extent of sacrificing one's life to avoid it, a status termed "Yaihoraig ve'al Ya'avor."

Unfortunately, that sugya in A.Z. 27b (continued on 28a) is widely misunderstood.  Additionally, one popular English language aide does not at all well serve the public in that regard. The unaware or misinformed reader could easily come away with the misimpression that the prohibition is applicable only in cases when the therapy is performed by an overt pagan missionary, a Min (in other words, that it's only an "issur gavrah"). However, if the practitioner doesn't fall under that Min/ devotee profile, this prohibition, they imagine, doesn't apply.

This misunderstanding is perhaps even more dangerous than it is wrong.

In fact, that issur (prohibition) is more fundamentally an issur "cheftzah" - prohibited by virtue of the actual attribution to idolatrous/ heretical notions - regardless of who attributes it to Avoda Zorah. That means that the issur would similarly apply to a frum Yid unaware of the nature of the terms he's using (e.g. Qi, Ch-i, K-i, Vital-Force, Y-in/ Y-ang, universal-energy, subtle-energy, etc.*) to describe the mechanism or nature of the technique.

[* See the end of the Psak published in the Sefer Rav Belsky on Alternative Medicine et.al., Judaica Press, page 130.  The concept of "universal energy"/ Ki, Q-i/Ch-i, et.al. is a heretical concept; its' worldview is a heretical worldview; and all associated notions must be totally avoided.]

Now, on top of that basic prohibitionthere is an additional stringency introduced by the gavrah - in the case of a Minn practitioner - a devotee of A.Z./ heresy.

This Halachic nuance is clarified by the Ran on Avoda Zorah (s.v. "Ve'ikka," quoted by the Maharsha), and the Rosh (2:9), and cited leHalacha in Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Daiyoh 155:1, end.  Any attribution to idolatry/ heresy prohibits a mystical therapy/ practice/ technique -- even if the attributor is not a devotee, a Min. A devotee, however, does introduce an additional stringency - inasmuch as his involvement in performing such therapies prohibits them even in the absence of any overt attribution to idolatry/ heresy - because we assume that he is indeed attributing his mystical therapy to idolatrous/ heretical notions.

••• More information on a range of related concerns is found in the Sefer Rav Belsky on Alternative Medicine et.al., Judaica Press; in particular see the Psak on page 128-130. 

••• For shailos and questions, please email Tomim1679@gmail.com, or text/call 845-642-1679, or, from Eretz Yisroel, call 03-721-3337.

May we start off these Three Weeks by expediting the Final Redemption in the merit of helping save all who wish to be saved from falling into the types of iniquities that perpetuate this bitter Galus. Furthermore, may the efforts to blunt the influence of Minnim and eliminate brazen detractors of authentic Emunah provide much needed merits in reducing our communal susceptibility to Middas HaDin, as Chazal exhort us:

כשיש עבודה זרה בעולם - יש חרון אף בעולם...

Good Shabbos,

נתן שמואל לייטער

Rabbi Noson Shmuel Leiter,

Executive Director,

Tomim Tih'yeh 

Monsey, NY

845.642.1679

Direct: 771.215.8892

Israeli Helpline: 03.721.3337 עזרה בארץ ישראל

Presentations on New-Age dangers: 605-313-6831 ext. 2  לשיעורים 

Tomim Tih'yeh: tomim1679@gmail.com

Heard weekly on New Jersey's WSNR Radio 620AM, on the renowned LevinAt11 program, every Thursday evening, 11pm to midnight (Eastern Time).

Alan Dershowitz confirms ‘for a fact’ Epstein list exists after Pami Bondi blasted for humiliating cover-up

Trump Turns on MAGA: Only ‘Bad People’ Buy ‘Epstein Hoax’

 https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-maga-only-bad-people-buy-epstein-files-hoax.html

Donald Trump is in quite the predicament. Whenever there’s a story he doesn’t like, he just dismisses it as a “hoax” and attacks anyone who keeps talking about it as “bad people,” “scum,” “the enemy of the people,” or perhaps some combination of these insults.

But right now, the story the president would like to go away is his administration’s failure to release the Jeffrey Epstein “client list” or any truly revelatory information about the late sex offender. And the people most incensed about this story aren’t Democrats or the mainstream media but MAGA influencers and other elements of the GOP base, who believed Team Trump when they promoted the Epstein story as a “deep state” conspiracy that would be exposed as soon as he returned to the White House.

Later on Wednesday morning, Trump chided “stupid” Republicans for playing into Democrats’ hands by demanding the answers they were promised on Epstein.

“It’s all been a big hoax; it’s perpetrated by the Democrats,” he said. “And some stupid Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into the net and so they do the Democrats’ work.”

So from one perspective, Trump is escalating the conflict with his own supporters like never before. But from another perspective, you’re not truly MAGA if you believe what Trump told you to think a few months ago, rather than what he’s telling you to believe today. So he’s actually only lashing out at Democrats and their “stupid” ex-MAGA allies. Problem solved!


Havdala - Standing or Sitting

Igros Moshe (OC V #20.17) Question Should Havdala be said standing or sitting?Answer The most widespread custom is to say havdala standing. Because this is not viewed as merely a beracha on eating or drinking. This seems reasonable because in fact it is prohibited to eat and drink before saying Havdalah and itself it is not a type of eating. In fact even if you don’t eat at all you still need to say havdala and according to Rashi you don’t even need to drink the wine of havdala and it is not considered a vain beracha. So the beracha said on the wine is clearly not viewed as a beracha on pleasure and therefore there is no requirement to sit. It would follow from this that havdala should only be said standing. However many sit for havdala since one person says for others and that requires sitting. Thus it is a dispute among the poskim whether sitting or standing is better. Therefore it is best to follow the custom of one’s father. I personally say havdala sitting as this was my father’s custom.

Igros Moshe (OC V #16.5) Question: Regardings those who say Kiddush standing what do they do for Pesach? Answer  The custom to stand even in the home is not based on halacha.  The Rema indicates (271:10) that it is best not to stand for kiddush because it is not so much the place of the meal however if a person really wants he can stand. Thus he clearly gives preference to sitting. Thus those who insist on standing for kiddush are going against the Remah and thus the custom. Even for Havdalah where the common practice is to stand, the Remah says there are those who stand for havdala and this is the prevailing custom. Tosfos also notes that the prevailing custom is to stand and notes that there is a problem when it is said for others since kevius is required which requires sitting. Tosfos also doesn’t say that one must stand because of custom and indicates it is best to sit for Havdalah.  . Consequently  everyone agrees that for kiddush it is best to sit even if it means that for saying vayechulu it is necessary to stand and the Remah adds that one can remain standing for the rest of kiddush. Nevertheless he concludes it is best to sit. Thus vayechulu is said standing  and then one should sit for the rest of kiddush . He even says there are those who sit also for vayechulu since vayechulu was already said standing in ynagogue. . 

Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro Debate Whether Epstein Was an Intelligence Asset for America or Israel

Evidence of Epstein's Ties to Israeli Intelligence EXPLAINED

Tucker Carlson suggests Jeffrey Epstein was working for Mossad

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/tucker-carlson-suggests-jeffrey-epstein-was-working-for-israels-mossad-spy-agency/

Addressing the conservative conference, Carlson said that the real question that needed to be asked about Epstein was not “was Jeffrey Epstein a weirdo who was abusing girls?” but rather, “why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where was the money coming from?”

“And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American,” he said. “And we have every right to ask, ‘On whose behalf was he working?'”

He answered his own question a moment later, declaring it “extremely obvious to anyone who watches” that Epstein “had direct connections to a foreign government.”

“Now, no one’s allowed to say that foreign government is Israel, because we’ve been somehow cowed into thinking that that’s naughty,” he said, raising his voice as the crowd erupted into applause and cheers of support.

“There is nothing wrong with saying that, there’s nothing hateful about saying that, there’s nothing antisemitic about saying that — there’s nothing even anti-Israel about saying that!”